<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intelligent Design Back In The News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/08/02/intelligent-design-back-in-the-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/02/intelligent-design-back-in-the-news/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:24:43 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike H.</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/02/intelligent-design-back-in-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-68612</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 03:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/08/02/intelligent-design-back-in-the-news/#comment-68612</guid>
		<description>This Irrational  fear and rejection the USA has of Science will be our down fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Irrational  fear and rejection the USA has of Science will be our down fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/02/intelligent-design-back-in-the-news/comment-page-1/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/08/02/intelligent-design-back-in-the-news/#comment-864</guid>
		<description>It has been unconstitutional to teach creationism in public schools since 1987 (Edwards v. Aguillard) since it promotes a particular religion&#039;s beliefs.  

There is a good article in The Economist this week about the &quot;intelligent design&quot; push as well: http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=4232431

I agree that it is a bunch of nonsense.  Though according to the article, a large portion of Americans still don&#039;t want to face the science.

&quot;Two-thirds of Americans think humans were directly created by God (as opposed to 22% who think people &quot;evolved from an earlier species&quot;). Half do not think apes and men had a common ancestor.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been unconstitutional to teach creationism in public schools since 1987 (Edwards v. Aguillard) since it promotes a particular religion&#8217;s beliefs.  </p>
<p>There is a good article in The Economist this week about the &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; push as well: <a href="http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=4232431" rel="nofollow">http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=4232431</a></p>
<p>I agree that it is a bunch of nonsense.  Though according to the article, a large portion of Americans still don&#8217;t want to face the science.</p>
<p>&#8220;Two-thirds of Americans think humans were directly created by God (as opposed to 22% who think people &#8220;evolved from an earlier species&#8221;). Half do not think apes and men had a common ancestor.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
