<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheney Definitely Part Of Leak Scandal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/10/25/cheney-definitely-part-of-leak-scandal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/25/cheney-definitely-part-of-leak-scandal/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:39:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Callimachus</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/25/cheney-definitely-part-of-leak-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-3006</link>
		<dc:creator>Callimachus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/25/cheney-definitely-part-of-leak-scandal/#comment-3006</guid>
		<description>What on earth is a &quot;conservablogger&quot;? And does the world really need another demeaning and meaningless political pigeonhole? Would it be worthwhile to ask why there are no &quot;libabloggers&quot; commenting on the article a few items down the list from that, the one titled &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article322108.ece&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Galloway lied over Iraqi oil payments, says Congress report&quot;? Or the one above that, about Iraqi voters approving their constitution? 

Anyway, on the Cheney story I see Opinion Journal and The Corner, which suit most people&#039;s definition of &quot;conservative,&quot; if not &quot;blog,&quot; and Protein Wisdom, Decision &#039;08, and a few others who regularly link with, or agree with, me, which seems to be some people&#039;s definition of &quot;conservative.&quot;

But where are the Kossacks and the Talking Points people on Gorgeous George? Or the voters of Iraq?

We no longer live in a world where people see the same scene and interpret it differently. We live in a world where some of the people don&#039;t even live in the same world.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What on earth is a &#8220;conservablogger&#8221;? And does the world really need another demeaning and meaningless political pigeonhole? Would it be worthwhile to ask why there are no &#8220;libabloggers&#8221; commenting on the article a few items down the list from that, the one titled <a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article322108.ece" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Galloway lied over Iraqi oil payments, says Congress report&#8221;? Or the one above that, about Iraqi voters approving their constitution? </p>
<p>Anyway, on the Cheney story I see Opinion Journal and The Corner, which suit most people&#8217;s definition of &#8220;conservative,&#8221; if not &#8220;blog,&#8221; and Protein Wisdom, Decision &#8216;08, and a few others who regularly link with, or agree with, me, which seems to be some people&#8217;s definition of &#8220;conservative.&#8221;</p>
<p>But where are the Kossacks and the Talking Points people on Gorgeous George? Or the voters of Iraq?</p>
<p>We no longer live in a world where people see the same scene and interpret it differently. We live in a world where some of the people don&#8217;t even live in the same world.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise Best</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/25/cheney-definitely-part-of-leak-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-3005</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise Best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/25/cheney-definitely-part-of-leak-scandal/#comment-3005</guid>
		<description>Because ... conservabloggers sleep in later than liberabloggers!

Essentially we&#039;re looking at a political and policy fight and Mr. Fitzgerald is losing sight of what his role and office should be providing.

There&#039;s an excellent perspective from WSJ Opinion Journal that I&#039;ll be posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because &#8230; conservabloggers sleep in later than liberabloggers!</p>
<p>Essentially we&#8217;re looking at a political and policy fight and Mr. Fitzgerald is losing sight of what his role and office should be providing.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an excellent perspective from WSJ Opinion Journal that I&#8217;ll be posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
