<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dobson Assured Meirs Is Pro-Life?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/dobson-assured-meirs-is-pro-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/dobson-assured-meirs-is-pro-life/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:59:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dobson To Clear Up Meirs Statement</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/dobson-assured-meirs-is-pro-life/comment-page-1/#comment-2811</link>
		<dc:creator>Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dobson To Clear Up Meirs Statement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 04:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/dobson-assured-meirs-is-pro-life/#comment-2811</guid>
		<description>[...] Okay, caught up? I blogged about Meirs and Dobson a couple days ago. Didn&#8217;t read it? Shame on you. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Okay, caught up? I blogged about Meirs and Dobson a couple days ago. Didn&#8217;t read it? Shame on you. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/dobson-assured-meirs-is-pro-life/comment-page-1/#comment-2800</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/dobson-assured-meirs-is-pro-life/#comment-2800</guid>
		<description>Agreed Phillip, but that doesn&#039;t mean she won&#039;t tell them in the proceedings. 

I don&#039;t know, maybe ironic was the wrong word, but certainly interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed Phillip, but that doesn&#8217;t mean she won&#8217;t tell them in the proceedings. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, maybe ironic was the wrong word, but certainly interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/dobson-assured-meirs-is-pro-life/comment-page-1/#comment-2798</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/dobson-assured-meirs-is-pro-life/#comment-2798</guid>
		<description>What is ironic is that although the republican party hollers when democrats try to establish a candidates view on Rowe before deciding on them and now that that position is in question all of a sudden it&#039;s important to know what the candidates position is.  I realize this is not a Republican issue alone, but it does tend to occur at its most grand realization under the Republican leadership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is ironic is that although the republican party hollers when democrats try to establish a candidates view on Rowe before deciding on them and now that that position is in question all of a sudden it&#8217;s important to know what the candidates position is.  I realize this is not a Republican issue alone, but it does tend to occur at its most grand realization under the Republican leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip J. Birmingham</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/dobson-assured-meirs-is-pro-life/comment-page-1/#comment-2795</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip J. Birmingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/09/dobson-assured-meirs-is-pro-life/#comment-2795</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s all that ironic -- if you want a candidate for the SC to be candid about how they&#039;d rule on issues likely to come up, it&#039;s not altogether inconsistent to smell a rat if a candidate tells the President&#039;s buddies, but not you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s all that ironic &#8212; if you want a candidate for the SC to be candid about how they&#8217;d rule on issues likely to come up, it&#8217;s not altogether inconsistent to smell a rat if a candidate tells the President&#8217;s buddies, but not you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
