<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cynthia McKinney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2006/04/07/cynthia-mckinney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/04/07/cynthia-mckinney/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Strong</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/04/07/cynthia-mckinney/comment-page-1/#comment-11796</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 23:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/04/07/cynthia-mckinney/#comment-11796</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;How long, by the way, until we see a South Park episode dedicated to the free-swinging Georgia Congresswoman?&lt;/i&gt;

At their current rate, about a week and a half.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>How long, by the way, until we see a South Park episode dedicated to the free-swinging Georgia Congresswoman?</i></p>
<p>At their current rate, about a week and a half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GN</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/04/07/cynthia-mckinney/comment-page-1/#comment-11780</link>
		<dc:creator>GN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 19:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/04/07/cynthia-mckinney/#comment-11780</guid>
		<description>Arrogance should be dealt with swiftly and assertively. She was out of line ... there was no evident racism here with the exception of C Macs&#039; s inference. 

Common courtesy and adherence to protocols of security are needed. And ... this deal got too much press .... it could have been handled in chambers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arrogance should be dealt with swiftly and assertively. She was out of line &#8230; there was no evident racism here with the exception of C Macs&#8217; s inference. </p>
<p>Common courtesy and adherence to protocols of security are needed. And &#8230; this deal got too much press &#8230;. it could have been handled in chambers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reader_iam</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/04/07/cynthia-mckinney/comment-page-1/#comment-11745</link>
		<dc:creator>reader_iam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 13:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/04/07/cynthia-mckinney/#comment-11745</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;We police our ranks, you police yours. WeÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢ll defend our creeps from your attacks, even if youÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢re right. If they need to be dressed down, weÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢ll do the down-dressing.&lt;/i&gt;

Interesting. The immediate parallel is how, these days, you&#039;re not supposed to correct or say anything to other people&#039;s children, even if they do something right in front of you when their parents aren&#039;t around.

This is in contrast to back in the day, when every adult saw it as his or her duty to police the unruly and disruptive. Generally, no hard feelings ensued; it was seen as a cooperative effort to maintain a certain order.

Shared standards in certain areas really aren&#039;t such a bad thing, when you think about it. More unifying, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>We police our ranks, you police yours. WeÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢ll defend our creeps from your attacks, even if youÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢re right. If they need to be dressed down, weÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢ll do the down-dressing.</i></p>
<p>Interesting. The immediate parallel is how, these days, you&#8217;re not supposed to correct or say anything to other people&#8217;s children, even if they do something right in front of you when their parents aren&#8217;t around.</p>
<p>This is in contrast to back in the day, when every adult saw it as his or her duty to police the unruly and disruptive. Generally, no hard feelings ensued; it was seen as a cooperative effort to maintain a certain order.</p>
<p>Shared standards in certain areas really aren&#8217;t such a bad thing, when you think about it. More unifying, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/04/07/cynthia-mckinney/comment-page-1/#comment-11669</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 05:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/04/07/cynthia-mckinney/#comment-11669</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a Democrat, but I believe she deserves to be grilled about this.  No judgment until proven guilty, but...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Democrat, but I believe she deserves to be grilled about this.  No judgment until proven guilty, but&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

