<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush Chooses Miers for Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/10/03/bush-chooses-miers-for-supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/03/bush-chooses-miers-for-supreme-court/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:07:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathon York</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/03/bush-chooses-miers-for-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-2684</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 21:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/03/bush-chooses-miers-for-supreme-court-yahoo-news/#comment-2684</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a link to a post about Miers from Zathras of the Projection Blog:
http://theprojectionblog.blogspot.com/2005/10/80s-flashback-harriet-miers.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a link to a post about Miers from Zathras of the Projection Blog:<br />
<a href="http://theprojectionblog.blogspot.com/2005/10/80s-flashback-harriet-miers.html" rel="nofollow">http://theprojectionblog.blogspot.com/2005/10/80s-flashback-harriet-miers.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianOfAtlanta</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/03/bush-chooses-miers-for-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-2677</link>
		<dc:creator>BrianOfAtlanta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 19:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/03/bush-chooses-miers-for-supreme-court-yahoo-news/#comment-2677</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not much worried that she doesn&#039;t have bench experience in and of itself. After all, some very good justices have served on the court with no previous judicial experience. I&#039;m worried that she has demonstrated neither the mental capacity nor the staunch convictions which distinguished those great justices. The one word that has stuck in my brain after reading a bit about Ms. Miers, and that word is &#039;sycophant&#039;. 

In 1988, she donated $2,000 to Democratic party causes. 4 years later, she was leading a tenacious fight against supporters of Roe v. Wade. A reporter remembers her declaring that George W. Bush was the most brilliant man she had ever met. This doesn&#039;t sound to me like someone who has firm, well-established convictions. It sounds like someone who hitches her fortunes to a political star and follows it zealously wherever it leads. 

The problem is, of course, after GWB is no longer president, who does she hitch herself to? Will she become a Thomas disciple? Ginsburg? Will she remain uncommitted and flit from decision to decision, blowing with the prevailing wind? She may turn out to be a great justice, but nothing I&#039;ve seen in her background so far suggests that. I prefer not roll the dice with the Supremes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not much worried that she doesn&#8217;t have bench experience in and of itself. After all, some very good justices have served on the court with no previous judicial experience. I&#8217;m worried that she has demonstrated neither the mental capacity nor the staunch convictions which distinguished those great justices. The one word that has stuck in my brain after reading a bit about Ms. Miers, and that word is &#8217;sycophant&#8217;. </p>
<p>In 1988, she donated $2,000 to Democratic party causes. 4 years later, she was leading a tenacious fight against supporters of Roe v. Wade. A reporter remembers her declaring that George W. Bush was the most brilliant man she had ever met. This doesn&#8217;t sound to me like someone who has firm, well-established convictions. It sounds like someone who hitches her fortunes to a political star and follows it zealously wherever it leads. </p>
<p>The problem is, of course, after GWB is no longer president, who does she hitch herself to? Will she become a Thomas disciple? Ginsburg? Will she remain uncommitted and flit from decision to decision, blowing with the prevailing wind? She may turn out to be a great justice, but nothing I&#8217;ve seen in her background so far suggests that. I prefer not roll the dice with the Supremes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dryan</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/03/bush-chooses-miers-for-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-2675</link>
		<dc:creator>dryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/03/bush-chooses-miers-for-supreme-court-yahoo-news/#comment-2675</guid>
		<description>I am just not comfortable with someone who has no bench experience now being in charge of such monumental cases.  It&#039;s a totally different world from arguing before the bench.  It makes about as much sense as a Chief Justice with </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just not comfortable with someone who has no bench experience now being in charge of such monumental cases.  It&#8217;s a totally different world from arguing before the bench.  It makes about as much sense as a Chief Justice with</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathon</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/03/bush-chooses-miers-for-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-2673</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 16:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/03/bush-chooses-miers-for-supreme-court-yahoo-news/#comment-2673</guid>
		<description>So it would seem.  I have a colleague here who claims to know her.  Says that as an attorney here in Dallas she did a lot of pro bono work and encouraged fellow lawyers to do the same as chair of the Texas Bar Assn. This guy is under the impression that she&#039;s a fitting replacement for O&#039;Connor, and will likely serve in a similar capacity.  
As for judicial experience, she has never been a judge; instead she is a former member of the Dallas City Council.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it would seem.  I have a colleague here who claims to know her.  Says that as an attorney here in Dallas she did a lot of pro bono work and encouraged fellow lawyers to do the same as chair of the Texas Bar Assn. This guy is under the impression that she&#8217;s a fitting replacement for O&#8217;Connor, and will likely serve in a similar capacity.<br />
As for judicial experience, she has never been a judge; instead she is a former member of the Dallas City Council.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
