<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The White House Endorses Ned Lamont?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2006/08/15/the-white-houses-endorsement-of-ned-lamont/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/08/15/the-white-houses-endorsement-of-ned-lamont/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Joe Lieberman&#8217;s Tricky Tightrope</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/08/15/the-white-houses-endorsement-of-ned-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-64541</link>
		<dc:creator>Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Joe Lieberman&#8217;s Tricky Tightrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 17:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=2526#comment-64541</guid>
		<description>[...] Again, I said so before in the post &#8220;The White House Endorses Ned Lamont&#8221;, I find the Republican&#8217;s backing of Lieberman to be completely disingenuous. You and I both know that if Lieberman had won the primary, Republicans would be showing no love for Lieberman. But given this opportunity, they see a chance to hand Ned Lamont a win and paint the Democrats weak on defense. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Again, I said so before in the post &#8220;The White House Endorses Ned Lamont&#8221;, I find the Republican&#8217;s backing of Lieberman to be completely disingenuous. You and I both know that if Lieberman had won the primary, Republicans would be showing no love for Lieberman. But given this opportunity, they see a chance to hand Ned Lamont a win and paint the Democrats weak on defense. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/08/15/the-white-houses-endorsement-of-ned-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-62586</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 19:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=2526#comment-62586</guid>
		<description>AS FRED SANFORD (REDD FOXX) USED TO CALL OUT TO LAMONT ....... HELLO DUMMY!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AS FRED SANFORD (REDD FOXX) USED TO CALL OUT TO LAMONT &#8230;&#8230;. HELLO DUMMY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eural</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/08/15/the-white-houses-endorsement-of-ned-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-61869</link>
		<dc:creator>Eural</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=2526#comment-61869</guid>
		<description>Oh, come on - now I&#039;m intrigued probligo. What is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, come on &#8211; now I&#8217;m intrigued probligo. What is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/08/15/the-white-houses-endorsement-of-ned-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-61798</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 04:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=2526#comment-61798</guid>
		<description>Heh...okay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh&#8230;okay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: probligo</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/08/15/the-white-houses-endorsement-of-ned-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-61796</link>
		<dc:creator>probligo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 04:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=2526#comment-61796</guid>
		<description>There is a third alternative,  but I won&#039;t put it forward...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a third alternative,  but I won&#8217;t put it forward&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

