<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conservative Texas Democrat Talks Semantics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2006/03/21/conservative-texas-democrat-talks-semantics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/03/21/conservative-texas-democrat-talks-semantics/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/03/21/conservative-texas-democrat-talks-semantics/#comment-8828</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 18:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/03/21/conservative-texas-democrat-talks-semantics/#comment-8828</guid>
		<description>Meredith, you point out the danger in the tactics I was admiring above.  If beating up straw-men is an acceptable substitute for discussion of the issues, then there is room for dialogue.  The result is absurd situations like the one you describe, feeding hungry people must be a "Democrat thing".  That said, I still wish dems were better at framing their positions and attaching the other side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meredith, you point out the danger in the tactics I was admiring above.  If beating up straw-men is an acceptable substitute for discussion of the issues, then there is room for dialogue.  The result is absurd situations like the one you describe, feeding hungry people must be a &#8220;Democrat thing&#8221;.  That said, I still wish dems were better at framing their positions and attaching the other side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meredith</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/03/21/conservative-texas-democrat-talks-semantics/#comment-8822</link>
		<dc:creator>Meredith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/03/21/conservative-texas-democrat-talks-semantics/#comment-8822</guid>
		<description>This just reminds me that at the place I work (which is for a state court of appeals), we are not allowed to belong to or promote any organizations that would be considered partisan.  For example:  I cannot donate money to the "One" campaign because it is considered liberal.  If you haven't heard of the "One" campaign, it is an organization to end world hunger, particularly in Africa.  If I were a conservative, I would be angry about the obvious implications of that rule.  As a liberal, I am frustrated that I can't be involved in volunteer-type organizations because they are considered to be too liberal.  However, what does this say about the state of our two-party system?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just reminds me that at the place I work (which is for a state court of appeals), we are not allowed to belong to or promote any organizations that would be considered partisan.  For example:  I cannot donate money to the &#8220;One&#8221; campaign because it is considered liberal.  If you haven&#8217;t heard of the &#8220;One&#8221; campaign, it is an organization to end world hunger, particularly in Africa.  If I were a conservative, I would be angry about the obvious implications of that rule.  As a liberal, I am frustrated that I can&#8217;t be involved in volunteer-type organizations because they are considered to be too liberal.  However, what does this say about the state of our two-party system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy the Dhimmi</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/03/21/conservative-texas-democrat-talks-semantics/#comment-8806</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy the Dhimmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/03/21/conservative-texas-democrat-talks-semantics/#comment-8806</guid>
		<description>Set up the straw man, knock him down!  Only Democrats care about the poor and downtrodden, because the only solution to poverty is government mediated income redistribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Set up the straw man, knock him down!  Only Democrats care about the poor and downtrodden, because the only solution to poverty is government mediated income redistribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/03/21/conservative-texas-democrat-talks-semantics/#comment-8802</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/03/21/conservative-texas-democrat-talks-semantics/#comment-8802</guid>
		<description>This guy is good.  He articulates his position and that of his party in a way that makes his oponents seem shortsighted and heartless.  Democrats on the national stage should take note, this is how you frame an issue.  Whether or not what he's saying is true, it's at least compelling.  I wish the rest of the Democrats were this good at articulating their views.  Of course I live in NY and never heard of Pete Laney before so I don't know if this is the exception of the rule for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This guy is good.  He articulates his position and that of his party in a way that makes his oponents seem shortsighted and heartless.  Democrats on the national stage should take note, this is how you frame an issue.  Whether or not what he&#8217;s saying is true, it&#8217;s at least compelling.  I wish the rest of the Democrats were this good at articulating their views.  Of course I live in NY and never heard of Pete Laney before so I don&#8217;t know if this is the exception of the rule for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/03/21/conservative-texas-democrat-talks-semantics/#comment-8773</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 06:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/03/21/conservative-texas-democrat-talks-semantics/#comment-8773</guid>
		<description>Hey qatwoman, this is a blog where that type of commenting is frowned upon. Make your point and make it well, but leave the name calling at home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey qatwoman, this is a blog where that type of commenting is frowned upon. Make your point and make it well, but leave the name calling at home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qatwoman</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/03/21/conservative-texas-democrat-talks-semantics/#comment-8770</link>
		<dc:creator>qatwoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 05:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/03/21/conservative-texas-democrat-talks-semantics/#comment-8770</guid>
		<description>Just typical repugNUT hypocracy at work against the less fortunate.....and they LIKE to call themselves "Christians". Laughable in my opinion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just typical repugNUT hypocracy at work against the less fortunate&#8230;..and they LIKE to call themselves &#8220;Christians&#8221;. Laughable in my opinion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.371 seconds -->
