Religious Politics Starting To Wear Thin?

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in General Politics, Religion

From Wayne Besen:

In Annapolis, (Capital of) Maryland, at a hearing on the proposed Constitutional Amendment to prohibit gay marriage, Jamie Raskin, professor of law at AU, was requested to testify and he did so.

At the conclusion of his testimony, a right-wing senator rose to say, “Mr. Raskin, my Bible says that marriage shall occur only between a man and a woman. What do you have to say about that?”

Raskin: “Senator, when you took your oath of office, you placed your hand on the Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution. You did not place your hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible.”

The pendulum is swinging back. Thank God.

(h/t: Andrew Sullivan)

This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 14th, 2006 and is filed under General Politics, Religion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

7 Responses to “Religious Politics Starting To Wear Thin?”

  1. Gratis Says:

    I love it!

  2. JollyRoger Says:

    Don’t count Jesusistan out.

    They know that when the Chimperor goes, so does most of their influence. So expect some really draconian stuff to come out of Jesusistan over the next couple of years.

  3. Meredith Says:

    Good one, Raskin!

  4. David Says:

    Raskin’s quote is awesome - nicely said, and quite pointed.

    JollyRoger, your word choice made me have to read your comment several times before I understood it. The namecalling doesn’t add anything of value, and makes it easy to dismiss comments as childish.

  5. Justin Gardner Says:

    Agreed David. This isn’t a site for those kinds of comments. You can make them, sure, but people aren’t going to respond favorably to them. Save it for partisan sites JR.

  6. Meredith Says:

    I know that JollyRoger’s comments are not appropriate for this site, but for the record, I thought the words “Chimperor” and “Jesusistan” were on point (and funny).

    Plus, certain other people that frequently comment on this site are allowed to get away with using words that are demeaning to us liberals, and they’re words aren’t nearly as funny as JollyRoger’s (according to me, of course).

  7. Justin Gardner Says:

    Hey, you can only tell people so many times what’s appropriate. After that you’re just throwing noise down a hole.

    Meredith, liberals would do themselves a big favor by stopping the name calling and talking more about substance. And the chimp thing has NEVER been funny to me. Ugh.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: