<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One worry addressed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2006/07/12/one-worry-addressed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/07/12/one-worry-addressed/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meredith</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/07/12/one-worry-addressed/comment-page-1/#comment-50471</link>
		<dc:creator>Meredith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/07/12/one-worry-addressed/#comment-50471</guid>
		<description>Well Lonely, I can see why it would be annoying to have to follow all their wishes about whether or not a woman could interrogate them, whether that woman is properly covered etc.  There should be some limit on how much can be objected to.

But, as I said before, aside from purely logistical issues, what does &quot;humiliating and degrading treatment&quot; get us?  Aside from the fact that it might be fun for the guards to tease and make fun of the detainees, it&#039;s not like these people are going to spill their guts due to too much teasing.  Panties on the head and naked pyramids are not going to lead to useful information.  In fact, if I were the one being humiliated like that, I would purposely give bad information to jack with the government&#039;s intelligence. 

All humiliating and degrading treatment towards the detainees does is make other countries hate us more, and it makes us look like a-holes.  Not to mention the fact that we&#039;re setting an environment where people who might have useful information aren&#039;t going to want to come forward with it.  If I had information, I would be afraid they would toss me in a cell in Gitmo, and I would probably be lucky not to be beaten and raped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Lonely, I can see why it would be annoying to have to follow all their wishes about whether or not a woman could interrogate them, whether that woman is properly covered etc.  There should be some limit on how much can be objected to.</p>
<p>But, as I said before, aside from purely logistical issues, what does &#8220;humiliating and degrading treatment&#8221; get us?  Aside from the fact that it might be fun for the guards to tease and make fun of the detainees, it&#8217;s not like these people are going to spill their guts due to too much teasing.  Panties on the head and naked pyramids are not going to lead to useful information.  In fact, if I were the one being humiliated like that, I would purposely give bad information to jack with the government&#8217;s intelligence. </p>
<p>All humiliating and degrading treatment towards the detainees does is make other countries hate us more, and it makes us look like a-holes.  Not to mention the fact that we&#8217;re setting an environment where people who might have useful information aren&#8217;t going to want to come forward with it.  If I had information, I would be afraid they would toss me in a cell in Gitmo, and I would probably be lucky not to be beaten and raped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lonely Federalist</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/07/12/one-worry-addressed/comment-page-1/#comment-50386</link>
		<dc:creator>Lonely Federalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/07/12/one-worry-addressed/#comment-50386</guid>
		<description>This part that bothers me:

&lt;blockquote&gt; * outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Who gets to decide that?  Who sets the standards of &quot;personal dignity&quot; here?  Does having women in their presence qualify?  And Allah forbid one of them be questioned by a woman, or be subject to her orders!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This part that bothers me:</p>
<blockquote><p> * outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment;</p></blockquote>
<p>Who gets to decide that?  Who sets the standards of &#8220;personal dignity&#8221; here?  Does having women in their presence qualify?  And Allah forbid one of them be questioned by a woman, or be subject to her orders!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernie</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/07/12/one-worry-addressed/comment-page-1/#comment-50367</link>
		<dc:creator>bernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/07/12/one-worry-addressed/#comment-50367</guid>
		<description>What happens if Hezbollah bombs another US target (remember Beruit)?  Would the terrorists be considered illegal combatants or POW&#039;s?  Would the bombers deserve full protections of the Geneva Conventions or just common article 3?  Who makes that decision?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens if Hezbollah bombs another US target (remember Beruit)?  Would the terrorists be considered illegal combatants or POW&#8217;s?  Would the bombers deserve full protections of the Geneva Conventions or just common article 3?  Who makes that decision?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

