<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Want My MTV, Indecency and All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/08/30/i-want-my-mtv-indecency-and-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/30/i-want-my-mtv-indecency-and-all/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: StatVoid</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/30/i-want-my-mtv-indecency-and-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1709</link>
		<dc:creator>StatVoid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=725#comment-1709</guid>
		<description>Cable &amp; satellite operators &lt;i&gt;should&lt;/i&gt; offer &quot;family friendly&quot; packages...at least something so that irresponsible parents can pipe down. Those who actually care and monitor what their kids are watching are people I applaud. I&#039;m not saying I agree with all their decisions, but if they can do their parenting without infringing on other people, then for that I give them tons of credit.

The PTC is rediculous, they are a strong-arm group of censorship extremists who are so unable to control themselves or their children that they need the government to do it for them. I&#039;m sure many of them were the product of strict parents who actually tried to discipline them and when they got older they told themselves, &quot;my child won&#039;t have the &#039;awful&#039; childhood that I did.&quot; Because of this, they have decided that in order to do that they can&#039;t discipline their children what-so-ever (i.e., spanking, raising their voice, &lt;i&gt;etc&lt;/i&gt;), so instead they have decided to find ways to get the government to tell &lt;i&gt;everybody&lt;/i&gt; that this or that is so bad. That is why many of these parents have children who grow up resenting them and being bigger problems than they would&#039;ve been if the parents had just done some real, old-school parenting.

The problem with the people on the far-right and far-left sides of the political (or any other subject) spectrum is that they are stubborn and see things with an idealist point of view. The problem with the middle--which there are &lt;b&gt;far more of&lt;/b&gt; in this country--is that they don&#039;t care enough about anything to organize and tell these people to back off. That is the one major fault about this country and because of that our so-called freedoms are deteriorating (quite) slowly but surely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cable &amp; satellite operators <i>should</i> offer &#8220;family friendly&#8221; packages&#8230;at least something so that irresponsible parents can pipe down. Those who actually care and monitor what their kids are watching are people I applaud. I&#8217;m not saying I agree with all their decisions, but if they can do their parenting without infringing on other people, then for that I give them tons of credit.</p>
<p>The PTC is rediculous, they are a strong-arm group of censorship extremists who are so unable to control themselves or their children that they need the government to do it for them. I&#8217;m sure many of them were the product of strict parents who actually tried to discipline them and when they got older they told themselves, &#8220;my child won&#8217;t have the &#8216;awful&#8217; childhood that I did.&#8221; Because of this, they have decided that in order to do that they can&#8217;t discipline their children what-so-ever (i.e., spanking, raising their voice, <i>etc</i>), so instead they have decided to find ways to get the government to tell <i>everybody</i> that this or that is so bad. That is why many of these parents have children who grow up resenting them and being bigger problems than they would&#8217;ve been if the parents had just done some real, old-school parenting.</p>
<p>The problem with the people on the far-right and far-left sides of the political (or any other subject) spectrum is that they are stubborn and see things with an idealist point of view. The problem with the middle&#8211;which there are <b>far more of</b> in this country&#8211;is that they don&#8217;t care enough about anything to organize and tell these people to back off. That is the one major fault about this country and because of that our so-called freedoms are deteriorating (quite) slowly but surely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/30/i-want-my-mtv-indecency-and-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=725#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that people like Pat Trueman aren&#039;t really pushing for cable indecency regulation to protect kids, but rather to prevent indecent programming from going mainstream (as shows like &lt;i&gt;South Park&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;The Sopranos&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Sex and the City&lt;/i&gt; already have done). People like this are called &quot;cultural conservatives&quot; for a reason - as they see it, they&#039;re fighting to prevent sex, violence and vulgarity from creeping any further into the mainstream than it already has.

In any event, based on what I&#039;ve read on other blogs (such as Volokh.com), the general consensus is that any attempt to regulate subscription-based TV or radio content has just about zero chance of surviving a court challenge. In that case, the FCC may ultimately find itself forced to choose between doing away with indecency restrictions on the &lt;b&gt;broadcast&lt;/b&gt; side as well, or letting broadcast TV and radio slowly die, unable to compete with their subscription-based counterparts on a level playing field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that people like Pat Trueman aren&#8217;t really pushing for cable indecency regulation to protect kids, but rather to prevent indecent programming from going mainstream (as shows like <i>South Park</i>, <i>The Sopranos</i> and <i>Sex and the City</i> already have done). People like this are called &#8220;cultural conservatives&#8221; for a reason &#8211; as they see it, they&#8217;re fighting to prevent sex, violence and vulgarity from creeping any further into the mainstream than it already has.</p>
<p>In any event, based on what I&#8217;ve read on other blogs (such as Volokh.com), the general consensus is that any attempt to regulate subscription-based TV or radio content has just about zero chance of surviving a court challenge. In that case, the FCC may ultimately find itself forced to choose between doing away with indecency restrictions on the <b>broadcast</b> side as well, or letting broadcast TV and radio slowly die, unable to compete with their subscription-based counterparts on a level playing field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

