<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pelosi Backs Quick Iraq Pullout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/12/01/pelosi-backs-quick-iraq-pullout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/12/01/pelosi-backs-quick-iraq-pullout/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Gallagher</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/12/01/pelosi-backs-quick-iraq-pullout/comment-page-1/#comment-4255</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Gallagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/12/01/pelosi-backs-quick-iraq-pullout/#comment-4255</guid>
		<description>Murtha&#039;s plan makes sense on the assumption that the Iraqi &quot;insurgents&quot; are motivated by the presence of US troops.  No troops, no insurgency, no need to call on the &quot;over the horizon&quot; US force.  But if that assumption is wrong--the view of the hawk side of the argument--the bad guys will keep fighting for their own reasons and we&#039;d have to go right back in with a worse position than before we left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murtha&#8217;s plan makes sense on the assumption that the Iraqi &#8220;insurgents&#8221; are motivated by the presence of US troops.  No troops, no insurgency, no need to call on the &#8220;over the horizon&#8221; US force.  But if that assumption is wrong&#8211;the view of the hawk side of the argument&#8211;the bad guys will keep fighting for their own reasons and we&#8217;d have to go right back in with a worse position than before we left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rigel</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/12/01/pelosi-backs-quick-iraq-pullout/comment-page-1/#comment-4230</link>
		<dc:creator>Rigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 15:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/12/01/pelosi-backs-quick-iraq-pullout/#comment-4230</guid>
		<description>I think its another example of politicians trying to &quot;energize thier base&quot;.  But atleast is an alternative plan.  More politicians need to get off the sidelines and start discussing the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its another example of politicians trying to &#8220;energize thier base&#8221;.  But atleast is an alternative plan.  More politicians need to get off the sidelines and start discussing the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

