<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Do Liberal Blogs Have More Influence?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/10/07/why-do-liberal-blogs-have-more-influence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/07/why-do-liberal-blogs-have-more-influence/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ascap_scab</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/07/why-do-liberal-blogs-have-more-influence/#comment-2779</link>
		<dc:creator>ascap_scab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 05:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/07/why-do-liberal-blogs-have-more-influence/#comment-2779</guid>
		<description>Perhaps "liberal" blogs have more "influence" (whatever that means) because they are more responsive to the "every" man.  Virtually every lefty blog takes comments, even putting up with, and debating resident righty lurkers.

Too many conservative blogs won't take comments for the simple reason they are a "noise machine."  They tell you what to think, no discussion, no analysis, no feedback.  Too many righty bloggers regurgitate the daily talking points, offer up unsubstantiated opinion, and suck up so that "their" leaders might some day deliver on the bloggers narrow single issue raison d' etre.

I guess that didn't work out so well with Bush picking Harriet Miers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps &#8220;liberal&#8221; blogs have more &#8220;influence&#8221; (whatever that means) because they are more responsive to the &#8220;every&#8221; man.  Virtually every lefty blog takes comments, even putting up with, and debating resident righty lurkers.</p>
<p>Too many conservative blogs won&#8217;t take comments for the simple reason they are a &#8220;noise machine.&#8221;  They tell you what to think, no discussion, no analysis, no feedback.  Too many righty bloggers regurgitate the daily talking points, offer up unsubstantiated opinion, and suck up so that &#8220;their&#8221; leaders might some day deliver on the bloggers narrow single issue raison d&#8217; etre.</p>
<p>I guess that didn&#8217;t work out so well with Bush picking Harriet Miers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/07/why-do-liberal-blogs-have-more-influence/#comment-2777</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 02:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/07/why-do-liberal-blogs-have-more-influence/#comment-2777</guid>
		<description>Very interesting. Although I will say that I think many of the leftist radio programs (with the very glaring exception of Randi Rhodes) have good points, but they deliver them in the most caustic ways. Unfortunate indeed, but then again, when you make waves you attract viewers. It's the blessing and curse of the media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting. Although I will say that I think many of the leftist radio programs (with the very glaring exception of Randi Rhodes) have good points, but they deliver them in the most caustic ways. Unfortunate indeed, but then again, when you make waves you attract viewers. It&#8217;s the blessing and curse of the media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/07/why-do-liberal-blogs-have-more-influence/#comment-2776</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 02:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/07/why-do-liberal-blogs-have-more-influence/#comment-2776</guid>
		<description>Kos has a slightly more cynical take on hit, he reckons it's just because Liberal blogs have proved much better at campaign fundraising than Conservative ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kos has a slightly more cynical take on hit, he reckons it&#8217;s just because Liberal blogs have proved much better at campaign fundraising than Conservative ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/07/why-do-liberal-blogs-have-more-influence/#comment-2775</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 01:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/07/why-do-liberal-blogs-have-more-influence/#comment-2775</guid>
		<description>Blogs are a Che Guevarra sort of medium:  they exist out in the hills where they live on rancid pork and frijoles refritos.  The GOP has actual power, the Dems have dreams and resentments.  And the GOP has talk radio to absorb the Right wing cranks, while the Left having no such mechanism generates excess crankitude which fuels the blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogs are a Che Guevarra sort of medium:  they exist out in the hills where they live on rancid pork and frijoles refritos.  The GOP has actual power, the Dems have dreams and resentments.  And the GOP has talk radio to absorb the Right wing cranks, while the Left having no such mechanism generates excess crankitude which fuels the blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.000 seconds -->
