<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Iraq Constitution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/08/23/the-iraq-constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/23/the-iraq-constitution/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/23/the-iraq-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-1588</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/08/23/the-iraq-constitution/#comment-1588</guid>
		<description>A perfect constitiution does not a perfect democracy make. They can demand a separation of church and state AND equal powers of women on the spot (they had it under Husseitn) one day and destroy it culturally the next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A perfect constitiution does not a perfect democracy make. They can demand a separation of church and state AND equal powers of women on the spot (they had it under Husseitn) one day and destroy it culturally the next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/23/the-iraq-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-1566</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/08/23/the-iraq-constitution/#comment-1566</guid>
		<description>Fascinating.

I particularly find 1.a and 1.b interesting: the only way I could square those would be to assume that the actual lawmaking powers shall be pretty limited.  Not a bad thing :)

Also, article 36 and 39 are excellent - freedom of expression, press, and religion?!  yay!  They one-upped us: we had to amend to get those...

interestingly, article 7 prohibits a specific party...  hm.  I guess it&#039;s necessary, but unfortunate that it has to be consitiutional...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating.</p>
<p>I particularly find 1.a and 1.b interesting: the only way I could square those would be to assume that the actual lawmaking powers shall be pretty limited.  Not a bad thing :)</p>
<p>Also, article 36 and 39 are excellent &#8211; freedom of expression, press, and religion?!  yay!  They one-upped us: we had to amend to get those&#8230;</p>
<p>interestingly, article 7 prohibits a specific party&#8230;  hm.  I guess it&#8217;s necessary, but unfortunate that it has to be consitiutional&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

