Would You Consider 69?

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Social Security

Raising the retirement age to 69. That’s what they’re talking about right now in certain committees. Personally, my opinion is that Social Security needs a fix, but I don’t think you need to penalize everybody. The numbers show that if you lift the cap on those people who earn more than 90K, the program would instantly become solvent.

However, now we’re faced with other issues and one of them is boosting the retirement age. Anybody think this is a good idea?

From the Washington Post:

…an increase in the retirement age is one of the suggestions that Sen. Charles Grassley, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, outlined last week for fellow Republicans on the panel, according to several officials. Officials said Grassley’s suggestion for raising the retirement age would be phased in, possibly over two decades or more, depending on future demographic trends.

At least Grassley is considering some compromises too.

The Iowa Republican has also suggested steps to hold down benefits for future upper-income retirees. The officials who described his presentation did so on condition of anonymity, saying the discussions were confidential.

And lastly I’d just like to point out a little common sense. Somebody who has probably worked for nearly 40+ years deserves to retire at 65. Heck, they deserve to retire earlier than that. Hiking the age isn’t right. And not to put too fine a point on it, but for the government to make that decision is suspect at best. I’m sure you’ll find that the majority of people in Washington politics have the ability to retire far earlier than 65 if they want to. They should instead give that decision to the people to settle. I know that won’t happen, but it should.


This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 15th, 2005 and is filed under Social Security. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “Would You Consider 69?”

  1. Joshua Says:

    Would You Consider 69?

    Is it just me and my dirty mind, or does that headline sound like a shameless come-on? :)

  2. Cameron Says:

    There is no chance of 69 whether Washington wants it or not. There was a time when I earned above the cap and that never made any sense to me. It was a nice raise later in the year but totally unnecesary.

Leave a Reply


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.

Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.

One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.

Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.

Related Posts: