Peak Oil
By Callimachus | Related entries in Corporate Business, Science, TechnologyPrometheus: The Science Policy Weblog is an excellent site.
Here they delve into the Peak Oil question. According to their sniffers, the peak moment is coming, and soon, and that’s the consensus of people in the oil biz.
But, since this is a policy-based site, they’re interested in how Big Oil will “frame the issue to a public more concerned about $3.159/10 gas than anything else.”
Much like the climate change debate, on Peak Oil you have two sides with staunchly staked-out positions. Each side includes their own petroleum geologists, resource economists, energy investment bankers and multinational oil companies. Of course it is the latter we’ll listen to most closely, since they ostensibly are in the best position to know about a peak and perhaps to drive policy toward or away from it.
So what are the majors saying and doing about Peak Oil? Chevron is clearly embracing the tactic of warning the public so that when the public eventually sees the light, Chevron can say, “Hey, we’ve been telling you about this for a while!”
But not so ExxonMobil. XOM is taking exactly the opposite tactic: “With abundant oil resources still available … peak production is nowhere in sight.”
This difference in opinion has interesting parallels to how these two companies have approached other environmental issues over the past few years. Chevron has been running ad campaigns touting their environmental stewardship while Exxon has been pouring money into muddying the climate change science waters. Further, many assume that XOM is well-aware of climate change risk, but has their own internal logic and reasons to muddy the debate. If so, it parallels their attitudes on Peak Oil, for while they are running NY Times op-ed ads saying “peak production is nowhere in sight,” they apparently don’t really believe that themselves.
Thankfully, although positions are staked out on Peak Oil, there does not seem to be a Left/Right, Republican/Democrat slant on the positions, which may make political action easier if/when this issue’s time has come. And that might be the best indication that this isn’t a clear “winners and losers” issue. If the Peakists are right, we’re all losers.
Sounds like a call to action to centrist/moderate types. An issue that hasn’t been ripped into polarities by the partisan juggernauts. Rally, rally!
This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 9th, 2006 and is filed under Corporate Business, Science, Technology. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
May 10th, 2006 at 9:02 pm
Carter proposed in 1979 that we invest in solar so that 20% of our energy would come from solar by 2000. Had we gone down that road, we’d be in much better shape now.
Perhaps the biggest lesson of this second oil crisis is to not ignore the signs the second time?