<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will The Vatican Get Religion On Condoms?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:33:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mike mcEachran</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/comment-page-1/#comment-412492</link>
		<dc:creator>mike mcEachran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/#comment-412492</guid>
		<description>Jesus said exactly nothing about sex, except for a few minterpreted passages about divorce.  To him morality was taking care of the sick and the poor and forgiving and being of service to others.  So if you&#039;re following Jesus&#039;s words for direction, then it seems caring for the ill trumps judging other people&#039;s sexuality.  Maybe the Catholics are finally reading the Bible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus said exactly nothing about sex, except for a few minterpreted passages about divorce.  To him morality was taking care of the sick and the poor and forgiving and being of service to others.  So if you&#8217;re following Jesus&#8217;s words for direction, then it seems caring for the ill trumps judging other people&#8217;s sexuality.  Maybe the Catholics are finally reading the Bible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hgh</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/comment-page-1/#comment-412483</link>
		<dc:creator>hgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/#comment-412483</guid>
		<description>The current Vatican has been occupied since 1958.
I disgree</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current Vatican has been occupied since 1958.<br />
I disgree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hghlook.com</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/comment-page-1/#comment-313815</link>
		<dc:creator>hghlook.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/#comment-313815</guid>
		<description>I agree with James.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with James.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sleipner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/comment-page-1/#comment-124938</link>
		<dc:creator>sleipner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 03:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/#comment-124938</guid>
		<description>The only things that cannot be changed are the closed minds of idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only things that cannot be changed are the closed minds of idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infojunkie</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/comment-page-1/#comment-124373</link>
		<dc:creator>Infojunkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/#comment-124373</guid>
		<description>The current Vatican has been occupied since 1958 -- see october1958.com -- and has already issued many moral contradictions concerning Catholic morality. &quot;The Church will be in eclipse,&quot; warned Our Lady of Lasalette in 1846 -- and we are there. Any such &quot;morality&quot; decision is null and voide from the start -- because Ratzinger is an antipope; everything that needs to be said on this question was said in Casti Canubi by Pope Pius XI in 1931. All sexual acts should be between a man and a woman in marriage -- with the transmission of life always possible via that act. This is already defined Catholic teaching -- cannot be changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current Vatican has been occupied since 1958 &#8212; see october1958.com &#8212; and has already issued many moral contradictions concerning Catholic morality. &#8220;The Church will be in eclipse,&#8221; warned Our Lady of Lasalette in 1846 &#8212; and we are there. Any such &#8220;morality&#8221; decision is null and voide from the start &#8212; because Ratzinger is an antipope; everything that needs to be said on this question was said in Casti Canubi by Pope Pius XI in 1931. All sexual acts should be between a man and a woman in marriage &#8212; with the transmission of life always possible via that act. This is already defined Catholic teaching &#8212; cannot be changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sleipner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/comment-page-1/#comment-123018</link>
		<dc:creator>sleipner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/#comment-123018</guid>
		<description>Heil Ratzinger!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heil Ratzinger!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DosPeros</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/comment-page-1/#comment-122341</link>
		<dc:creator>DosPeros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/#comment-122341</guid>
		<description>It will never happen, especially with Benedict XVI and it shouldn&#039;t happen.  The Vatican isn&#039;t in the business of capitulating moral doctrine to human weakness and evil for utilitarian expediency.  Sorry, Justin -- just don&#039;t hold your breathe.  His name is Ratzinger not Pelosi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will never happen, especially with Benedict XVI and it shouldn&#8217;t happen.  The Vatican isn&#8217;t in the business of capitulating moral doctrine to human weakness and evil for utilitarian expediency.  Sorry, Justin &#8212; just don&#8217;t hold your breathe.  His name is Ratzinger not Pelosi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/comment-page-1/#comment-122333</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/#comment-122333</guid>
		<description>Honestly, the problem isn&#039;t with the Vatican approving of disproving condoms.  They state in fact that you should not have sex before marriage and then not to commit adultery.  If devotees followed these rules then this wouldn&#039;t be an issue.  I think the issue for the Catholic Church is that devotees may follow only part of this rule, either having sex before marriage or committing adultery.  I wish more credit would be given to the moral ideals of the church rather than living in the exception and mocking them for having a religiously ideal position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, the problem isn&#8217;t with the Vatican approving of disproving condoms.  They state in fact that you should not have sex before marriage and then not to commit adultery.  If devotees followed these rules then this wouldn&#8217;t be an issue.  I think the issue for the Catholic Church is that devotees may follow only part of this rule, either having sex before marriage or committing adultery.  I wish more credit would be given to the moral ideals of the church rather than living in the exception and mocking them for having a religiously ideal position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr. a.</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/comment-page-1/#comment-122037</link>
		<dc:creator>dr. a.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/#comment-122037</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://wind-sand-and-stars.blogspot.com/2006/11/stormont-pantomime.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Terror strikes at the seat of Northern Ireland Government&lt;/a&gt; It would be farcical if it wasn&#039;t such a serious situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://wind-sand-and-stars.blogspot.com/2006/11/stormont-pantomime.html" rel="nofollow">Terror strikes at the seat of Northern Ireland Government</a> It would be farcical if it wasn&#8217;t such a serious situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/comment-page-1/#comment-121514</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/#comment-121514</guid>
		<description>Hey, maybe they&#039;ll realize things. More important miracles have happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, maybe they&#8217;ll realize things. More important miracles have happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy the Dhimmi</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/comment-page-1/#comment-121109</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy the Dhimmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/#comment-121109</guid>
		<description>If there is a change, It will be regarding married couples only</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is a change, It will be regarding married couples only</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sleipner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/comment-page-1/#comment-121061</link>
		<dc:creator>sleipner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/11/23/will-the-vatican-get-religion-on-condoms/#comment-121061</guid>
		<description>Wow, they&#039;re finally being dragged kicking and screaming into the 19th century!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, they&#8217;re finally being dragged kicking and screaming into the 19th century!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
