<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Voice Against Torture Policies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2006/02/20/another-voice-against-the-torture-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/02/20/another-voice-against-the-torture-policy/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/02/20/another-voice-against-the-torture-policy/#comment-6846</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 13:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/02/20/another-voice-against-the-torture-policy/#comment-6846</guid>
		<description>there's more:
&lt;blockquote&gt;"Without MoraÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s knowledge, the Pentagon had pursued a secret detention policy. There was one version, enunciated in HaynesÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s letter to Leahy, aimed at critics. And there was another, giving the operations officers legal indemnity to engage in cruel interrogations, and, when the Commander-in-Chief deemed it necessary, in torture. Legal critics within the Administration had been allowed to think that they were engaged in a meaningful process; but their deliberations appeared to have been largely an academic exercise, or, worse, a charade."&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You would think this is all you would see on TV, but suspect this will be an inconsequential blip.

I would be interested in Denise's take on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there&#8217;s more:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Without MoraÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s knowledge, the Pentagon had pursued a secret detention policy. There was one version, enunciated in HaynesÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s letter to Leahy, aimed at critics. And there was another, giving the operations officers legal indemnity to engage in cruel interrogations, and, when the Commander-in-Chief deemed it necessary, in torture. Legal critics within the Administration had been allowed to think that they were engaged in a meaningful process; but their deliberations appeared to have been largely an academic exercise, or, worse, a charade.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>You would think this is all you would see on TV, but suspect this will be an inconsequential blip.</p>
<p>I would be interested in Denise&#8217;s take on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.200 seconds -->
