<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dems In 2006?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2006/02/12/dems-in-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/02/12/dems-in-2006/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Angry Middle</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/02/12/dems-in-2006/#comment-6508</link>
		<dc:creator>The Angry Middle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 05:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/02/12/dems-in-2006/#comment-6508</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Poll Position&lt;/strong&gt;

	Can the Democrats solve their strategic issues and add some balance to the political scene? Donklephant asks the question, and has some poll numbers that suggest they might have an opportunity, but I&#8217;m still concerned about their overall ability...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Poll Position</strong></p>
<p>	Can the Democrats solve their strategic issues and add some balance to the political scene? Donklephant asks the question, and has some poll numbers that suggest they might have an opportunity, but I&#8217;m still concerned about their overall ability&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capitol Annex &#187; Blog Archive &#187; From The Blogs, February 12, 2006 (Afternoon)</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/02/12/dems-in-2006/#comment-6488</link>
		<dc:creator>Capitol Annex &#187; Blog Archive &#187; From The Blogs, February 12, 2006 (Afternoon)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/02/12/dems-in-2006/#comment-6488</guid>
		<description>[...] Donklephant (a new blog I ran across last week) has a post up about a new Pew poll that gives Democrats something to smile about. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Donklephant (a new blog I ran across last week) has a post up about a new Pew poll that gives Democrats something to smile about. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Strong</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/02/12/dems-in-2006/#comment-6484</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 19:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/02/12/dems-in-2006/#comment-6484</guid>
		<description>Tom and Jimmy are right. I want a better-balanced government too; yet at the same time, I also want the Democrats to wise up. Instead, I worry that they're dumbing down. 

That said, according to Rasmussen &lt;a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/2006/Election%20Polls%202006.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;polling&lt;/a&gt; the Democrats are looking strong in a large number of specific races.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom and Jimmy are right. I want a better-balanced government too; yet at the same time, I also want the Democrats to wise up. Instead, I worry that they&#8217;re dumbing down. </p>
<p>That said, according to Rasmussen <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/2006/Election%20Polls%202006.htm" rel="nofollow">polling</a> the Democrats are looking strong in a large number of specific races.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy the Dhimmi</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/02/12/dems-in-2006/#comment-6478</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy the Dhimmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 17:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/02/12/dems-in-2006/#comment-6478</guid>
		<description>Generic ballots put the dems ahead in both 2002 and 2004.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generic ballots put the dems ahead in both 2002 and 2004.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/02/12/dems-in-2006/#comment-6470</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/02/12/dems-in-2006/#comment-6470</guid>
		<description>The trick is, people say they want a change, but when it comes to their representatives, they usually vote for the incumbent anyway. For instance, I don't think my Rep (Bartlett, a Republican) is doing a terrible job - I think he's a pretty good influence on the Republican party, despite getting whipped into line most of the time.  So it means I have to be pissed enough at the Republican Party to kick him out anyway... For me, I'm about at that point, but I doubt there are enough like minded people in my pretty conservative district to make a difference.

I think if the Democrats pick up one of the two houses, they'd be lucky as hell - as would be the rest of the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trick is, people say they want a change, but when it comes to their representatives, they usually vote for the incumbent anyway. For instance, I don&#8217;t think my Rep (Bartlett, a Republican) is doing a terrible job - I think he&#8217;s a pretty good influence on the Republican party, despite getting whipped into line most of the time.  So it means I have to be pissed enough at the Republican Party to kick him out anyway&#8230; For me, I&#8217;m about at that point, but I doubt there are enough like minded people in my pretty conservative district to make a difference.</p>
<p>I think if the Democrats pick up one of the two houses, they&#8217;d be lucky as hell - as would be the rest of the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.751 seconds -->
