<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging lawsuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cranky critter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/comment-page-1/#comment-721618</link>
		<dc:creator>cranky critter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 19:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-721618</guid>
		<description>I can easily imagine Clarey prevailing, given that by these accounts he can demonstrate clear harm to his personal life.

If you&#039;re going to parody someone, what&#039;s the big fricken deal about including an &quot;about this blog&quot; that says &quot;no, not really&quot; or something like that. You don&#039;t have a right to misrepresent someone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can easily imagine Clarey prevailing, given that by these accounts he can demonstrate clear harm to his personal life.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going to parody someone, what&#8217;s the big fricken deal about including an &#8220;about this blog&#8221; that says &#8220;no, not really&#8221; or something like that. You don&#8217;t have a right to misrepresent someone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Lee</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/comment-page-1/#comment-721606</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 03:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-721606</guid>
		<description>Krishnaswamy spent years trolling Clarey&#039;s blog under dozens of pseudonyms. At first, Claret welcomed the difference of opinion but Krishnawamy became obsessed. Considering how long he took to get his PHD from Berkeley, I imagine Krishnaswamy was doing more blog commenting and blog impersonation than graduate research.

Krishnaswamy is a race-baiter. There is nothing on Clarey&#039;s blog that is racist per se. Many of his followers are black. Similar sentiments can be found on Another Black Conservative. Krishnaswamy as a hypersensitive liberal Indian thinks he has exclusive rights to the definition of &quot;racist.&quot;

His initial impersonation violated Google&#039;s terms of service. That was the reason he changed the anti-blog. Clarey is hardly a well known economist and radio personality in all but the loosest terms. Speaking on a radio station a few times doesn&#039;t open up someone to defamation.

California, where Krishnaswamey lived is more protective of speech than other states. He got away from legal responsibility, but he&#039;s an absolute nutter to spend most of his spare time trolling obscure blogs and making a personal mission out of attacking someone whose views are far from racist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Krishnaswamy spent years trolling Clarey&#8217;s blog under dozens of pseudonyms. At first, Claret welcomed the difference of opinion but Krishnawamy became obsessed. Considering how long he took to get his PHD from Berkeley, I imagine Krishnaswamy was doing more blog commenting and blog impersonation than graduate research.</p>
<p>Krishnaswamy is a race-baiter. There is nothing on Clarey&#8217;s blog that is racist per se. Many of his followers are black. Similar sentiments can be found on Another Black Conservative. Krishnaswamy as a hypersensitive liberal Indian thinks he has exclusive rights to the definition of &#8220;racist.&#8221;</p>
<p>His initial impersonation violated Google&#8217;s terms of service. That was the reason he changed the anti-blog. Clarey is hardly a well known economist and radio personality in all but the loosest terms. Speaking on a radio station a few times doesn&#8217;t open up someone to defamation.</p>
<p>California, where Krishnaswamey lived is more protective of speech than other states. He got away from legal responsibility, but he&#8217;s an absolute nutter to spend most of his spare time trolling obscure blogs and making a personal mission out of attacking someone whose views are far from racist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 &#187; Blog Archives &#187; SOASTA Founder Talks SOA And Services</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/comment-page-1/#comment-90748</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 &#187; Blog Archives &#187; SOASTA Founder Talks SOA And Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-90748</guid>
		<description>[...] Donklephant&#160;- Oct 5, 2006&#8230; on Thursday, October 5th, 2006 and is filed under General, Blogging, Satire, Media, Law. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. &#8230; Continue [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Donklephant&nbsp;- Oct 5, 2006&#8230; on Thursday, October 5th, 2006 and is filed under General, Blogging, Satire, Media, Law. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. &#8230; Continue [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanjay Fan</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/comment-page-1/#comment-88261</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjay Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 03:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-88261</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get it... what is Clarey suing for?  Seems like Sanjay is just ragging on the guy for the whacked things that he said.  As for the impersonation thing, he stopped doing the impersonation, so Clarey just wants monetary damages now?

Also, why did Clarey remove all the things that Sanjay is criticizing?  Seems to me that Clarey got called on his offensive comments and now he is doing clean up.  As if that will get his credibility back.  Yeah, I live in MN and I have heard the guy on 1500.  Now that he has deleted and cleaned up his blog it seems like he is scared - I don&#039;t know what to think of him.  Frankly, this makes him look like an @$$.

Also, how is he getting around MN Stat 543.19 subd 1(a)(3)?  Basically it says that MN will not exercise personal jurisdiction over out of state tort defendants when the cause of action lies in defamation or privacy.  The attorneys are going to have to get the courts to ignore the legislature.  Good luck with that!  I also do not understand the whole state court thing...  I suppose the amount in controvery is not high enough.

This one will be fun to watch.  I cannot imagine that Clarey prevails...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it&#8230; what is Clarey suing for?  Seems like Sanjay is just ragging on the guy for the whacked things that he said.  As for the impersonation thing, he stopped doing the impersonation, so Clarey just wants monetary damages now?</p>
<p>Also, why did Clarey remove all the things that Sanjay is criticizing?  Seems to me that Clarey got called on his offensive comments and now he is doing clean up.  As if that will get his credibility back.  Yeah, I live in MN and I have heard the guy on 1500.  Now that he has deleted and cleaned up his blog it seems like he is scared &#8211; I don&#8217;t know what to think of him.  Frankly, this makes him look like an @$$.</p>
<p>Also, how is he getting around MN Stat 543.19 subd 1(a)(3)?  Basically it says that MN will not exercise personal jurisdiction over out of state tort defendants when the cause of action lies in defamation or privacy.  The attorneys are going to have to get the courts to ignore the legislature.  Good luck with that!  I also do not understand the whole state court thing&#8230;  I suppose the amount in controvery is not high enough.</p>
<p>This one will be fun to watch.  I cannot imagine that Clarey prevails&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entelliblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Verio Adds Free Blogging and Photo Gallery Tools</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/comment-page-1/#comment-86640</link>
		<dc:creator>Entelliblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Verio Adds Free Blogging and Photo Gallery Tools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 01:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-86640</guid>
		<description>[...] Blogging lawsuitDonklephant&#160;- Oct 5, 2006&#8230; Most likely, thanks to his prominence as an economist and radio host. But let s look past him. Is blogging alone enough to make someone a public figure? &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blogging lawsuitDonklephant&nbsp;- Oct 5, 2006&#8230; Most likely, thanks to his prominence as an economist and radio host. But let s look past him. Is blogging alone enough to make someone a public figure? &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Capitalism</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/comment-page-1/#comment-82315</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Capitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 00:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-82315</guid>
		<description>Hi Guys,

Just wanted to calm any fears that the law suit is about quelching the freedom of speech.  The impersonation web site in its previous form was certainly an impersonation, face, name, e-mail everything.  In its current form it&#039;s debateable if its defamitory, though people have the right to lay whatever criticism they want.

Regardless, wanted to make sure that people knew the intention is not to somehow limit the freedom of speech.

Additionally, I&#039;m betting nuts to bolts &quot;Blog Watcher&quot; is Sanjay himself.

Enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Guys,</p>
<p>Just wanted to calm any fears that the law suit is about quelching the freedom of speech.  The impersonation web site in its previous form was certainly an impersonation, face, name, e-mail everything.  In its current form it&#8217;s debateable if its defamitory, though people have the right to lay whatever criticism they want.</p>
<p>Regardless, wanted to make sure that people knew the intention is not to somehow limit the freedom of speech.</p>
<p>Additionally, I&#8217;m betting nuts to bolts &#8220;Blog Watcher&#8221; is Sanjay himself.</p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog watcher</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/comment-page-1/#comment-81938</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 21:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-81938</guid>
		<description>As, I suppose, do Clarey&#039;s own ample comments there; in fact he appears to have been the first commenter, right when the blog opened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As, I suppose, do Clarey&#8217;s own ample comments there; in fact he appears to have been the first commenter, right when the blog opened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog watcher</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/comment-page-1/#comment-81937</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 21:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-81937</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the one.  You can easily confirm by searching the blog archives that it was in first person and stopped way back in June, and the blog says so too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the one.  You can easily confirm by searching the blog archives that it was in first person and stopped way back in June, and the blog says so too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Aqui</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/comment-page-1/#comment-81903</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Aqui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 21:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-81903</guid>
		<description>I found that one, but I didn&#039;t think it was the same. Do you have actual knowledge that it used to impersonate him and was since changed, or are you speculating?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found that one, but I didn&#8217;t think it was the same. Do you have actual knowledge that it used to impersonate him and was since changed, or are you speculating?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog watcher</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/comment-page-1/#comment-81884</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 20:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-81884</guid>
		<description>The blog would appear to be at aaronclarey.blogspot.com.  It also doesn&#039;t impersonate Clarey right now.  It did, but was converted to the third person as soon as Clarey requested that it not be published in the first person, so Clarey appears to be suing more to shut down free speech than anything else.  It also carries no &quot;false claims&quot; of any fact - it links to racist sentiments on the &quot;Captain Capitalism&quot; blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blog would appear to be at aaronclarey.blogspot.com.  It also doesn&#8217;t impersonate Clarey right now.  It did, but was converted to the third person as soon as Clarey requested that it not be published in the first person, so Clarey appears to be suing more to shut down free speech than anything else.  It also carries no &#8220;false claims&#8221; of any fact &#8211; it links to racist sentiments on the &#8220;Captain Capitalism&#8221; blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

