<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not Terrorists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/08/26/not-terrorists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/26/not-terrorists/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOHN P BOYCE</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/26/not-terrorists/comment-page-1/#comment-1654</link>
		<dc:creator>JOHN P BOYCE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 04:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/08/26/not-terrorists/#comment-1654</guid>
		<description>I think &quot;curve ball&quot; is one of the contributors Hanity relies on and I think Ann Coulter may be &quot;curve ball&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8220;curve ball&#8221; is one of the contributors Hanity relies on and I think Ann Coulter may be &#8220;curve ball&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/26/not-terrorists/comment-page-1/#comment-1645</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/08/26/not-terrorists/#comment-1645</guid>
		<description>After watching them for a few years, I&#039;ve come to realize that FoxNews has the most intellectually suspect &quot;contributors&quot; on their programs. I realize they&#039;ve capture quite a bit of market share with the &quot;Fair and Balanced&quot; marketing campaign. And you know what? Good for them. They were able to see a trend and capitalize on it. 

But situations like this just illustrate the caliber of people they put their faith in to deliver us news and information that&#039;s fair and balanced. Sometimes it seems to be anything but.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After watching them for a few years, I&#8217;ve come to realize that FoxNews has the most intellectually suspect &#8220;contributors&#8221; on their programs. I realize they&#8217;ve capture quite a bit of market share with the &#8220;Fair and Balanced&#8221; marketing campaign. And you know what? Good for them. They were able to see a trend and capitalize on it. </p>
<p>But situations like this just illustrate the caliber of people they put their faith in to deliver us news and information that&#8217;s fair and balanced. Sometimes it seems to be anything but.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

