Mild About Harriet
By Callimachus | Related entries in In The News, Supreme CourtAnn Althouse notices something curious about Harriet Miers, or maybe it’s about the media that’s covering her nomination:
I have yet to see a single piece of writing by Harriet Miers dealing with an issue of constitutional law or even anything purporting to demonstrate the analytical, interpretive skills required to serve on the Supreme Court. The nomination was announced on Monday. It’s Thursday. Can we have something in writing that shows her mind in action, that inspires confidence that this is a person whose judgment we should all trust for the next two decades?
Uh-huh. But thanks to my fourth estate friends, I do know a bundle about the nuances of her church’s dogma and theology. What are we choosing here, a Pope or a judge?
This entry was posted on Friday, October 7th, 2005 and is filed under In The News, Supreme Court. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.









October 11th, 2005 at 6:13 am
The University of Michigan law library has put together a collection of her writings here: http://www.law.umich.edu/library/news/topics/miers/miersindex.htm including briefs submitted and some academic writing.
It’s not as much as we might want to know but it does give us some indication as to her methods of reasoning