Rice leaked defense info to AIPAC “lobbyist”/”spy”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/21/AR2006042101648_pf.html

F*** THE CHRISTIAN/ZIONIST SPIES AND TRAITORS

Oh well. Keep commenting, but I’d suggest you’d really try to have earnest conversations instead of what you’ve been contributing so far.

You have to fight fire with fire;

Fighting fire with fire seems like the “two wrongs make a right” strategy. I just don’t think that’ll help. Also, we don’t represent fence sitting or compromises. More than anything, we’re about creating a forum where there’s an open dialogue. We listen instead of name call. That doesn’t mean we agree all the time. Far from it, and you’ll see that in many of the comment threads. We actually have genuine debate, instead of the bomb-throwing that defines the rest of the blogosphere. And I wouldn’t give that up for anything.

Nonetheless, banning him over the above comments is even more amusing. What policy applies here: agree or be gone?

Agree or be gone? Perhaps you haven’t been reading the comments. The point of this site is to open up a forum for earnest debate, free from the venom that defines most other blogs. Trust me, we disagree constantly on this blog, but we do it with civility and respect. Well, most of the time at least…

Listen, DAV clearly crossed the line. If this were in a real world forum, his language and insults wouldn’t be tolerated. Why should the blogosphere be any different?

“See, this is what I love. Dav couldn’t contain himself and so his words speak directly to why our site is so desperately needed.

Have fun over at the Kos because you won’t be commenting here again!”

If the truth be told, I stumbled upon this site because Dav or Dave’s site was so ridiculous I thought I’d amuse myself by following his trail. Nonetheless, banning him over the above comments is even more amusing. What policy applies here: agree or be gone? Most would relish the opportunity to clock, again and again, an opponet that at worst makes their case. In any event, good luck with that.

Have fun over at the Kos because you won’t be commenting here again!

Your blog is for analogous to Vichy France.

What an odd sort of statement, considering whithering contempt for moderates and centrists was such a defining quality of fascism.

Eat Shit you fascist enabler!

This new brand of angry liberal is a much needed reaction to the far right.

Shame on you for not seeing this.

You got me Dav. Reacting to the demagogues on the far right with demagogues of our own is exactly what we need. Because spin is much better than reason.

In any event, we’ll be here when you get sick of it too.

Shame on you for not seeing this.

I checked out a republican supporting blog called misunderestimated just now which refers to those taking part in the immigration marches in L.A as, and I quote ‘cockroaches swarming in broad daylight’. Now that’s extreme.

Cian, I’m a Democrat. That’s why I talk about Kos. Of course there are hacks on the right too.

And by the way, just because Kos isn’t part of the far left doesn’t mean he doesn’t APPEAL to that base and rally them. And again, the far left represents a very small group, while independents and moderate Dems represent the majority.

By the way, good thoughts all around. I’m glad we’re continuing to have this debate.

One question, you think you could have this debate on many other sites than Donklephant?

Can’t find misunderestimated.* In any event, I’m not sure that’s an inaccurate characterization of a group of people who fall into one of three categories: they are either (a) violating the law by having illegally entered the country, (b) abusing their 1A rights by *advocating* violating the law or (c) engaging in the transparent and disingenuous sophistry of trying to turn a matter of law into an issue of race or ethnicity. Given the number of Americans who don’t take kindly to lawbreaking and/or race-baiting, I’m not sure it’s very extreme, either.

Tom – replace the word centrists with republicans and you have a fair, one sentence description of the curent administration.

I don’t want another six years of him bashing Democrats on Fox News next to a fawning Sean Hannity.�

Kreiz – it would be a nice thing to see NO ONE next to a fawning Sean Hannity.

This, from 1/27/05 Daily Kos, written by Kos himself:

“Republicans love [Lieberman] for the same reason that Democrats love McCain — because they both spend a great deal of the time beating up publicly on their own party. But for that reason, especially given our minority status (when the party needs to stick together for survival), Lieberman must go. I don’t want another six years of him bashing Democrats on Fox News next to a fawning Sean Hannity.”

Here’s the link: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/1/27/124818/547