<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dems Split On Iraq Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2005/12/07/dems-split-on-iraq-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/12/07/dems-split-on-iraq-policy/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Search engine internet marketing strategy</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/12/07/dems-split-on-iraq-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-6544</link>
		<dc:creator>Search engine internet marketing strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/12/07/dems-split-on-iraq-policy/#comment-6544</guid>
		<description>Hi, I thought I'd just leave this message on your blog. I hope you don't mind. I've been trying to find blogs where people are talking about &lt;a href="http://www.search-engine-marketing-firm.biz" rel="nofollow"&gt;Search engine internet marketing strategy&lt;/a&gt; and when I was looking, I found this one on this post. You have helped me in some way. Anyway, I want to say thank you before I go off to find some more info about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I thought I&#8217;d just leave this message on your blog. I hope you don&#8217;t mind. I&#8217;ve been trying to find blogs where people are talking about <a href="http://www.search-engine-marketing-firm.biz" rel="nofollow">Search engine internet marketing strategy</a> and when I was looking, I found this one on this post. You have helped me in some way. Anyway, I want to say thank you before I go off to find some more info about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alice</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2005/12/07/dems-split-on-iraq-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-4420</link>
		<dc:creator>alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2005/12/07/dems-split-on-iraq-policy/#comment-4420</guid>
		<description>If Democrats have any sense they will not regard division as a weakness, but as a reflection of reasonable people.   It is impossible to really know what to do.

Democratic failure has been that they have not focused on the large number of very large issues not dealt with by grand gestures, but pragmatic efforts.

Clark is right about the concerns over Irainian influence.  However he seems to have ignored the fact that the new Iraqi government has made extensiive trade agreements, promised that Iraq would not be used for attacks and even been forced to cancel a military training pact.  So our ability to implement this program or even if accepted to seal borders is questionable.

Indeee I would suggest that the success in the west may be less than he indicates so while the problem is real the proposed solution is at best partial.

Once again knowing what to do is difficult and even the best informed people are making educated guesses though they may hold to these strongly.

One foort to watch is the British in Basra.  They are evidently tring to purge Sadrist elements from the police and have dispatched a chief constable with experience in N. Ireland to enact reforms.   I think this is a good program, I am skeptical that it can succeed.

A "realistic" policy would also congratulate Bush on admitting that most of the insurgency is local and that economic progress is uneven.  These are the kind of details necessary for ... I would like to say success, but... at least less undesirible results or a bit more hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Democrats have any sense they will not regard division as a weakness, but as a reflection of reasonable people.   It is impossible to really know what to do.</p>
<p>Democratic failure has been that they have not focused on the large number of very large issues not dealt with by grand gestures, but pragmatic efforts.</p>
<p>Clark is right about the concerns over Irainian influence.  However he seems to have ignored the fact that the new Iraqi government has made extensiive trade agreements, promised that Iraq would not be used for attacks and even been forced to cancel a military training pact.  So our ability to implement this program or even if accepted to seal borders is questionable.</p>
<p>Indeee I would suggest that the success in the west may be less than he indicates so while the problem is real the proposed solution is at best partial.</p>
<p>Once again knowing what to do is difficult and even the best informed people are making educated guesses though they may hold to these strongly.</p>
<p>One foort to watch is the British in Basra.  They are evidently tring to purge Sadrist elements from the police and have dispatched a chief constable with experience in N. Ireland to enact reforms.   I think this is a good program, I am skeptical that it can succeed.</p>
<p>A &#8220;realistic&#8221; policy would also congratulate Bush on admitting that most of the insurgency is local and that economic progress is uneven.  These are the kind of details necessary for &#8230; I would like to say success, but&#8230; at least less undesirible results or a bit more hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.591 seconds -->
