<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discuss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:39:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ldh</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/comment-page-1/#comment-12188</link>
		<dc:creator>ldh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 03:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/#comment-12188</guid>
		<description>Hello everybody, I want to make friend with you. Nice to meet you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello everybody, I want to make friend with you. Nice to meet you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GN</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11295</link>
		<dc:creator>GN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 21:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/#comment-11295</guid>
		<description>ASC has it right. Not deserving of any expenditure of money for the book or energy to read it. No value there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ASC has it right. Not deserving of any expenditure of money for the book or energy to read it. No value there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip J. Birmingham</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11266</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip J. Birmingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 19:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/#comment-11266</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Has anyone read the book, yet?&lt;/em&gt;

No.  I wouldn&#039;t read a letter that started &quot;Dear Asshole,&quot; either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Has anyone read the book, yet?</em></p>
<p>No.  I wouldn&#8217;t read a letter that started &#8220;Dear Asshole,&#8221; either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meredith</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11265</link>
		<dc:creator>Meredith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 18:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/#comment-11265</guid>
		<description>Brian,
Your number three was interesting.  What do you mean by &quot;pushing feminist agendas rather than educating to a level considered literate.&quot;  It sounds like you have specific example and a specific beef.  Please do share.  It seems like you&#039;re saying the number one problem with public schools is that they cater to girls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,<br />
Your number three was interesting.  What do you mean by &#8220;pushing feminist agendas rather than educating to a level considered literate.&#8221;  It sounds like you have specific example and a specific beef.  Please do share.  It seems like you&#8217;re saying the number one problem with public schools is that they cater to girls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DosPeros</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11254</link>
		<dc:creator>DosPeros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 17:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/#comment-11254</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the contents should be disgarded simply because it has a provocative title.  Sure, he could have titled it:  &quot;How Centralized Planning and Paternal Statism Has a Profoundly Negative Influence on the Future of Society&quot; but I don&#039;t think it would sell as well as &quot;Liberalism Kills Kids.&quot;  We shouldn&#039;t get our panties in a bunch because of obnoxious marketing.  Has anyone read the book, yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the contents should be disgarded simply because it has a provocative title.  Sure, he could have titled it:  &#8220;How Centralized Planning and Paternal Statism Has a Profoundly Negative Influence on the Future of Society&#8221; but I don&#8217;t think it would sell as well as &#8220;Liberalism Kills Kids.&#8221;  We shouldn&#8217;t get our panties in a bunch because of obnoxious marketing.  Has anyone read the book, yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Stewart Carl</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11250</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Stewart Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 17:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/#comment-11250</guid>
		<description>This is why you can&#039;t take somone like Scarborough seriously.

But I am regularly amused/disturbed by how a lot of conservative writers have started blaming liberalism for causing the very problems liberals generally seek to cure (poverty, racial strife, etc.). It works because there is a bit of truth to it when you start examining why and how something like entrenched poverty stays entrenched. But instead of engaging in a debate about how we might handle our problems better and trying to respectfully woo people to a revised view of the world, people like Scarborough would rather just accuse liberalism of being a homocidal ideology.

That&#039;ll improve America. Sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why you can&#8217;t take somone like Scarborough seriously.</p>
<p>But I am regularly amused/disturbed by how a lot of conservative writers have started blaming liberalism for causing the very problems liberals generally seek to cure (poverty, racial strife, etc.). It works because there is a bit of truth to it when you start examining why and how something like entrenched poverty stays entrenched. But instead of engaging in a debate about how we might handle our problems better and trying to respectfully woo people to a revised view of the world, people like Scarborough would rather just accuse liberalism of being a homocidal ideology.</p>
<p>That&#8217;ll improve America. Sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11247</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 16:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/#comment-11247</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just impressed that the publisher was able to find all of those &quot;Keep Left&quot; signs for the cover.  Do we actually have any of those in America?  I don&#039;t know as if I&#039;ve ever seen one.

As far as the title goes, nothing surprising.  It&#039;s shade more silly than a Coulter title, but not by much.  Next will probably be a book titled, &quot;Jesus loves everyone.  Except liberals.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just impressed that the publisher was able to find all of those &#8220;Keep Left&#8221; signs for the cover.  Do we actually have any of those in America?  I don&#8217;t know as if I&#8217;ve ever seen one.</p>
<p>As far as the title goes, nothing surprising.  It&#8217;s shade more silly than a Coulter title, but not by much.  Next will probably be a book titled, &#8220;Jesus loves everyone.  Except liberals.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11235</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/#comment-11235</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢d say generally speaking, that the statement is on the mark.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh Brian. We can always count on you.

&lt;blockquote&gt;By the way. For clarityÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s sake, IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢m talking about the new liberalism that has swept the country, not the classical liberalism of Adam Smith. You know, with freedom comes responsibility and all that rot.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Don&#039;t care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢d say generally speaking, that the statement is on the mark.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh Brian. We can always count on you.</p>
<blockquote><p>By the way. For clarityÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s sake, IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢m talking about the new liberalism that has swept the country, not the classical liberalism of Adam Smith. You know, with freedom comes responsibility and all that rot.</p></blockquote>
<p>Don&#8217;t care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Strong</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11230</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/#comment-11230</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s funny how they enlisted &quot;liberal,&quot; PBS-style design to the cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s funny how they enlisted &#8220;liberal,&#8221; PBS-style design to the cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11228</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 14:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/#comment-11228</guid>
		<description>This does nothing to inform or educate.  It serves only to inflame Rick Scarborough&#039;s fan base.  In other words business as usual for US politics.  I&#039;ll now return to my regularly scheduled, praying for a third party candidate from the center.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This does nothing to inform or educate.  It serves only to inflame Rick Scarborough&#8217;s fan base.  In other words business as usual for US politics.  I&#8217;ll now return to my regularly scheduled, praying for a third party candidate from the center.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicky</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11225</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 14:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/#comment-11225</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry I don&#039;t understand what we are to discuss. The picture in this posting gives no details why Rick Scarborough thinks liberalism kills kids. Based on the title of the picture, it sounds like he is trying to be provocative or just plain silly. I have no interest in either attitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry I don&#8217;t understand what we are to discuss. The picture in this posting gives no details why Rick Scarborough thinks liberalism kills kids. Based on the title of the picture, it sounds like he is trying to be provocative or just plain silly. I have no interest in either attitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian in MA</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11164</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian in MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 08:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/#comment-11164</guid>
		<description>By the way. For clarity&#039;s sake, I&#039;m talking about the new liberalism that has swept the country, not the classical liberalism of Adam Smith. You know, with freedom comes responsibility and all that rot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way. For clarity&#8217;s sake, I&#8217;m talking about the new liberalism that has swept the country, not the classical liberalism of Adam Smith. You know, with freedom comes responsibility and all that rot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian in MA</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11163</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian in MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 08:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/04/05/discuss-2/#comment-11163</guid>
		<description>1. Abortion, unless of course &quot;they don&#039;t count as kids despite the fact we refer to the person seeking an abortion as mother&quot;. Of course, that only accounts for about 1,370,000... but who is counting?

2. Statist Mentality - Society is responsible, not you. Therefore you have no need to be held accountable, that is Big Brother&#039;s job.

3. Numbing of public schools and pushing feminist agendas rather than educating to a level considered literate.

I&#039;d say generally speaking, that the statement is on the mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Abortion, unless of course &#8220;they don&#8217;t count as kids despite the fact we refer to the person seeking an abortion as mother&#8221;. Of course, that only accounts for about 1,370,000&#8230; but who is counting?</p>
<p>2. Statist Mentality &#8211; Society is responsible, not you. Therefore you have no need to be held accountable, that is Big Brother&#8217;s job.</p>
<p>3. Numbing of public schools and pushing feminist agendas rather than educating to a level considered literate.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say generally speaking, that the statement is on the mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
