<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compassionate Conservatism&#8217;s Last True Believer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2006/06/16/compassionate-conservatisms-last-true-believer-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/06/16/compassionate-conservatisms-last-true-believer-2/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:53:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian in MA</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/06/16/compassionate-conservatisms-last-true-believer-2/comment-page-1/#comment-36525</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian in MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/06/16/compassionate-conservatisms-last-true-believer-2/#comment-36525</guid>
		<description>McCain&#039;s idea of conservatism appears to be &quot;no borders, no language, no culture&quot;, meaning he is not conservative at all. I&#039;ve heard that he is pro-life, but the way he sold this country out to immigration and can&#039;t seem to identify the menace of activist judges already plaguing us, I&#039;m wondering how sincere his convictions are. His only strong point with me right now is that he won&#039;t sell us out on Iraq given his family history and his statements. However, I&#039;m hoping no Republican would do that and am thus looking for a decent alternative. Forced to choose between him and some super left-wing nut, I&#039;ll take McCain.

Also, having a Clinton Aide talk about conservatism, Bush, or Rove is laughable. I&#039;m surprised Reed didn&#039;t state the Republicans were responsible for generating hurricane Katrina.

But lets quote him shall we:

&quot;But Gerson&#039;s flourishes turned out to be just grace notes in an otherwise conventional composition. Far from a brave new doctrine, Bushism became merely the second coming of ReaganismÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬?tax cuts for the wealthy, photo ops for the poor, favors for narrow interests, and deficits for the rest of us.&quot;

Now here&#039;s a man you can trust to know anything about conservatism, a former Clinton aide, a left-wing Slate writer, and a dyed in the wool liberal who hasn&#039;t studied economics but probably has a degree in it. I&#039;ll hold my breath waiting for a shred of truth to come from this guy regarding this topic. We&#039;d be better off asking Saddam what Democracy is like now that we&#039;ve captured him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain&#8217;s idea of conservatism appears to be &#8220;no borders, no language, no culture&#8221;, meaning he is not conservative at all. I&#8217;ve heard that he is pro-life, but the way he sold this country out to immigration and can&#8217;t seem to identify the menace of activist judges already plaguing us, I&#8217;m wondering how sincere his convictions are. His only strong point with me right now is that he won&#8217;t sell us out on Iraq given his family history and his statements. However, I&#8217;m hoping no Republican would do that and am thus looking for a decent alternative. Forced to choose between him and some super left-wing nut, I&#8217;ll take McCain.</p>
<p>Also, having a Clinton Aide talk about conservatism, Bush, or Rove is laughable. I&#8217;m surprised Reed didn&#8217;t state the Republicans were responsible for generating hurricane Katrina.</p>
<p>But lets quote him shall we:</p>
<p>&#8220;But Gerson&#8217;s flourishes turned out to be just grace notes in an otherwise conventional composition. Far from a brave new doctrine, Bushism became merely the second coming of ReaganismÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬?tax cuts for the wealthy, photo ops for the poor, favors for narrow interests, and deficits for the rest of us.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now here&#8217;s a man you can trust to know anything about conservatism, a former Clinton aide, a left-wing Slate writer, and a dyed in the wool liberal who hasn&#8217;t studied economics but probably has a degree in it. I&#8217;ll hold my breath waiting for a shred of truth to come from this guy regarding this topic. We&#8217;d be better off asking Saddam what Democracy is like now that we&#8217;ve captured him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
