<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maddox On 9/11 Conspiracies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2006/08/07/maddox-on-911-conspiracies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/08/07/maddox-on-911-conspiracies/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unknown</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/08/07/maddox-on-911-conspiracies/comment-page-1/#comment-73326</link>
		<dc:creator>Unknown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 08:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/08/07/maddox-on-911-conspiracies/#comment-73326</guid>
		<description>To be fair, he only criticises the one loose change film, which despite having inconsistencies, does show a lot of incriminating evidence.  He also uses childish insults about Dylan&#039;s appearence and the fact that he is young, in order to try and emphasise his points.  Other films not mentioned, which he intended to dismiss with his article include &#039;Martial law / 911&#039; and &#039;Terrorstorm&#039; by the increasingly popular Alex Jones.
Also, Maddox links to Popular Mechanics, without actually explaining it himself, as a way of cementing his article.  However, if he had done his research, he would have realised that this article has been heavily criticised itself. See http://play.rbn.com/?url=demnow/demnow/demand/2006/sept/video/dnB20060911a.rm&amp;proto=rtsp&amp;start . 
So basically he doesnt &#039;tear apart&#039; conspiracy theorys.  He just spits at one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, he only criticises the one loose change film, which despite having inconsistencies, does show a lot of incriminating evidence.  He also uses childish insults about Dylan&#8217;s appearence and the fact that he is young, in order to try and emphasise his points.  Other films not mentioned, which he intended to dismiss with his article include &#8216;Martial law / 911&#8242; and &#8216;Terrorstorm&#8217; by the increasingly popular Alex Jones.<br />
Also, Maddox links to Popular Mechanics, without actually explaining it himself, as a way of cementing his article.  However, if he had done his research, he would have realised that this article has been heavily criticised itself. See <a href="http://play.rbn.com/?url=demnow/demnow/demand/2006/sept/video/dnB20060911a.rm&#038;proto=rtsp&#038;start" >http://play.rbn.com/?url=demnow/demnow/demand/2006/sept/video/dnB20060911a.rm&#038;proto=rtsp&#038;start</a> .<br />
So basically he doesnt &#8216;tear apart&#8217; conspiracy theorys.  He just spits at one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DosPeros</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/08/07/maddox-on-911-conspiracies/comment-page-1/#comment-59169</link>
		<dc:creator>DosPeros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/08/07/maddox-on-911-conspiracies/#comment-59169</guid>
		<description>Thanks Justin for that link.  That guy is funny.  I direct all to &quot;How to Spot a Pedophile.&quot; He is obviously a very serious scientist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Justin for that link.  That guy is funny.  I direct all to &#8220;How to Spot a Pedophile.&#8221; He is obviously a very serious scientist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

