<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conservabloggers On The Meirs Nomination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/conservabloggers-on-the-meirs-nomination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/conservabloggers-on-the-meirs-nomination/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:59:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tommy</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/conservabloggers-on-the-meirs-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-2791</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/conservabloggers-on-the-meirs-nomination/#comment-2791</guid>
		<description>I just read it in a way that sounded like you were trying to say people said she wasn&#039;t very bright, when in fact what they said was she was politely dull, which isn&#039;t necessarily the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read it in a way that sounded like you were trying to say people said she wasn&#8217;t very bright, when in fact what they said was she was politely dull, which isn&#8217;t necessarily the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/conservabloggers-on-the-meirs-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-2790</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 04:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/conservabloggers-on-the-meirs-nomination/#comment-2790</guid>
		<description>Rereading it, I can understand how you could read into that. No worries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rereading it, I can understand how you could read into that. No worries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callimachus</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/conservabloggers-on-the-meirs-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-2789</link>
		<dc:creator>Callimachus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 02:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/conservabloggers-on-the-meirs-nomination/#comment-2789</guid>
		<description>&quot;Welcome to my world&quot; was interpreted on this end as &quot;welcome to my world, where the elitists in your (GOP) party are obvious.&quot; My bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Welcome to my world&#8221; was interpreted on this end as &#8220;welcome to my world, where the elitists in your (GOP) party are obvious.&#8221; My bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/conservabloggers-on-the-meirs-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-2788</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 00:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/conservabloggers-on-the-meirs-nomination/#comment-2788</guid>
		<description>Cal, that&#039;s exactly my point and that&#039;s why I said &quot;Welcome to my world.&quot; Perhaps I&#039;m missing your point.

And Tommy, you&#039;re right, words do have meaning. That&#039;s why I wondered aloud about politely dull. Cal can appreciate this. Dull is the opposite of sharp. And as defined in the OED, it means &quot;Intellectually weak or obtuse; stupid.&quot; And politely means &quot;well mannered&quot;. She could it be said she&#039;s well mannered but stupid? 

However, dull is also used to suggest somebody is boring. I don&#039;t think questioning what this means is inept, especially since I&#039;ve never seen those two words used together before.

Please, give a blogger a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cal, that&#8217;s exactly my point and that&#8217;s why I said &#8220;Welcome to my world.&#8221; Perhaps I&#8217;m missing your point.</p>
<p>And Tommy, you&#8217;re right, words do have meaning. That&#8217;s why I wondered aloud about politely dull. Cal can appreciate this. Dull is the opposite of sharp. And as defined in the OED, it means &#8220;Intellectually weak or obtuse; stupid.&#8221; And politely means &#8220;well mannered&#8221;. She could it be said she&#8217;s well mannered but stupid? </p>
<p>However, dull is also used to suggest somebody is boring. I don&#8217;t think questioning what this means is inept, especially since I&#8217;ve never seen those two words used together before.</p>
<p>Please, give a blogger a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommy</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/conservabloggers-on-the-meirs-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-2787</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2005 21:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/conservabloggers-on-the-meirs-nomination/#comment-2787</guid>
		<description>Politely dull

Maybe it&#039;s just me, but I&#039;d take that as code for politely dull.  Claiming someone is using words to mean something other than what they mean is an inept way of making an argument.  And the more it&#039;s done, the more difficult it becomes to have a conversation because you don&#039;t have a clue what anyone is really saying.  Words have meaning, it&#039;s best to stick to them, unless you have proof they were meant some other way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politely dull</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s just me, but I&#8217;d take that as code for politely dull.  Claiming someone is using words to mean something other than what they mean is an inept way of making an argument.  And the more it&#8217;s done, the more difficult it becomes to have a conversation because you don&#8217;t have a clue what anyone is really saying.  Words have meaning, it&#8217;s best to stick to them, unless you have proof they were meant some other way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callimachus</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/conservabloggers-on-the-meirs-nomination/comment-page-1/#comment-2786</link>
		<dc:creator>Callimachus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2005 20:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/conservabloggers-on-the-meirs-nomination/#comment-2786</guid>
		<description>Be careful with that &quot;elitists&quot; sword, my Democratic friend. It cuts both ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful with that &#8220;elitists&#8221; sword, my Democratic friend. It cuts both ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
