<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robert Gates Is New Defense Secretary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2006/12/06/robert-gates-is-new-defense-secretary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/06/robert-gates-is-new-defense-secretary/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:07:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: statusquomustgo</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/06/robert-gates-is-new-defense-secretary/comment-page-1/#comment-139969</link>
		<dc:creator>statusquomustgo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/06/robert-gates-is-new-defense-secretary/#comment-139969</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get it... these people are all recycled criminals that lied to congress during the 80&#039;s.   He was into Iran contra up to his azz.

Please somebody... READ HISTORY!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it&#8230; these people are all recycled criminals that lied to congress during the 80&#8217;s.   He was into Iran contra up to his azz.</p>
<p>Please somebody&#8230; READ HISTORY!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sleipner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/06/robert-gates-is-new-defense-secretary/comment-page-1/#comment-136236</link>
		<dc:creator>sleipner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 23:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/06/robert-gates-is-new-defense-secretary/#comment-136236</guid>
		<description>Those two voting against him actually makes me feel better about his selection...maybe he&#039;s not as much of a loser as almost all of Bush&#039;s other appointments...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those two voting against him actually makes me feel better about his selection&#8230;maybe he&#8217;s not as much of a loser as almost all of Bush&#8217;s other appointments&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob J Young</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/06/robert-gates-is-new-defense-secretary/comment-page-1/#comment-136203</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob J Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 22:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/06/robert-gates-is-new-defense-secretary/#comment-136203</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t the residents of Pennsylvania just decide that Santorum wasn&#039;t up to the task?  Thank god this is the last time we have to hear from this idiot.

Bunning on the other hand, is such an unethical piece of work he makes Santorum look good.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Bunning</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t the residents of Pennsylvania just decide that Santorum wasn&#8217;t up to the task?  Thank god this is the last time we have to hear from this idiot.</p>
<p>Bunning on the other hand, is such an unethical piece of work he makes Santorum look good.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Bunning" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Bunning</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: probligo</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/06/robert-gates-is-new-defense-secretary/comment-page-1/#comment-136009</link>
		<dc:creator>probligo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/06/robert-gates-is-new-defense-secretary/#comment-136009</guid>
		<description>Hey!! Santorum!!  You reckon that the policies of three years back,  or even six months back,  were working?

&quot;Sleepwalking through the storm&quot;?  Sure you have - for the past three nightmares.

Time for a new way.  ANY new way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!! Santorum!!  You reckon that the policies of three years back,  or even six months back,  were working?</p>
<p>&#8220;Sleepwalking through the storm&#8221;?  Sure you have &#8211; for the past three nightmares.</p>
<p>Time for a new way.  ANY new way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
