<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NY Times Cuts 500 Jobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/09/20/ny-times-cut-500-jobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/09/20/ny-times-cut-500-jobs/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:59:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Callimachus</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/09/20/ny-times-cut-500-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-2362</link>
		<dc:creator>Callimachus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 19:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/09/21/ny-times-cut-500-jobs/#comment-2362</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Listen, if these dailies go under (which is unlikely), thatÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s not going to be good for anybody. But maybe they could do a much better job of catching up to todayÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s reality. Perhaps getting rid of mandatory registration will help.&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Unfortunately, &quot;today&#039;s realities&quot; are clashing with the timeless (pun intended) realities that a newspaper is a business. And with the Internet, you&#039;re giving away content. And nobody makes money to keep a staff of writers by giving it away.

Internet ads just don&#039;t do the trick the way print advertising does, for some reason (it&#039;s not my expertise). And a print newspaper makes most of its profit from ads. The money from subscription and newsstand sales is a fraction of that, but it&#039;s often the fraqction that makes a difference between red and black in the ledger books.

Subscription is a desperate attempt to channel the online readership better, the better to put ads in front of them that they&#039;ll see and use.

It&#039;s not pretty, but I can&#039;t blame them for trying. Publishing a newspaper is famously the business of buying paper at $1 a ton and selling it at $3 a ton, or some such cliche. How do you squeeze that extra $2 a ton out of the Internet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<i>Listen, if these dailies go under (which is unlikely), thatÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s not going to be good for anybody. But maybe they could do a much better job of catching up to todayÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s reality. Perhaps getting rid of mandatory registration will help.</i>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Unfortunately, &#8220;today&#8217;s realities&#8221; are clashing with the timeless (pun intended) realities that a newspaper is a business. And with the Internet, you&#8217;re giving away content. And nobody makes money to keep a staff of writers by giving it away.</p>
<p>Internet ads just don&#8217;t do the trick the way print advertising does, for some reason (it&#8217;s not my expertise). And a print newspaper makes most of its profit from ads. The money from subscription and newsstand sales is a fraction of that, but it&#8217;s often the fraqction that makes a difference between red and black in the ledger books.</p>
<p>Subscription is a desperate attempt to channel the online readership better, the better to put ads in front of them that they&#8217;ll see and use.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not pretty, but I can&#8217;t blame them for trying. Publishing a newspaper is famously the business of buying paper at $1 a ton and selling it at $3 a ton, or some such cliche. How do you squeeze that extra $2 a ton out of the Internet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Project Nothing! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The New York Times hacked 500 jobs</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/09/20/ny-times-cut-500-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-2355</link>
		<dc:creator>Project Nothing! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The New York Times hacked 500 jobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/09/21/ny-times-cut-500-jobs/#comment-2355</guid>
		<description>[...] DONKLEPHANT OBSERVES: Listen, if these dailies go under (which is unlikely), thatÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s not going to be good for anybody. But maybe they could do a much better job of catching up to todayÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s reality. Perhaps getting rid of mandatory registration will help. I know the KC newspaper does this, and itÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s annoying because I canÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t really link to them and know that my readers will get to the content. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DONKLEPHANT OBSERVES: Listen, if these dailies go under (which is unlikely), thatÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s not going to be good for anybody. But maybe they could do a much better job of catching up to todayÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s reality. Perhaps getting rid of mandatory registration will help. I know the KC newspaper does this, and itÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s annoying because I canÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t really link to them and know that my readers will get to the content. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callimachus</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/09/20/ny-times-cut-500-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-2353</link>
		<dc:creator>Callimachus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/09/21/ny-times-cut-500-jobs/#comment-2353</guid>
		<description>The &quot;Times&quot; is a very, very strange place to work. I am sure a lot of the people who are being let go have literally devoted their lives, and invested their sense of self-worth, in being &quot;Times&quot; reporters. This is more than a job loss to them; this is their worst nightmare.

There are few other institutions I can think of that so clearly represent the &quot;pinnacle&quot; of their profession. There are many great hospitals, many great sports teams. But journalism in this country is pretty much a single track, and at the top of the hill is 43rd Street. Unfortunately for all the rest of us, that means a great many of the people who arrive there do so with a great deal of strangeness and ego, which can get in the way of reporting the news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Times&#8221; is a very, very strange place to work. I am sure a lot of the people who are being let go have literally devoted their lives, and invested their sense of self-worth, in being &#8220;Times&#8221; reporters. This is more than a job loss to them; this is their worst nightmare.</p>
<p>There are few other institutions I can think of that so clearly represent the &#8220;pinnacle&#8221; of their profession. There are many great hospitals, many great sports teams. But journalism in this country is pretty much a single track, and at the top of the hill is 43rd Street. Unfortunately for all the rest of us, that means a great many of the people who arrive there do so with a great deal of strangeness and ego, which can get in the way of reporting the news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
