African Fiasco

By Callimachus | Related entries in Foreign Policy, The World

Perennial skeptic of international good intentions William Easterly romps through the quagmire of African aid.

After 43 years and $568 billion (in 2003 dollars) in foreign aid to the continent, Africa remains trapped in economic stagnation. Moreover, after $568 billion, donor officials apparently still have not gotten around to furnishing those 12-cent medicines to children to prevent half of all malaria deaths.

With all the political and popular support for such ambitious programs, why then do comprehensive packages almost always fail to accomplish much good, much less attain Utopia? They get the political and economic incentives all wrong. The biggest problem is that the rich people paying the bills do not share the same goals as the poor people they are trying to help. The wealthy have weak incentives to get the right amount of the right thing to those who need it; the poor are in no position to complain if they don’t. A more subtle problem is that if all of us are collectively responsible for a big world goal, then no single agency or politician is held accountable if the goal is not met. Collective responsibility for world goals works about as well as collective farms in agriculture, and for the same reason.

Yes, Bono makes an appearance. But Easterly is more concerned with the U.N. Millennium Project and aid packages from Blair and Bush. He compares the disjunction of governments touting their dollar-figure aid increases as a measure of success to the studio that made “Catwoman” touting it as a success because they spent $100 million on it.

The various needs of the rich are met easily enough by a system of decentralized markets and democracy, which utilize feedback from the customers and accountability of the suppliers. Rich, middle-aged men can buy Rogaine to grow hair on their heads, while women can buy Nair to get rid of hair on their legs. No Millennium Development Goal on Body Hair was necessary. The Rogaine and Nair corporations are accountable to their customers for satisfaction. If the customers don’t care for the product, the corporations go out of business; if the customers do like the product, corporations have a profit incentive to supply it. Similarly, men and women in wealthy countries can complain to democratically accountable bureaucrats and politicians if garbage collectors do not pick up their discarded Rogaine and Nair bottles. Private markets also specialize; there is no payoff for them to produce a comprehensive product that both removes hair from women’s legs and transfers it to men’s heads. The irony of the situation is tragically obvious: The cosmetic needs of the rich are met easily, while the much more desperate needs of the poor get lost in centralized, utopian, comprehensive planning.

Any hope in there? Yes, but in the long, hard slog, not the quick fix.

Fortunately, poor countries are making progress on their own, without waiting for the West to save them. The steady improvement in health and education in poor countries (except for the AIDS crisis), the market-driven growth of China and India, the movement toward democracy in Latin America and Africa (even amid continued disappointing economic growth), not to mention earlier successes such as Botswana and the East Asian Tiger economies, offer hope for homegrown and gradual development.

Hmm, there are enough “yes, buts” in that paragraph, stated and unstated, to make the prospect dim indeed. The wonderful thing about Singapores is Singapores are wonderful things. But they’re rare, rare, rare.


This entry was posted on Tuesday, September 27th, 2005 and is filed under Foreign Policy, The World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “African Fiasco”

  1. DosPeros Says:

    If anyone wants to read a great (and depressing) book about Africa, I have to suggest “Emma’s War” by Deborah Scroggins. The book takes a hard and fascinating look at the psychology and reality of western aid to Africa. The book is centered around an English relief/aid worker who falls in love with one of the Sudanese rebel chiefs.

  2. Jim Says:

    Abiola Lapite deals with this issue on a rgular basis over at his blog. You get the impression that aid from rich countries is more about feeling charitable than about improving anyone’s life. Also, as he popints out, aid actively holds these countries back, because it feeds corrupt elites and thus impedes the development of decent government in the area.

  3. DosPeros Says:

    Jim-That is basically Scroggins take on the situation. Basically: The West is incapable of looking at Africa without seeing its own historically grotesqe reflection and is thus prompted to “fix” the situation. Everytime we try to fix Africa we only perpetuate some fundamental problems — like tribalism and the use of food, water, medicine and children slaves as inter-tribal war currency.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: