<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judith Miller Talks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/10/16/judith-miller-talks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/16/judith-miller-talks/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:28:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/16/judith-miller-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-2883</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 01:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/16/judith-miller-talks/#comment-2883</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Judy Miller is a sloppy reporter.  I think she&#039;s a liar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Judy Miller is a sloppy reporter.  I think she&#8217;s a liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callimachus</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/16/judith-miller-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-2871</link>
		<dc:creator>Callimachus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 03:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/16/judith-miller-talks/#comment-2871</guid>
		<description>Sausage factory metaphor. You &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; don&#039;t want to know how this is done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sausage factory metaphor. You <i>really</i> don&#8217;t want to know how this is done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/16/judith-miller-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-2870</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 21:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/16/judith-miller-talks/#comment-2870</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What my editor then told me ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬? and I still find this questionable, though I donÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t know of a better solution ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬? was either to keep everything, every note, every transcript, in order and explicable, or keep nothing. As a consequence, of the hundreds of reportersÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢ notebooks IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢ve filled over the years, I donÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t have a single one.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;ve heard that before, and I think your strategy is perhaps the best. Just chuck it and move on. Of course, I doubt the bigger papers would allow this type of strategy.

You know what they should do? Set up a newspaper wiki where people post their notes, and other fact check em. That way you can do things in real time and see who changed what story at what time. I&#039;m sure newspapers are doing these already, but you usually have to retype your notes into a story anyway. Why not put it in wiki form?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What my editor then told me ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬? and I still find this questionable, though I donÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t know of a better solution ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬? was either to keep everything, every note, every transcript, in order and explicable, or keep nothing. As a consequence, of the hundreds of reportersÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢ notebooks IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢ve filled over the years, I donÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t have a single one.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard that before, and I think your strategy is perhaps the best. Just chuck it and move on. Of course, I doubt the bigger papers would allow this type of strategy.</p>
<p>You know what they should do? Set up a newspaper wiki where people post their notes, and other fact check em. That way you can do things in real time and see who changed what story at what time. I&#8217;m sure newspapers are doing these already, but you usually have to retype your notes into a story anyway. Why not put it in wiki form?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callimachus</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/16/judith-miller-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-2867</link>
		<dc:creator>Callimachus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 20:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/16/judith-miller-talks/#comment-2867</guid>
		<description>As a young reporter, I was warned about what would happen to you on the witness stand if you kept sloppy or incomplete notes. Somehow, Ms. Miller didn&#039;t seem to get this lesson.

What my editor then told me -- and I still find this questionable, though I don&#039;t know of a better solution -- was either to keep everything, every note, every transcript, in order and explicable, or keep nothing. As a consequence, of the hundreds of reporters&#039; notebooks I&#039;ve filled over the years, I don&#039;t have a single one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a young reporter, I was warned about what would happen to you on the witness stand if you kept sloppy or incomplete notes. Somehow, Ms. Miller didn&#8217;t seem to get this lesson.</p>
<p>What my editor then told me &#8212; and I still find this questionable, though I don&#8217;t know of a better solution &#8212; was either to keep everything, every note, every transcript, in order and explicable, or keep nothing. As a consequence, of the hundreds of reporters&#8217; notebooks I&#8217;ve filled over the years, I don&#8217;t have a single one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
