<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Janet Jackson Says &#8220;No Secret Daughter&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/11/06/janet-jackson-says-no-secret-daughter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/11/06/janet-jackson-says-no-secret-daughter/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:53:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kelvin Quick</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/11/06/janet-jackson-says-no-secret-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-7712</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelvin Quick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/11/06/janet-jackson-says-no-secret-daughter/#comment-7712</guid>
		<description>who cares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who cares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/11/06/janet-jackson-says-no-secret-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-4116</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/11/06/janet-jackson-says-no-secret-daughter/#comment-4116</guid>
		<description>I find it very much strange that one who is related to the party involved as the &quot;uncle and brother&quot;, to not have any truth or knowledge about this issue. Surely he&#039;d have to know the repercussion invloved by divulging such information considered untrue or &quot;silent&quot;. Janet has shown a propensity to keep hidden aspects of her relations as a celebrity in the public image hidden. This a choice in her right to privacy to do so, but why would one hide the facts of being a parent to a child? Is it to protect the childs well being or their own? Some celebrities over the years have went through great lengths to hide the fact of certain indiscretions in their careers. Even hiding the fact the child may have certain &quot;physical and mental&quot; challenges that they&#039;d want hidden from the public. If this story  has any merit in truth, it&#039;s a sad testiment to celebrities penchant for fame and recognition. To then only ask to be &quot;saved&quot; from it later. I hope this is a false statement  for Janets sake cause to hide such thing is a blight on her as a celebrity, and a woman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it very much strange that one who is related to the party involved as the &#8220;uncle and brother&#8221;, to not have any truth or knowledge about this issue. Surely he&#8217;d have to know the repercussion invloved by divulging such information considered untrue or &#8220;silent&#8221;. Janet has shown a propensity to keep hidden aspects of her relations as a celebrity in the public image hidden. This a choice in her right to privacy to do so, but why would one hide the facts of being a parent to a child? Is it to protect the childs well being or their own? Some celebrities over the years have went through great lengths to hide the fact of certain indiscretions in their careers. Even hiding the fact the child may have certain &#8220;physical and mental&#8221; challenges that they&#8217;d want hidden from the public. If this story  has any merit in truth, it&#8217;s a sad testiment to celebrities penchant for fame and recognition. To then only ask to be &#8220;saved&#8221; from it later. I hope this is a false statement  for Janets sake cause to hide such thing is a blight on her as a celebrity, and a woman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
