<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Christopher Walken IS Running For President</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 04:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chaz K</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-188661</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaz K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 04:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-188661</guid>
		<description>I believe this is just a ploy to sell T-shirts that say"Walkin for President 2008", nothing more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe this is just a ploy to sell T-shirts that say&#8221;Walkin for President 2008&#8243;, nothing more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candy Rosenbaum</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-11783</link>
		<dc:creator>Candy Rosenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 20:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-11783</guid>
		<description>I can also confirm this is a hoax. Chris wrote to his fans personally back in the fall to say that he isn't running for president. You can see his letter here
http://www.walkenfanclub.com/images/walkensept05letter.jpg
Also, his agent Toni Howard also spoke about it to the LA Times
http://www.azcentral.com/ent/pop/articles/0819walkenforprez0819.html

It would be cool if it were true, but it isn't. Sorry
Candy Rosenbaum
Walken Fan Club</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can also confirm this is a hoax. Chris wrote to his fans personally back in the fall to say that he isn&#8217;t running for president. You can see his letter here<br />
<a href="http://www.walkenfanclub.com/images/walkensept05letter.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.walkenfanclub.com/images/walkensept05letter.jpg</a><br />
Also, his agent Toni Howard also spoke about it to the LA Times<br />
<a href="http://www.azcentral.com/ent/pop/articles/0819walkenforprez0819.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.azcentral.com/ent/pop/articles/0819walkenforprez0819.html</a></p>
<p>It would be cool if it were true, but it isn&#8217;t. Sorry<br />
Candy Rosenbaum<br />
Walken Fan Club</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnacules</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-7443</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnacules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 15:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-7443</guid>
		<description>OMFG! What is it with Actors and Politics? I mean I know they are both basically the same thing but one pays a hell of a lot more then the other :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMFG! What is it with Actors and Politics? I mean I know they are both basically the same thing but one pays a hell of a lot more then the other :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Foamy</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-3812</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Foamy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 17:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-3812</guid>
		<description>Well Walken is running for president with or without his consent cause i just nominated him</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Walken is running for president with or without his consent cause i just nominated him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Walken-4-Prez Is A Hoax</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-1324</link>
		<dc:creator>Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Walken-4-Prez Is A Hoax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 03:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-1324</guid>
		<description>[...] My apologies for helping spread this rumor, but it seemed weird and cool enough that it could possibly be true. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My apologies for helping spread this rumor, but it seemed weird and cool enough that it could possibly be true. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-1297</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-1297</guid>
		<description>The site is a hoax.  I spoke to Maura Buxbaum at ID PR, Walken's publicist.  She said that Walken "has no aspirations for public office."

http://www.rizzn.com/2005/08/walken-for-president-2008-is-confirmed.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site is a hoax.  I spoke to Maura Buxbaum at ID PR, Walken&#8217;s publicist.  She said that Walken &#8220;has no aspirations for public office.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rizzn.com/2005/08/walken-for-president-2008-is-confirmed.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.rizzn.com/2005/08/walken-for-president-2008-is-confirmed.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-1292</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-1292</guid>
		<description>"Clinton was elected in 1992 because Ross Perot sucked off enough Rep-ish votes."

Actually, this is a bit of conventional wisdom that Republicans have used to convince themselves that the Bush 2000 election was no different than Clinton in 92. However, exit polls showed that Perot voters were split nearly 50-50 on which candidate they would have voted for if Perot wasn't in the race, despite Republican claims that they would have all gone for Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Clinton was elected in 1992 because Ross Perot sucked off enough Rep-ish votes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, this is a bit of conventional wisdom that Republicans have used to convince themselves that the Bush 2000 election was no different than Clinton in 92. However, exit polls showed that Perot voters were split nearly 50-50 on which candidate they would have voted for if Perot wasn&#8217;t in the race, despite Republican claims that they would have all gone for Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-1279</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 06:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-1279</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;According to the United States Secretary of StateÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s office, Christopher Walken has not yet filed any notices of eligibility or paid any fees to get his name on any ballots.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Give the guy a break. It's 2005. All that you mention can be done later if enough support  can be mustered. Right now he's looking to see if it's there. With all due respect, give it some time before you cry "sham."

And by the way, I'm more than willing to admit I'm wrong about all this, but I think it's too early to tell if the guy is lying or not. The website (if you read it) seems very serious and very consistent. Let's wait and see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>According to the United States Secretary of StateÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s office, Christopher Walken has not yet filed any notices of eligibility or paid any fees to get his name on any ballots.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Give the guy a break. It&#8217;s 2005. All that you mention can be done later if enough support  can be mustered. Right now he&#8217;s looking to see if it&#8217;s there. With all due respect, give it some time before you cry &#8220;sham.&#8221;</p>
<p>And by the way, I&#8217;m more than willing to admit I&#8217;m wrong about all this, but I think it&#8217;s too early to tell if the guy is lying or not. The website (if you read it) seems very serious and very consistent. Let&#8217;s wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Back &#187; Chris Walken 2008: We need this man for president</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back &#187; Chris Walken 2008: We need this man for president</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 04:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-1276</guid>
		<description>[...] Big news, guys. Apparently the story is true, and we should all vote for Walkin in the next election!!! donklephant.com/2005/08/14/chr&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Big news, guys. Apparently the story is true, and we should all vote for Walkin in the next election!!! donklephant.com/2005/08/14/chr&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev. Dubya</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-1273</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev. Dubya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 03:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-1273</guid>
		<description>According to the United States Secretary of State's office, Christopher Walken has not yet filed any notices of eligibility or paid any fees to get his name on any ballots.

I really think this whole thing is a sham.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the United States Secretary of State&#8217;s office, Christopher Walken has not yet filed any notices of eligibility or paid any fees to get his name on any ballots.</p>
<p>I really think this whole thing is a sham.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Grey - Liberty Dad</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-1272</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Grey - Liberty Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 03:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/08/14/christopher-walken-is-running-for-president/#comment-1272</guid>
		<description>If he's unwilling to reform the Dems, he's most likely to split them even worse than Nader.

"losing lives at war" implies he'd rather lose lives, like 9/11, while NOT at war?  Sounds like an anti-war, non Christian, therefore Dem variant.

Nixon was elected in 1968 because of Wallace.
Jon Anderson did NOT stop Reagan from being elected in 1980 (but did stop Ed Clark, Libertarian, from establishing a real party)
Clinton was elected in 1992 because Ross Perot sucked off enough Rep-ish votes.
Bush was elected in 2000 because Nader sucked off enough Dem-ish votes.

Smart strategy though, if he wants to be independent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he&#8217;s unwilling to reform the Dems, he&#8217;s most likely to split them even worse than Nader.</p>
<p>&#8220;losing lives at war&#8221; implies he&#8217;d rather lose lives, like 9/11, while NOT at war?  Sounds like an anti-war, non Christian, therefore Dem variant.</p>
<p>Nixon was elected in 1968 because of Wallace.<br />
Jon Anderson did NOT stop Reagan from being elected in 1980 (but did stop Ed Clark, Libertarian, from establishing a real party)<br />
Clinton was elected in 1992 because Ross Perot sucked off enough Rep-ish votes.<br />
Bush was elected in 2000 because Nader sucked off enough Dem-ish votes.</p>
<p>Smart strategy though, if he wants to be independent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.200 seconds -->
