Comments on: No, Wait

By: Callimachus

Callimachus — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 07:56:38 +0000

The only thing in the article that I object to is him whizzing on Winnie the Pooh. That is WAY out of line.

It figures. That was the only thing I liked.

By: Meredith

Meredith — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 15:41:11 +0000

Brian – seriously. Bill Clinton gropes women – hah, hah, hah. We get it. Enough already.

This does not seem that repulsive to me, maybe because it’s quite common for a really “religious” person to turn out to be a bastard.

The only thing in the article that I object to is him whizzing on Winnie the Pooh. That is WAY out of line.

By: Brian in MA

Brian in MA — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 01:26:34 +0000

So then, we’ve basically got Bill Clinton as an artist.

Repulsive indeed, repulsive indeed.

By: Callimachus

Callimachus — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 01:20:57 +0000

Actually the most repulsive bit is the art he makes. You should see it. Phew. My mother and my aunt love it. They also love Rod Stewart demolishing old jazz standards, so there you go.

By: probligo

probligo — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 00:02:09 +0000

Which IS the repulsive bit?

That he makes money from art?

That he uses religion to sell his work?

That he urinates in public places to “mark territory”?

His business practices?

That he gropes women?

All of the above?

By: Justin Gardner

Justin Gardner — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 22:40:56 +0000

Who knew? Thomas Kinkade gives Picasso a run for his money….