<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Want My MTV, Indecency and All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/08/30/i-want-my-mtv-indecency-and-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/30/i-want-my-mtv-indecency-and-all/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 06:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: StatVoid</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/30/i-want-my-mtv-indecency-and-all/#comment-1709</link>
		<dc:creator>StatVoid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=725#comment-1709</guid>
		<description>Cable &#38; satellite operators &lt;i&gt;should&lt;/i&gt; offer "family friendly" packages...at least something so that irresponsible parents can pipe down. Those who actually care and monitor what their kids are watching are people I applaud. I'm not saying I agree with all their decisions, but if they can do their parenting without infringing on other people, then for that I give them tons of credit.

The PTC is rediculous, they are a strong-arm group of censorship extremists who are so unable to control themselves or their children that they need the government to do it for them. I'm sure many of them were the product of strict parents who actually tried to discipline them and when they got older they told themselves, "my child won't have the 'awful' childhood that I did." Because of this, they have decided that in order to do that they can't discipline their children what-so-ever (i.e., spanking, raising their voice, &lt;i&gt;etc&lt;/i&gt;), so instead they have decided to find ways to get the government to tell &lt;i&gt;everybody&lt;/i&gt; that this or that is so bad. That is why many of these parents have children who grow up resenting them and being bigger problems than they would've been if the parents had just done some real, old-school parenting.

The problem with the people on the far-right and far-left sides of the political (or any other subject) spectrum is that they are stubborn and see things with an idealist point of view. The problem with the middle--which there are &lt;b&gt;far more of&lt;/b&gt; in this country--is that they don't care enough about anything to organize and tell these people to back off. That is the one major fault about this country and because of that our so-called freedoms are deteriorating (quite) slowly but surely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cable &amp; satellite operators <i>should</i> offer &#8220;family friendly&#8221; packages&#8230;at least something so that irresponsible parents can pipe down. Those who actually care and monitor what their kids are watching are people I applaud. I&#8217;m not saying I agree with all their decisions, but if they can do their parenting without infringing on other people, then for that I give them tons of credit.</p>
<p>The PTC is rediculous, they are a strong-arm group of censorship extremists who are so unable to control themselves or their children that they need the government to do it for them. I&#8217;m sure many of them were the product of strict parents who actually tried to discipline them and when they got older they told themselves, &#8220;my child won&#8217;t have the &#8216;awful&#8217; childhood that I did.&#8221; Because of this, they have decided that in order to do that they can&#8217;t discipline their children what-so-ever (i.e., spanking, raising their voice, <i>etc</i>), so instead they have decided to find ways to get the government to tell <i>everybody</i> that this or that is so bad. That is why many of these parents have children who grow up resenting them and being bigger problems than they would&#8217;ve been if the parents had just done some real, old-school parenting.</p>
<p>The problem with the people on the far-right and far-left sides of the political (or any other subject) spectrum is that they are stubborn and see things with an idealist point of view. The problem with the middle&#8211;which there are <b>far more of</b> in this country&#8211;is that they don&#8217;t care enough about anything to organize and tell these people to back off. That is the one major fault about this country and because of that our so-called freedoms are deteriorating (quite) slowly but surely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/08/30/i-want-my-mtv-indecency-and-all/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=725#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that people like Pat Trueman aren't really pushing for cable indecency regulation to protect kids, but rather to prevent indecent programming from going mainstream (as shows like &lt;i&gt;South Park&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;The Sopranos&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Sex and the City&lt;/i&gt; already have done). People like this are called "cultural conservatives" for a reason - as they see it, they're fighting to prevent sex, violence and vulgarity from creeping any further into the mainstream than it already has.

In any event, based on what I've read on other blogs (such as Volokh.com), the general consensus is that any attempt to regulate subscription-based TV or radio content has just about zero chance of surviving a court challenge. In that case, the FCC may ultimately find itself forced to choose between doing away with indecency restrictions on the &lt;b&gt;broadcast&lt;/b&gt; side as well, or letting broadcast TV and radio slowly die, unable to compete with their subscription-based counterparts on a level playing field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that people like Pat Trueman aren&#8217;t really pushing for cable indecency regulation to protect kids, but rather to prevent indecent programming from going mainstream (as shows like <i>South Park</i>, <i>The Sopranos</i> and <i>Sex and the City</i> already have done). People like this are called &#8220;cultural conservatives&#8221; for a reason - as they see it, they&#8217;re fighting to prevent sex, violence and vulgarity from creeping any further into the mainstream than it already has.</p>
<p>In any event, based on what I&#8217;ve read on other blogs (such as Volokh.com), the general consensus is that any attempt to regulate subscription-based TV or radio content has just about zero chance of surviving a court challenge. In that case, the FCC may ultimately find itself forced to choose between doing away with indecency restrictions on the <b>broadcast</b> side as well, or letting broadcast TV and radio slowly die, unable to compete with their subscription-based counterparts on a level playing field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.203 seconds -->
