Algae-To-Biofuel Technology Developed By High Schoolers

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Environment, Money, Science

A new way to help solve our global addiction?

Holly Jacobson and Tessa Churchill, seniors at Greely High School in Cumberland, are at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology today, explaining how they would use fast-growing algae to help solve the energy crisis.

In a nutshell, the young women may have found a way to produce more biodiesel fuel while consuming fewer organic resources.

The project got its start two years ago when Jacobson and Churchill began examining natural oils stored in fatty acids — called lipids — in various forms of marine algae. Recently, they identified a strain of algae that produces more oil for a given mass.

Intriguing stuff.


This entry was posted on Sunday, November 5th, 2006 and is filed under Environment, Money, Science. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Responses to “Algae-To-Biofuel Technology Developed By High Schoolers”

  1. DosPeros Says:

    Did ya know that you can make ethanol out of almost any bio-mass?

  2. sleipner Says:

    Bacteria definitely show a lot of promise for processing various materials into biofuels, or even in creating electricity directly from processing waste. The main difficulty is that bacterial processes generally are slow and inefficient compared to chemical ones, and are difficult to ramp up to commercially useable scales.

    Genetically alteration (or even forced evolution) of such bacteria to improve efficiency and speed may make them more commercially viable.

    We seriously need to drop the food-to-fuel (corn or soy) biofuels programs though, since the energy return is truly pathetic, especially for corn. Switch grass and other non-food crops are far more economically and ecologically viable as biofuel production materials.

    And lastly, biofuels are merely a temporary stopgap measure helping with the foreign oil issue, not any sort of “green energy” answer to global warming. For that, we need to seriously invest in solar, wind, water, wave, and/or geothermal energies – a vital shift that will never occur under oil and energy company dominated politics.

  3. A3K Says:

    Sleipner, regarding this, “biofuels are merely a temporary stopgap measure helping with the foreign oil issue, not any sort of “green energyâ€Â? answer to global warming”, you may be right, but if an efficient process for turning CO2 exhaust into biofuels using algae is found, there’s enough energy that could be produced to completely replace all of our current petroleum use, or the equivalent in coal/nat gas use.

    So while it would be nice to see solar, wind, wave and geothermal carry their weight, the 800 pound gorilla of renewable energy is algae.

  4. Irving Backman Says:

    Our organization has been funding and developing new technology for over 30 years and we are familiar with the potentials of algea as a superior source of feedstock for biofuels. Methods to grow and harvest on a commercial scale have been developed, but faster growing species would be helpful. Do you have any ideas in this regard or would you like to discuss if our technology may suppliment or compliment yours. This could be the fuel of the future.
    Email me your phone number if you wish to discuss and tell me the best time to contact you. Likewise, I can provide you with my phone number.
    Regards, Irving Backman

  5. VR Ganni Says:

    Please give us some tips to produce biodsiesel from marine algae. We want to know a cost effective system.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: