<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wacky IRS Tax Laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:33:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stray</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-155556</link>
		<dc:creator>Stray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/#comment-155556</guid>
		<description>Well, laugh if you want, but rules like this are how they nailed Al Capone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, laugh if you want, but rules like this are how they nailed Al Capone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-154324</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/#comment-154324</guid>
		<description>IIRC some states have tax-stamp laws for marijuana and other illegal drugs. Buying the stamps doesn&#039;t make the drugs legal, of course, but the aforementioned Al Capone principle still applies. Supposedly the stamps may be purchased anonymously, but I can&#039;t imagine that very many drug dealers actually bother to buy stamps for their drugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IIRC some states have tax-stamp laws for marijuana and other illegal drugs. Buying the stamps doesn&#8217;t make the drugs legal, of course, but the aforementioned Al Capone principle still applies. Supposedly the stamps may be purchased anonymously, but I can&#8217;t imagine that very many drug dealers actually bother to buy stamps for their drugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Aqui</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-153565</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Aqui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/#comment-153565</guid>
		<description>The most famous case involving such statutes is Al Capone. They never could nail him on criminal charges -- but they eventually got him on tax evasion for failing to report the proceeds of his criminal activities.

So while it seems wacky, there&#039;s a certain logic to it.

I also don&#039;t think the IRS is allowed to report such filings to criminal authorities. So it&#039;s possible to report your illegal income and not go to jail. All the IRS cares about is that they get &quot;their&quot; money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most famous case involving such statutes is Al Capone. They never could nail him on criminal charges &#8212; but they eventually got him on tax evasion for failing to report the proceeds of his criminal activities.</p>
<p>So while it seems wacky, there&#8217;s a certain logic to it.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t think the IRS is allowed to report such filings to criminal authorities. So it&#8217;s possible to report your illegal income and not go to jail. All the IRS cares about is that they get &#8220;their&#8221; money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicki Frei</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-150781</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Frei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/#comment-150781</guid>
		<description>Actually, only a couple of Nevada&#039;s counties still have legal prostitution, Nye and one of the tiny northern counties outside Reno - the name of which escapes me at this point (it&#039;s the one where Mustang - a cathouse community - is the ONLY viable income-producing entity....)

And have to fully agree as regards the &quot;stupidity of creating evidence against yourself just for the satisifaction of the IRS&quot; - fortunately, most people aren&#039;t that dim.... of course, I get to say stuff like that, since I don&#039;t cheat on taxes or do anything else illegal (other than beat the speed limit 5mph or so) - and I&#039;m not being facetious.... I&#039;m still an extremely law-abiding card-carrying member of the establishment, 45 years on.... (oh well - FAR too late now....)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, only a couple of Nevada&#8217;s counties still have legal prostitution, Nye and one of the tiny northern counties outside Reno &#8211; the name of which escapes me at this point (it&#8217;s the one where Mustang &#8211; a cathouse community &#8211; is the ONLY viable income-producing entity&#8230;.)</p>
<p>And have to fully agree as regards the &#8220;stupidity of creating evidence against yourself just for the satisifaction of the IRS&#8221; &#8211; fortunately, most people aren&#8217;t that dim&#8230;. of course, I get to say stuff like that, since I don&#8217;t cheat on taxes or do anything else illegal (other than beat the speed limit 5mph or so) &#8211; and I&#8217;m not being facetious&#8230;. I&#8217;m still an extremely law-abiding card-carrying member of the establishment, 45 years on&#8230;. (oh well &#8211; FAR too late now&#8230;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DosPeros</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-150763</link>
		<dc:creator>DosPeros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/#comment-150763</guid>
		<description>Vicki - that is a classic &amp; informative tale of sex and taxes.  Of course, hooking is legal in Nevada and so that makes it a bit more rational.  What we are talking about here is really no different than reverse sin taxes.  I kind of respect the &quot;code&quot; in this sence, it is true to the spirit of Section 61 (all income derived&quot;) and it recognizes the reality of human nature.  I actually think that unless someone was claiming tens of thousands of dollars from illegal activities, it probably wouldn&#039;t be &quot;reported&quot;, but that doesn&#039;t touch the stupidity of creating evidence against yourself just for the satisifaction of the IRS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vicki &#8211; that is a classic &amp; informative tale of sex and taxes.  Of course, hooking is legal in Nevada and so that makes it a bit more rational.  What we are talking about here is really no different than reverse sin taxes.  I kind of respect the &#8220;code&#8221; in this sence, it is true to the spirit of Section 61 (all income derived&#8221;) and it recognizes the reality of human nature.  I actually think that unless someone was claiming tens of thousands of dollars from illegal activities, it probably wouldn&#8217;t be &#8220;reported&#8221;, but that doesn&#8217;t touch the stupidity of creating evidence against yourself just for the satisifaction of the IRS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicki Frei</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-146639</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Frei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/#comment-146639</guid>
		<description>Dos - same sort of redundancy as &quot;weird cat&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dos &#8211; same sort of redundancy as &#8220;weird cat&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicki Frei</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-146637</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Frei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/#comment-146637</guid>
		<description>I worked for the Nevada State Welfare Division late 70s - mid 80s.  Lotta hookers on welfare back then.... we always &quot;advised&quot; them to report the &quot;side job&quot; income - and provide proof by notes/receipt copies from the johns.... In my 10 years there in and an Ongoing unit and later an Intake unit, I actually had one woman report (presumably) truthfully the amount she made hooking, and provide proof (notes/receipts from johns and jills - she wasn&#039;t &quot;straight up&quot;) about 67% of that income.

First year I was her eligibility caseworker, she remained on welfare, being just under the limit of &quot;real&quot; income for a woman with 2 children.  The next year, she wasn&#039;t eligible for further assistance.  By that time, it was okay with her:  she wrote a book, parlayed her not inconsiderable advance into a mortgage on a 4-plex, and last I heard was doing VERY VERY WELL.

I don&#039;t know if she reported the income to IRS.  Wasn&#039;t part of my job function - thankfully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked for the Nevada State Welfare Division late 70s &#8211; mid 80s.  Lotta hookers on welfare back then&#8230;. we always &#8220;advised&#8221; them to report the &#8220;side job&#8221; income &#8211; and provide proof by notes/receipt copies from the johns&#8230;. In my 10 years there in and an Ongoing unit and later an Intake unit, I actually had one woman report (presumably) truthfully the amount she made hooking, and provide proof (notes/receipts from johns and jills &#8211; she wasn&#8217;t &#8220;straight up&#8221;) about 67% of that income.</p>
<p>First year I was her eligibility caseworker, she remained on welfare, being just under the limit of &#8220;real&#8221; income for a woman with 2 children.  The next year, she wasn&#8217;t eligible for further assistance.  By that time, it was okay with her:  she wrote a book, parlayed her not inconsiderable advance into a mortgage on a 4-plex, and last I heard was doing VERY VERY WELL.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if she reported the income to IRS.  Wasn&#8217;t part of my job function &#8211; thankfully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DosPeros</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-144797</link>
		<dc:creator>DosPeros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/#comment-144797</guid>
		<description>There is a certain redundancy in the title to this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a certain redundancy in the title to this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sleipner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-144787</link>
		<dc:creator>sleipner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/14/wacky-irs-tax-laws/#comment-144787</guid>
		<description>Well, I know for a fact that many masseurs and escorts report only a portion, or sometimes none, of their income derived from those professions, especially if they have another source of income, such as a regular job (less likely to be investigated that way).  Also bartenders (and probably waiters) often severely underreport their tips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I know for a fact that many masseurs and escorts report only a portion, or sometimes none, of their income derived from those professions, especially if they have another source of income, such as a regular job (less likely to be investigated that way).  Also bartenders (and probably waiters) often severely underreport their tips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
