<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arctic Drilling &#8211; Too Hot to Handle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/11/10/arctic-drilling-too-hot-to-handle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/11/10/arctic-drilling-too-hot-to-handle/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kreiz</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/11/10/arctic-drilling-too-hot-to-handle/comment-page-1/#comment-3615</link>
		<dc:creator>kreiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=1307#comment-3615</guid>
		<description>ford- agree totally.  I&#039;ve seen depictions of ANWR as polar bears romping in the pristine snow.  The real pics of proposed ANWR drililng sites aren&#039;t as sexy- they&#039;re akin more to a frozen western Texas wasteland.  Environmentalists prefer to create Babmi-like images of nature rather than dealing with reality.

The only objection I&#039;ve read is that the minimal ANWR reserves don&#039;t justify the investment.  If it&#039;s private investment, what difference would that make?  That&#039;s an assessment for the private sector.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ford- agree totally.  I&#8217;ve seen depictions of ANWR as polar bears romping in the pristine snow.  The real pics of proposed ANWR drililng sites aren&#8217;t as sexy- they&#8217;re akin more to a frozen western Texas wasteland.  Environmentalists prefer to create Babmi-like images of nature rather than dealing with reality.</p>
<p>The only objection I&#8217;ve read is that the minimal ANWR reserves don&#8217;t justify the investment.  If it&#8217;s private investment, what difference would that make?  That&#8217;s an assessment for the private sector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ford4x4</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/11/10/arctic-drilling-too-hot-to-handle/comment-page-1/#comment-3610</link>
		<dc:creator>ford4x4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=1307#comment-3610</guid>
		<description>How is it that the enviromentalists have gained such a stranglehold on the economy of this country?   They, apparently, are now even able to control members of the Republican party.   There has to be &lt;i&gt;something shady going on in congress.   I haven&#039;t hear 1 reasonable argument yet against drilling in ANWR.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it that the enviromentalists have gained such a stranglehold on the economy of this country?   They, apparently, are now even able to control members of the Republican party.   There has to be <i>something shady going on in congress.   I haven&#8217;t hear 1 reasonable argument yet against drilling in ANWR.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kreiz</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/11/10/arctic-drilling-too-hot-to-handle/comment-page-1/#comment-3608</link>
		<dc:creator>kreiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=1307#comment-3608</guid>
		<description>Denise- I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a Pollyannish question at all.  I&#039;ve read articles that claim that the ANWR drilling site would be the approximate size of Dulles Airport.  Given Alaska&#039;s size, this seems de minimis.  It&#039;s possible that there are countervailing concerns.  My sense is that ANWR has become a symbolic abstraction for the Left and the Right.  It&#039;s most reasonable to toss out the symbols, roll up our sleeves and look at the facts.  If the environmental impact is excessive, don&#039;t drill.  If not, reach compromises.  If the Left is truly &quot;reality based&quot;, as it claims, this process should be acceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denise- I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a Pollyannish question at all.  I&#8217;ve read articles that claim that the ANWR drilling site would be the approximate size of Dulles Airport.  Given Alaska&#8217;s size, this seems de minimis.  It&#8217;s possible that there are countervailing concerns.  My sense is that ANWR has become a symbolic abstraction for the Left and the Right.  It&#8217;s most reasonable to toss out the symbols, roll up our sleeves and look at the facts.  If the environmental impact is excessive, don&#8217;t drill.  If not, reach compromises.  If the Left is truly &#8220;reality based&#8221;, as it claims, this process should be acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

