Comments on: Blogging lawsuit http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/ Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable. Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:15:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Web 2.0 » Blog Archives » SOASTA Founder Talks SOA And Services http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-90748 Web 2.0 » Blog Archives » SOASTA Founder Talks SOA And Services Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:35:53 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-90748 [...] Donklephant - Oct 5, 2006… on Thursday, October 5th, 2006 and is filed under General, Blogging, Satire, Media, Law. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. … Continue [...] [...] Donklephant - Oct 5, 2006… on Thursday, October 5th, 2006 and is filed under General, Blogging, Satire, Media, Law. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. … Continue [...]

]]> By: Sanjay Fan http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-88261 Sanjay Fan Sat, 21 Oct 2006 03:15:08 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-88261 I don't get it... what is Clarey suing for? Seems like Sanjay is just ragging on the guy for the whacked things that he said. As for the impersonation thing, he stopped doing the impersonation, so Clarey just wants monetary damages now? Also, why did Clarey remove all the things that Sanjay is criticizing? Seems to me that Clarey got called on his offensive comments and now he is doing clean up. As if that will get his credibility back. Yeah, I live in MN and I have heard the guy on 1500. Now that he has deleted and cleaned up his blog it seems like he is scared - I don't know what to think of him. Frankly, this makes him look like an @$$. Also, how is he getting around MN Stat 543.19 subd 1(a)(3)? Basically it says that MN will not exercise personal jurisdiction over out of state tort defendants when the cause of action lies in defamation or privacy. The attorneys are going to have to get the courts to ignore the legislature. Good luck with that! I also do not understand the whole state court thing... I suppose the amount in controvery is not high enough. This one will be fun to watch. I cannot imagine that Clarey prevails... I don’t get it… what is Clarey suing for? Seems like Sanjay is just ragging on the guy for the whacked things that he said. As for the impersonation thing, he stopped doing the impersonation, so Clarey just wants monetary damages now?

Also, why did Clarey remove all the things that Sanjay is criticizing? Seems to me that Clarey got called on his offensive comments and now he is doing clean up. As if that will get his credibility back. Yeah, I live in MN and I have heard the guy on 1500. Now that he has deleted and cleaned up his blog it seems like he is scared - I don’t know what to think of him. Frankly, this makes him look like an @$$.

Also, how is he getting around MN Stat 543.19 subd 1(a)(3)? Basically it says that MN will not exercise personal jurisdiction over out of state tort defendants when the cause of action lies in defamation or privacy. The attorneys are going to have to get the courts to ignore the legislature. Good luck with that! I also do not understand the whole state court thing… I suppose the amount in controvery is not high enough.

This one will be fun to watch. I cannot imagine that Clarey prevails…

]]> By: Entelliblog » Blog Archive » Verio Adds Free Blogging and Photo Gallery Tools http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-86640 Entelliblog » Blog Archive » Verio Adds Free Blogging and Photo Gallery Tools Wed, 18 Oct 2006 01:12:20 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-86640 [...] Blogging lawsuitDonklephant - Oct 5, 2006… Most likely, thanks to his prominence as an economist and radio host. But let s look past him. Is blogging alone enough to make someone a public figure? … [...] [...] Blogging lawsuitDonklephant - Oct 5, 2006… Most likely, thanks to his prominence as an economist and radio host. But let s look past him. Is blogging alone enough to make someone a public figure? … [...]

]]> By: Captain Capitalism http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-82315 Captain Capitalism Sun, 08 Oct 2006 00:04:47 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-82315 Hi Guys, Just wanted to calm any fears that the law suit is about quelching the freedom of speech. The impersonation web site in its previous form was certainly an impersonation, face, name, e-mail everything. In its current form it's debateable if its defamitory, though people have the right to lay whatever criticism they want. Regardless, wanted to make sure that people knew the intention is not to somehow limit the freedom of speech. Additionally, I'm betting nuts to bolts "Blog Watcher" is Sanjay himself. Enjoy! Hi Guys,

Just wanted to calm any fears that the law suit is about quelching the freedom of speech. The impersonation web site in its previous form was certainly an impersonation, face, name, e-mail everything. In its current form it’s debateable if its defamitory, though people have the right to lay whatever criticism they want.

Regardless, wanted to make sure that people knew the intention is not to somehow limit the freedom of speech.

Additionally, I’m betting nuts to bolts “Blog Watcher” is Sanjay himself.

Enjoy!

]]> By: Blog watcher http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-81938 Blog watcher Fri, 06 Oct 2006 21:48:12 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-81938 As, I suppose, do Clarey's own ample comments there; in fact he appears to have been the first commenter, right when the blog opened. As, I suppose, do Clarey’s own ample comments there; in fact he appears to have been the first commenter, right when the blog opened.

]]> By: Blog watcher http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-81937 Blog watcher Fri, 06 Oct 2006 21:47:15 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-81937 That's the one. You can easily confirm by searching the blog archives that it was in first person and stopped way back in June, and the blog says so too. That’s the one. You can easily confirm by searching the blog archives that it was in first person and stopped way back in June, and the blog says so too.

]]> By: Sean Aqui http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-81903 Sean Aqui Fri, 06 Oct 2006 21:07:07 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-81903 I found that one, but I didn't think it was the same. Do you have actual knowledge that it used to impersonate him and was since changed, or are you speculating? I found that one, but I didn’t think it was the same. Do you have actual knowledge that it used to impersonate him and was since changed, or are you speculating?

]]> By: Blog watcher http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-81884 Blog watcher Fri, 06 Oct 2006 20:11:18 +0000 http://donklephant.com/2006/10/05/blogging-lawsuit-2/#comment-81884 The blog would appear to be at aaronclarey.blogspot.com. It also doesn't impersonate Clarey right now. It did, but was converted to the third person as soon as Clarey requested that it not be published in the first person, so Clarey appears to be suing more to shut down free speech than anything else. It also carries no "false claims" of any fact - it links to racist sentiments on the "Captain Capitalism" blog. The blog would appear to be at aaronclarey.blogspot.com. It also doesn’t impersonate Clarey right now. It did, but was converted to the third person as soon as Clarey requested that it not be published in the first person, so Clarey appears to be suing more to shut down free speech than anything else. It also carries no “false claims” of any fact - it links to racist sentiments on the “Captain Capitalism” blog.

]]>