“Terrorism” and “Islamic Supremicism” are just racist terms used by neo-con zionist fascists (i.e. capitaliststs) so they can drum up support and conquer the worlds oil supply.

These “terrorists” are actually the Revolution, fighting for social justice in the third world. How do I know that? Well isn’t it obvious – they are poor, exotic, and brown skinned. Bad guys can only be rich, white, or jewish. Where have you been for the past 1000 years?

Back me up Curtis!!

I suppose Tony Blair and John Howard had equally silly reasons for going to war. You might recall that the United Nations passed resolution 1441 that called on Saddam to come clean on its WMD programs and cease its massive human rights violations or face severe consequences. Did Saddam comply? No. Did the Senate vote on going to war? Yes. So, it’s pathetic to think that Bush acted unilaterally.

WW2 ended Nazism and Japanese imperialism. The Huns are no longer putting Jews in gas ovens and the Japs are no longer raping and pillaging in China. Back then our forefathers had guts and Democrats were hawks. Now the party of Roosevelt, Truman and Kennedy will go down in history as the White-flag Democrats.

The long-term mission is to destroy the totalitarian ideology of Islamic Supremacy and all those who preach it. If it can’t be done you will eventually have to choose between living in Dhimmitude, having your head cut-off or converting to the most virulent form of Islam.

Curtis Walter

Personally, I don’t see how this vote will have any impact at all on Clinton, Kerry or Biden.

How curious was Congress about all this at the time? “Congress was entitled to view the 92-page National Intelligence Estimate about Iraq before the October 2002 vote. But, as The Washington Post reported last year, no more than six senators and a handful of House members read beyond the five-page executive summary.”

Further Kerry’s argument that his vote only authorised the war if it was necessary should actually hold water. Saying “I authorised force to give the executive the bargaining power it should have”, while trusting that that power would be used responsiby gives him (and others) the right to get angry and recant if they see that power being used irresponsibly. And much of the information on which such a judgement could be made has only come to light in the years since the war.

‘I doubt any will ever say, “I voted to cover myself: If the war proved swift and relatively low-cost like Bosnia or Afghanistan, I was on record for it; if it got bad like Mogadishu or Lebanon, then I wasn’t the commander-in-chief who conducted it.”‘

I say, Rudy in 2008.