<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iraq Blame Game Points At Ideology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-75601</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/#comment-75601</guid>
		<description>Remember, the guy who hired all these people asked interviewees about Roe v. Wade. So I didn&#039;t mix religion and politics here, they did. And since there&#039;s obviously a religious/ideological aspect to this situation, I find it interesting that while a true Christian viewpoint on health care would be to give the most people the most health care, it&#039;s the Capitalist&#039;s viewpoint to privatize the industry and make people pay for it. What won out here? Well, capitalism.

Frankly, I don&#039;t know if Mr. Haveman is a Christian or not, but because the guy who hired him obviously is making people pass some sort of Roe v. Wade/ideology test, I find it ironic and sad that we&#039;d take the free health care away from the Iraqis after we just bombed their country to kingdom come. It belies a certain, sad, common-sense blindness that seems to be the pervasive in the Republican Right these days. I hope moderate Republicans take over soon, because we&#039;re truly seeing the head-shaking effects of religio-political mindset at work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, the guy who hired all these people asked interviewees about Roe v. Wade. So I didn&#8217;t mix religion and politics here, they did. And since there&#8217;s obviously a religious/ideological aspect to this situation, I find it interesting that while a true Christian viewpoint on health care would be to give the most people the most health care, it&#8217;s the Capitalist&#8217;s viewpoint to privatize the industry and make people pay for it. What won out here? Well, capitalism.</p>
<p>Frankly, I don&#8217;t know if Mr. Haveman is a Christian or not, but because the guy who hired him obviously is making people pass some sort of Roe v. Wade/ideology test, I find it ironic and sad that we&#8217;d take the free health care away from the Iraqis after we just bombed their country to kingdom come. It belies a certain, sad, common-sense blindness that seems to be the pervasive in the Republican Right these days. I hope moderate Republicans take over soon, because we&#8217;re truly seeing the head-shaking effects of religio-political mindset at work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustAnotherIdjut</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-75600</link>
		<dc:creator>JustAnotherIdjut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/#comment-75600</guid>
		<description>ES,

Point taken.   Two different points in time.   I tend to drift off during the longer posts.

&quot;...private contractors and their money grubbing ways&quot;

heh - that&#039;s why he signed on with Black water.   The money is &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; good.    GOD,  I love Capitalism!

&quot;...long days and long nights, US Army typical BS, lack of resources and support...&quot;

and that&#039;s why he left the Army.

I judge from your post that you were in the Army there.
If so,  thank you for your service!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ES,</p>
<p>Point taken.   Two different points in time.   I tend to drift off during the longer posts.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;private contractors and their money grubbing ways&#8221;</p>
<p>heh &#8211; that&#8217;s why he signed on with Black water.   The money is <i>very</i> good.    GOD,  I love Capitalism!</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;long days and long nights, US Army typical BS, lack of resources and support&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>and that&#8217;s why he left the Army.</p>
<p>I judge from your post that you were in the Army there.<br />
If so,  thank you for your service!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrianOfAtlanta</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-75592</link>
		<dc:creator>BrianOfAtlanta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/#comment-75592</guid>
		<description>&quot;Apparently, being a good Christian means being a good CapitalistÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦&quot;

Where did this come from? The article had many good points, but I don&#039;t think there is anything in it to suggest that Mr. Haveman&#039;s questionable ideas had anything to do with him being a Christian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Apparently, being a good Christian means being a good CapitalistÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦&#8221;</p>
<p>Where did this come from? The article had many good points, but I don&#8217;t think there is anything in it to suggest that Mr. Haveman&#8217;s questionable ideas had anything to do with him being a Christian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ES</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-75574</link>
		<dc:creator>ES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/#comment-75574</guid>
		<description>The question, &quot;How do these people get past this OÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢Beirne guy?&quot; can be answered by saying the gate keeping was being done in the opening parts of the build-up in CPA.  Though I do not know, and that is the caveat, I would suspect the gate keepers are long-gone.  The environment that day is probably not going to be the same as it was back then - early deployments are like the Wild West: very little oversight and rules by the garrison.

The period of time spoken of is right after the administration, the neo-conservatives, and the water-carrying pundits felt vindicated by their moves into Iraq.  Andrew Jackson had &quot;To the victor goes the spoils.&quot;  Iraq was the spoils for their support of the administration and the deeds in which the regime replacement was done.  I would also suspect whoever is running the staff over there is going to be a little more selective on who is to be hired - the Wild West days should be over.

You had asked, &quot;Should I believe my relative or the WP?&quot;  Again, the Post article is about the early days in the CPA.  It sounds as if your relative is a recent addition to the staff over there.  Different periods of time. 

Just to show a sign of the times, when I had gotten to my duty station, we used to drive on Irish with two unarmored vehicles with a driver and a shooter in each vehicle.  Six months later, we were ordered to get in a military convoy with lots of vehicles and guns or to use a privatized security firm one of our sister units had a contract with.  If a newspaper writer were to write a story of those earlier days does not mean the same stimuli and events are there today.  

While I was there, I bad-mouthed: Halliburton, ALL privatized security firms (I disagree with the Roman model the US has gone with getting people with guns to do the job over there), private contractors and their money grubbing ways, CPA employees (on a continual basis, especially those yahoos who were bottlenecks in getting the job done), the food, the Saddam Revenge, long days and long nights, US Army typical BS, lack of resources and support, and so forth.  What does that say about me?  I am not being confrontational about this - I complained about a myriad of things while I was there.  Some of it I think are legitimate gripes, and some were because of my discomfort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question, &#8220;How do these people get past this OÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢Beirne guy?&#8221; can be answered by saying the gate keeping was being done in the opening parts of the build-up in CPA.  Though I do not know, and that is the caveat, I would suspect the gate keepers are long-gone.  The environment that day is probably not going to be the same as it was back then &#8211; early deployments are like the Wild West: very little oversight and rules by the garrison.</p>
<p>The period of time spoken of is right after the administration, the neo-conservatives, and the water-carrying pundits felt vindicated by their moves into Iraq.  Andrew Jackson had &#8220;To the victor goes the spoils.&#8221;  Iraq was the spoils for their support of the administration and the deeds in which the regime replacement was done.  I would also suspect whoever is running the staff over there is going to be a little more selective on who is to be hired &#8211; the Wild West days should be over.</p>
<p>You had asked, &#8220;Should I believe my relative or the WP?&#8221;  Again, the Post article is about the early days in the CPA.  It sounds as if your relative is a recent addition to the staff over there.  Different periods of time. </p>
<p>Just to show a sign of the times, when I had gotten to my duty station, we used to drive on Irish with two unarmored vehicles with a driver and a shooter in each vehicle.  Six months later, we were ordered to get in a military convoy with lots of vehicles and guns or to use a privatized security firm one of our sister units had a contract with.  If a newspaper writer were to write a story of those earlier days does not mean the same stimuli and events are there today.  </p>
<p>While I was there, I bad-mouthed: Halliburton, ALL privatized security firms (I disagree with the Roman model the US has gone with getting people with guns to do the job over there), private contractors and their money grubbing ways, CPA employees (on a continual basis, especially those yahoos who were bottlenecks in getting the job done), the food, the Saddam Revenge, long days and long nights, US Army typical BS, lack of resources and support, and so forth.  What does that say about me?  I am not being confrontational about this &#8211; I complained about a myriad of things while I was there.  Some of it I think are legitimate gripes, and some were because of my discomfort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustAnotherIdjut</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-75569</link>
		<dc:creator>JustAnotherIdjut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/#comment-75569</guid>
		<description>I know this is only anecdotal evidence, but...

I have relative who served as an Army Ranger in both
Afghanistan and Iraq.   When his 6 years was up,  he got out and
signed on with BlackWater.   He provides security for visiting State
department employees.  He says 90% of them spend their time
mouthing off about Bush,  the war,  and Blackwater or Haliburton.
They all try to get a short stint in Iraq just to build their resumes.

My question is:  How do these people get past this O&#039;Beirne guy?

Should I believe my relative or the WP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is only anecdotal evidence, but&#8230;</p>
<p>I have relative who served as an Army Ranger in both<br />
Afghanistan and Iraq.   When his 6 years was up,  he got out and<br />
signed on with BlackWater.   He provides security for visiting State<br />
department employees.  He says 90% of them spend their time<br />
mouthing off about Bush,  the war,  and Blackwater or Haliburton.<br />
They all try to get a short stint in Iraq just to build their resumes.</p>
<p>My question is:  How do these people get past this O&#8217;Beirne guy?</p>
<p>Should I believe my relative or the WP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ME</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-75546</link>
		<dc:creator>ME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/#comment-75546</guid>
		<description>First we had Katrina

That made us look around...and we realized

We now have a Katrina war on terror
We have a Katrina Iraq reconstruction
We have a Katrina education system
We have a Katrina deficit
We have a Katrina health care system
We have a Katrina army

Everything they touch turns to Katrina!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First we had Katrina</p>
<p>That made us look around&#8230;and we realized</p>
<p>We now have a Katrina war on terror<br />
We have a Katrina Iraq reconstruction<br />
We have a Katrina education system<br />
We have a Katrina deficit<br />
We have a Katrina health care system<br />
We have a Katrina army</p>
<p>Everything they touch turns to Katrina!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ES</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-75543</link>
		<dc:creator>ES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/#comment-75543</guid>
		<description>I was there in the CPA area with the military.  The CPA senior advisors I was aware of and had interactions with were competent and serviceable; some were even outstanding.  Some of the senior advisor&#039;s staff had folks with knowledge and drive (minus one and he was a first grade jack-hole and lout).  The problem I had seen was at the lower levels where the young&#039;uns worked.  Some of these folks were intelligent themselves but they lacked a couple of things: they could not work in a bureaucracy (not only US military, US Government, but also what the Iraqis had themselves), they seemed to shot for the &#039;pie-in-the-sky&#039; solution even though the realities of the situation dictated a different solution, and they at times were colossal pains in the *** when they controlled the purse strings to get projects out to be constructed (tied the other two points).  

The guys came over with the State Department&#039;s exception to be given these appointments while their salaries were GS-15 and SES positions.  The GS-15 civilian rate is equivalent to an O-6 in the military and a fair number of political hacks with no business knowledge were able to pull up to $140,000 for four months of work after regular pay, overtime, hazard and post differential pays, and probably a bonus at the end.  So people were padding their resumes, pulling in some big bucks for a short period of time, making decisions that a number of them SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN MAKING, and HIDING either in Palace or the LSA trailer parks - what exactly did we get?

About three or four weeks ago, an appeals court overturned a decision to have Custer Battles (CB) to repay $10M to the US Government for a variety of over-charging and other wrong doings.  CB is a private security firm over in Iraq.  The appeals court said even though the monies paying the Contractors by the CPA were from the American folks, the way the Contracting Office was set up by these yahoos caused office to be a non-entity even though both parties signed contracts.  The Contracting Office had a very big part in the reconstruction part and it was flawed by enabling various Contractors to walk away and over-charge on the contracts with no means of retribution for wrongdoing.  We might as well as have given the Contractors a blank check and tell us what we needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was there in the CPA area with the military.  The CPA senior advisors I was aware of and had interactions with were competent and serviceable; some were even outstanding.  Some of the senior advisor&#8217;s staff had folks with knowledge and drive (minus one and he was a first grade jack-hole and lout).  The problem I had seen was at the lower levels where the young&#8217;uns worked.  Some of these folks were intelligent themselves but they lacked a couple of things: they could not work in a bureaucracy (not only US military, US Government, but also what the Iraqis had themselves), they seemed to shot for the &#8216;pie-in-the-sky&#8217; solution even though the realities of the situation dictated a different solution, and they at times were colossal pains in the *** when they controlled the purse strings to get projects out to be constructed (tied the other two points).  </p>
<p>The guys came over with the State Department&#8217;s exception to be given these appointments while their salaries were GS-15 and SES positions.  The GS-15 civilian rate is equivalent to an O-6 in the military and a fair number of political hacks with no business knowledge were able to pull up to $140,000 for four months of work after regular pay, overtime, hazard and post differential pays, and probably a bonus at the end.  So people were padding their resumes, pulling in some big bucks for a short period of time, making decisions that a number of them SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN MAKING, and HIDING either in Palace or the LSA trailer parks &#8211; what exactly did we get?</p>
<p>About three or four weeks ago, an appeals court overturned a decision to have Custer Battles (CB) to repay $10M to the US Government for a variety of over-charging and other wrong doings.  CB is a private security firm over in Iraq.  The appeals court said even though the monies paying the Contractors by the CPA were from the American folks, the way the Contracting Office was set up by these yahoos caused office to be a non-entity even though both parties signed contracts.  The Contracting Office had a very big part in the reconstruction part and it was flawed by enabling various Contractors to walk away and over-charge on the contracts with no means of retribution for wrongdoing.  We might as well as have given the Contractors a blank check and tell us what we needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eural</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-75536</link>
		<dc:creator>Eural</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/#comment-75536</guid>
		<description>As I&#039;ve posted elsewhere this is horrible but changes little domestically - all of my conservative friends still chant &quot;but the Dems would be worse&quot; because thats how they defend the Bush fiasco now. Whatever the evidence, whatever the lie, whatever the incompetence...at least the Dems aren&#039;t in charge to screw it up more. 

You cannot reason - or change - someone with that outlook. I know, I&#039;ve been trying for 3 years now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I&#8217;ve posted elsewhere this is horrible but changes little domestically &#8211; all of my conservative friends still chant &#8220;but the Dems would be worse&#8221; because thats how they defend the Bush fiasco now. Whatever the evidence, whatever the lie, whatever the incompetence&#8230;at least the Dems aren&#8217;t in charge to screw it up more. </p>
<p>You cannot reason &#8211; or change &#8211; someone with that outlook. I know, I&#8217;ve been trying for 3 years now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-75517</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/09/18/iraq-blame-game-points-at-ideology/#comment-75517</guid>
		<description>And the kicker? It just proves their supporters&#039; theory that government is fundamentally incompetent and should be made small enough to drown in the bathtub. Win, win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the kicker? It just proves their supporters&#8217; theory that government is fundamentally incompetent and should be made small enough to drown in the bathtub. Win, win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

