<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheney Definitely Part Of Leak Scandal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/10/25/cheney-definitely-part-of-leak-scandal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/25/cheney-definitely-part-of-leak-scandal/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Callimachus</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/25/cheney-definitely-part-of-leak-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-3006</link>
		<dc:creator>Callimachus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/25/cheney-definitely-part-of-leak-scandal/#comment-3006</guid>
		<description>What on earth is a "conservablogger"? And does the world really need another demeaning and meaningless political pigeonhole? Would it be worthwhile to ask why there are no "libabloggers" commenting on the article a few items down the list from that, the one titled &lt;a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article322108.ece" rel="nofollow"&gt;"Galloway lied over Iraqi oil payments, says Congress report"? Or the one above that, about Iraqi voters approving their constitution? 

Anyway, on the Cheney story I see Opinion Journal and The Corner, which suit most people's definition of "conservative," if not "blog," and Protein Wisdom, Decision '08, and a few others who regularly link with, or agree with, me, which seems to be some people's definition of "conservative."

But where are the Kossacks and the Talking Points people on Gorgeous George? Or the voters of Iraq?

We no longer live in a world where people see the same scene and interpret it differently. We live in a world where some of the people don't even live in the same world.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What on earth is a &#8220;conservablogger&#8221;? And does the world really need another demeaning and meaningless political pigeonhole? Would it be worthwhile to ask why there are no &#8220;libabloggers&#8221; commenting on the article a few items down the list from that, the one titled <a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article322108.ece" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Galloway lied over Iraqi oil payments, says Congress report&#8221;? Or the one above that, about Iraqi voters approving their constitution? </p>
<p>Anyway, on the Cheney story I see Opinion Journal and The Corner, which suit most people&#8217;s definition of &#8220;conservative,&#8221; if not &#8220;blog,&#8221; and Protein Wisdom, Decision &#8216;08, and a few others who regularly link with, or agree with, me, which seems to be some people&#8217;s definition of &#8220;conservative.&#8221;</p>
<p>But where are the Kossacks and the Talking Points people on Gorgeous George? Or the voters of Iraq?</p>
<p>We no longer live in a world where people see the same scene and interpret it differently. We live in a world where some of the people don&#8217;t even live in the same world.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise Best</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/10/25/cheney-definitely-part-of-leak-scandal/comment-page-1/#comment-3005</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise Best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/10/25/cheney-definitely-part-of-leak-scandal/#comment-3005</guid>
		<description>Because ... conservabloggers sleep in later than liberabloggers!

Essentially we're looking at a political and policy fight and Mr. Fitzgerald is losing sight of what his role and office should be providing.

There's an excellent perspective from WSJ Opinion Journal that I'll be posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because &#8230; conservabloggers sleep in later than liberabloggers!</p>
<p>Essentially we&#8217;re looking at a political and policy fight and Mr. Fitzgerald is losing sight of what his role and office should be providing.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an excellent perspective from WSJ Opinion Journal that I&#8217;ll be posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.565 seconds -->
