Straining The Spin.

By Michael Reynolds | Related entries in Foreign Policy, General Politics, The War On Terrorism

So much for the spin that Porter Goss left the CIA only because John Negreponte and the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board weren’t happy with his work. Newsweek via Raw Story has this:

CIA Executive Director Kyle ‘Dusty’ Foggo has resigned his post, according to an email sent out to the agency Monday morning, MSNBC reported Monday.

Foggo’s resignation was reported Monday on MSNBC. The email, which the network did not provide, allegedly stated that in light of CIA Director Porter Goss’s departure, Foggo is stepping down.

According to MSNBC, the e-mail stated that “new directors deserve the ability to bring in their own team,” and that Foggo expects to remain on the job for a few more weeks during the “transition.”

Excerpts from web exclusive article by Newsweek:

As NEWSWEEK first reported, the CIA’s inspector general has been investigating whether Foggo helped steer agency contracts to companies run by Brent Wilkes, a defense contractor who was identified as an unindicted co-conspirator when former San Diego congressman and ex-Navy air ace Randy (Duke) Cunningham pleaded guilty in a Congressional bribery scandal.

The case for there being a connection between Goss and Foggo and Cunningham and Watergate hookers, is now more compelling than the case for a connection between Saddam and Al Qaeda. That latter helped launch a war. Will this at least launch a Congressional investigation?


This entry was posted on Monday, May 8th, 2006 and is filed under Foreign Policy, General Politics, The War On Terrorism. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Responses to “Straining The Spin.”

  1. Callimachus Says:

    “Watergate hookers.” This is better than fiction. What’s next? Firetrucks? Dancing bears?

  2. michael reynolds Says:

    I don’t care if it’s Dems or Reps, the phrase “Watergate hookers” brings a smile to the face of ny real political junkie.

  3. GN Says:

    Watergate Hookers – Yeah …. Will this at least launch an investigation? – not with the current Congressional makeup.

  4. reader_iam Says:

    I. Hate. Second-Term. Presidencies. All. Of. Them.

    (The merits of any and all investigations, scandals, etc. etc. over the course of my lifetime aside.)

    [/immature, foot-stamping little tantrum]

  5. JP Says:

    “Congressional investigation?” Only if the Republicans don’t keep the House in November.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: