<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Frist vs. Drug Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/08/04/frist-vs-drug-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/04/frist-vs-drug-ads/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:33:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jaed</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/04/frist-vs-drug-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>jaed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 00:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/08/04/frist-vs-drug-ads/#comment-959</guid>
		<description>&quot;drives a wedge between doctors and patients&quot;

I think you misspelled &quot;threatens to give patients enough information to behave like clients hiring an expert for his services&quot;.

Advertising for prescription drugs is only one vehicle of such information, of course, and a very limited one. But this &quot;driving a wedge&quot; phrasing seems to me to imply that the relationship of patient to doctor &lt;b&gt;should&lt;/b&gt; be a helpless and uninformed one. Otherwise, why would providing information to the patient damage the relationship? (What next - moves to outlaw websites with unapproved levels of medical information?) Bah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;drives a wedge between doctors and patients&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you misspelled &#8220;threatens to give patients enough information to behave like clients hiring an expert for his services&#8221;.</p>
<p>Advertising for prescription drugs is only one vehicle of such information, of course, and a very limited one. But this &#8220;driving a wedge&#8221; phrasing seems to me to imply that the relationship of patient to doctor <b>should</b> be a helpless and uninformed one. Otherwise, why would providing information to the patient damage the relationship? (What next &#8211; moves to outlaw websites with unapproved levels of medical information?) Bah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/04/frist-vs-drug-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 21:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/08/04/frist-vs-drug-ads/#comment-921</guid>
		<description>i call bulls**t. frist is only doing this to promote himself as the next president. He wasn&#039;t pro-stem cell or ant-drug advertisement before...strange he is doing it now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i call bulls**t. frist is only doing this to promote himself as the next president. He wasn&#8217;t pro-stem cell or ant-drug advertisement before&#8230;strange he is doing it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
