Billions Go To “Farmers” Who Don’t Farm

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Money, Social Programs

The title says it all.

Key sentence:

The payments now account for nearly half of the nation’s expanding agricultural subsidy system, a complex web that has little basis in fairness or efficiency.

From the Washington Post.

This entry was posted on Sunday, July 2nd, 2006 and is filed under Money, Social Programs. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Billions Go To “Farmers” Who Don’t Farm”

  1. Bob Aman Says:

    I’ve been wondering for ages why those billions aren’t going entirely towards mandating that the “leftover” farmers produce crops suitable for use in alternative fuel sources.

  2. wj Says:

    No more mysterious than the fact that most of the money “for the preservation of the family farms” goes to corporate farms (in addition to these non-farms). Subsidies may (well sometimes) start as an effort to do something worthwhile; but they end up being ends in themselves.

  3. Paul Brinkley Says:

    I would guess that there’s one legitimate argument for this: the government spends less money to keep those fields unused than the economy would suffer in damage if those fields were to produce enough food to drive down worldwide food prices to the point that many farms would simply go bankrupt - including some family farms.

    In any case, my understanding is that this has been going on for decades. It’s not exactly news, though it is worth reporting on every so often.

  4. wj Says:

    Except, of course, that if the government was not spending money to hold up prices in the US, prices worldwide would go UP — because people in poor countries would not have to compete with subsidized American farmers. If the world were on the brink of famine due to insufficient agricultural capacity, then you would have a point (albeit a different one) about negative imacts of American subsidies going away.

    But at the moment, the main impact would be improved living standards around the world — and at a far lower cost than what we spend on foreign aid trying to improve things. And if the EU and Japan also dropped their farm subsidies at the same time, the global economy would really zoom! In fact, that’s what the Doha Round of trade talks is trying for; and were it is hung up.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: