Predicting The SCOTUS Rhetoric: Democrats
By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Comedy, General Politics, Supreme CourtPennywit from Wizbang has this hilarious look at the upcoming Supreme Court fight.
The question remains, how far off will the Dems statements be from this?
When Sandra Day O’Connor stepped down from the Supreme Court, President Bush had an opportunity to prove that he really is a uniter, rather than a divider. He could have consulted with senators from both parties and nominated a judge who values those freedoms that Americans hold dear.But President Bush failed to do so. Instead, he has chosen one of the most divisive nominees available, one who has received the lowest ranking ever from [Group to be determined later]. President Bush’s nominee favors Republican special interests, rather than individual freedom. The nominee is also an incredibly divisive figure, as can be seen in any number of the opinions he has written over his checkered judicial history.
Democratic senators are incredibly disappointed that President Bush has politicized the judicial process and chosen such a divisive nominee to replace Sandra Day O’Connor. These sorts of extremist judges should not be allowed in the judiciary at all … and certainly not on the highest court in the land.
Found via Dean’s World.
This entry was posted on Sunday, July 3rd, 2005 and is filed under Comedy, General Politics, Supreme Court. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.











August 7th, 2006 at 10:23 pm
Good job.