<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Presidential Popularity Contest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2006/02/14/the-presidential-popularity-contest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/02/14/the-presidential-popularity-contest/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathon York</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/02/14/the-presidential-popularity-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-6624</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathon York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/02/14/the-presidential-popularity-contest/#comment-6624</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t tested Al Gore, but ideological purity doesn&#039;t seem to have been a feature of John Kerry&#039;s tenure in the Senate.  Instead, his sponsorship record suggests one who reacted to events rather than maintained an ideological line.

But you may be right; He might have been more consistent than Gore.
I&#039;d have to find a way to put Gore to the same test.

More here:
http://theleotest.typepad.com/the_leo_test/2005/07/case_study_john.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t tested Al Gore, but ideological purity doesn&#8217;t seem to have been a feature of John Kerry&#8217;s tenure in the Senate.  Instead, his sponsorship record suggests one who reacted to events rather than maintained an ideological line.</p>
<p>But you may be right; He might have been more consistent than Gore.<br />
I&#8217;d have to find a way to put Gore to the same test.</p>
<p>More here:<br />
<a href="http://theleotest.typepad.com/the_leo_test/2005/07/case_study_john.html" >http://theleotest.typepad.com/the_leo_test/2005/07/case_study_john.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/02/14/the-presidential-popularity-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-6618</link>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/02/14/the-presidential-popularity-contest/#comment-6618</guid>
		<description>As a Canadian (american mother) educated at Stanford, I take a 
peek fondly at events down your way, and I hope for a much more JFK or FDR level of leadership, or the world is in worse trouble than i think it already is! Surfing around, listening to speeches, I like McCain. I also like Gov Mark Warren from Virginia who has been the centermost of the centermost and who, say with a running mate like the experienced Sam Nunn, would be more formidable a team than Hillary Clinton, imho. My guess is the GOP would more easily beat Hillary, but someone like Mark Warren might get them worrying. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Canadian (american mother) educated at Stanford, I take a<br />
peek fondly at events down your way, and I hope for a much more JFK or FDR level of leadership, or the world is in worse trouble than i think it already is! Surfing around, listening to speeches, I like McCain. I also like Gov Mark Warren from Virginia who has been the centermost of the centermost and who, say with a running mate like the experienced Sam Nunn, would be more formidable a team than Hillary Clinton, imho. My guess is the GOP would more easily beat Hillary, but someone like Mark Warren might get them worrying. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Markland</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/02/14/the-presidential-popularity-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-6585</link>
		<dc:creator>David Markland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/02/14/the-presidential-popularity-contest/#comment-6585</guid>
		<description>&quot;Kerry (who lost to Bush far worse than did Gore)&quot;

I don&#039;t think the term &quot;far worse&quot; really applies the two tightest elections in US Presidential history. But it is a surprise in some ways how much better liked Kerry is. I think this has more to do with who Dems think have a better shot at the Presidency, as my impression is that Gore is much better liked, but Kerry, like you said, is fresher meat.

I also think Condi&#039;s numbers will go up, while Rudy&#039;s numbers will go down, as Republicans realize they may get a healthy amount of Dem votes. Rudy, on the other hand, went from the darling bud with a clear shot at the Presidency to just another partisan politico when stumping for Bush in 2004.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Kerry (who lost to Bush far worse than did Gore)&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the term &#8220;far worse&#8221; really applies the two tightest elections in US Presidential history. But it is a surprise in some ways how much better liked Kerry is. I think this has more to do with who Dems think have a better shot at the Presidency, as my impression is that Gore is much better liked, but Kerry, like you said, is fresher meat.</p>
<p>I also think Condi&#8217;s numbers will go up, while Rudy&#8217;s numbers will go down, as Republicans realize they may get a healthy amount of Dem votes. Rudy, on the other hand, went from the darling bud with a clear shot at the Presidency to just another partisan politico when stumping for Bush in 2004.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capitol Annex &#187; Blog Archive &#187; From The Blogs, February 14, 2006 (Afternoon)</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/02/14/the-presidential-popularity-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-6581</link>
		<dc:creator>Capitol Annex &#187; Blog Archive &#187; From The Blogs, February 14, 2006 (Afternoon)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/02/14/the-presidential-popularity-contest/#comment-6581</guid>
		<description>[...] Donkelephant has some &#8216;08 presidential poll numbers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Donkelephant has some &#8216;08 presidential poll numbers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
