Comments on: Libby Indicted http://donklephant.com/2005/10/28/libby-indicted/ Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable. Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:24:43 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Justin Gardner http://donklephant.com/2005/10/28/libby-indicted/comment-page-1/#comment-3254 Justin Gardner Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:08:48 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2005/10/28/libby-indicted/#comment-3254 I deleted the majority of the above comment because it's too long and isn't really responding to the post. In the future, the comments section is about commenting. If you want to post a link to this blog, trackbacks work. I deleted the majority of the above comment because it’s too long and isn’t really responding to the post.

In the future, the comments section is about commenting. If you want to post a link to this blog, trackbacks work.

]]> By: kstreetfriend.blogspot.com http://donklephant.com/2005/10/28/libby-indicted/comment-page-1/#comment-3250 kstreetfriend.blogspot.com Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:50:32 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2005/10/28/libby-indicted/#comment-3250 A CIA officer’s name was blown, there was an apparent leak of information to friendly reporters in the national media, national security was at stake, a news reporter was eventually jailed, an administration mover and shaker called: “Scooter� has been indicted for possible obstruction of justice, perjury, and making false statements, and the federal judge assigned to the case was appointed by the same executive branch and had previously served in the White House Media Affairs Office. Is there just too much by happenstance for this to be just a coincidental thing? (Edited by Justin Gardner...see more over at the blog. Just click on the name to go there.) A CIA officer’s name was blown, there was an apparent leak of information to friendly reporters in the national media, national security was at stake, a news reporter was eventually jailed, an administration mover and shaker called: “Scooter� has been indicted for possible obstruction of justice, perjury, and making false statements, and the federal judge assigned to the case was appointed by the same executive branch and had previously served in the White House Media Affairs Office.

Is there just too much by happenstance for this to be just a coincidental thing?

(Edited by Justin Gardner…see more over at the blog. Just click on the name to go there.)

]]>