<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2nd Largest Oil Field Drying Up Faster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2006/12/26/2nd-largest-oil-field-drying-up-faster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/26/2nd-largest-oil-field-drying-up-faster/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:53:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Orlowski Zygmunt</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/26/2nd-largest-oil-field-drying-up-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-235966</link>
		<dc:creator>Orlowski Zygmunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 20:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/26/2nd-largest-oil-field-drying-up-faster/#comment-235966</guid>
		<description>New kind of  of clean energy!!!
Clean the air? It is possible. Clean water? It is possible too.
Clean energy? It is possible as well.
My idea is very difficult for understanding. It is not difficult for engineer - mechanic, who knows very good the Pascal&#039;s law and even-arm lever.
Please open GOOgle and find metozor and next :
index of metozor.
Overthere is all about idea of main . 
example : http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/for_greenpeace.html or
http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/energy_for_everybody.h...
http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/prolog_for_metoz.html
Too good to be true !!!
Energy sources.
http://nets.pl/~metozor/three_levers.html

I am inventor and owner of Metoz machine invention. Everyone can take absolutely and legitimate the METOZ invention and build the Metoz machine. I can help only. I can not build METOZ. I am moneyless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New kind of  of clean energy!!!<br />
Clean the air? It is possible. Clean water? It is possible too.<br />
Clean energy? It is possible as well.<br />
My idea is very difficult for understanding. It is not difficult for engineer &#8211; mechanic, who knows very good the Pascal&#8217;s law and even-arm lever.<br />
Please open GOOgle and find metozor and next :<br />
index of metozor.<br />
Overthere is all about idea of main .<br />
example : <a href="http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/for_greenpeace.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/for_greenpeace.html</a> or<br />
<a href="http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/energy_for_everybody.h.." rel="nofollow">http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/energy_for_everybody.h..</a>.<br />
<a href="http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/prolog_for_metoz.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/prolog_for_metoz.html</a><br />
Too good to be true !!!<br />
Energy sources.<br />
<a href="http://nets.pl/~metozor/three_levers.html" rel="nofollow">http://nets.pl/~metozor/three_levers.html</a></p>
<p>I am inventor and owner of Metoz machine invention. Everyone can take absolutely and legitimate the METOZ invention and build the Metoz machine. I can help only. I can not build METOZ. I am moneyless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HealthReviews.org</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/26/2nd-largest-oil-field-drying-up-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-173333</link>
		<dc:creator>HealthReviews.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 00:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/26/2nd-largest-oil-field-drying-up-faster/#comment-173333</guid>
		<description>This is truly a great blog! Keep on posting such interesting subjects! I already bookmarked your blog and I will recommend it to some of my friends. James Spade</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is truly a great blog! Keep on posting such interesting subjects! I already bookmarked your blog and I will recommend it to some of my friends. James Spade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Engineer-Poet</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/26/2nd-largest-oil-field-drying-up-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-172534</link>
		<dc:creator>Engineer-Poet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 05:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/26/2nd-largest-oil-field-drying-up-faster/#comment-172534</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s on keelynet, you should RUN (not walk) to a physicist for an explanation of why it&#039;s hogwash (unless you can find it yourself with a search engine).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s on keelynet, you should RUN (not walk) to a physicist for an explanation of why it&#8217;s hogwash (unless you can find it yourself with a search engine).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Kenney</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/26/2nd-largest-oil-field-drying-up-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-170204</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Kenney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 03:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/26/2nd-largest-oil-field-drying-up-faster/#comment-170204</guid>
		<description>Did you or anyone else ever test this invention? If so what were the conclusions? Can it generate enough hydrogen to run a car?
Found it on the news link on this web site. I feel the author is a little suspect but the origional invention looks honest. What&#039;s your opinion?
http://www.wam-a-bam.com/hydrockickbank.html
http://www.wam-a-bam.com/Newscb.html
Dennis Kenney
 

This file was originally posted on the KeelyNet BBS on December 3, 1993 as 
GARRETT1.ASC.
The Next Step in
Energy Production, Engines and Lighting
by Jerry W. Decker for KeelyNet
(with apologies to the Dallas Morning News, the Van Nostrand Scientific 
Encylopedia and the US Patent Office)

For years we have heard stories about a demonstration of a car that ran on 
water here in the Dallas area. Never was there any text substantiation or 
other documents relating details. Many of our friends had also heard the 
story with hints of a green pill or powder that was added to the water while 
in the gas tank that somehow made it combustible with no further actions 
taken beyond the simple ignition via a high intensity spark.

About three years ago, our friends Howard and Joanne Bond sent us a short 
newspaper clipping describing the demonstration. The article indicates a 
patent was secured for the &quot;something&quot; that made the car run on water. That 
has kept me inspired all this time and made me keep an eye and ear out for 
additional information.

The basic story as I heard it was that the inventor of the traffic light, Dad 
Garrett, failed to get a patent on the idea. Every city adopted his traffic light 
invention for which Dad Garrett received little in return. He and his son 
Charles invented other devices, among them a means of making an 
automobile engine run on water, but I never heard of a patent issued on this.
To promote the discovery, a public demonstration was held at White Rock 
Lake in Dallas somewhere around 1934. The event was covered by news 
media of the day and we understand there was a Pathe&#039; or Movietone 
newsreel. An automobile was towed to the lake site. We do not know the 
type of automobile or whether it was a 6 or 8 cylinder engine. A gallon of 
water was removed from the lake and put into the gas tank. The car was then 
started and driven around the lake with no problems.

Several months back, I decided to do whatever it would take to dig up this 
patent, if it existed. I knew from the article that a Dad Garrett and his son 
Charles had invented this &quot;something&quot;. I did not know the year of this 
alledged patent and so had to go through several volumes looking for 
anything relating to Garrett. Sometimes inventors assign their invention to 
companies and that posed an additional problem if such was the case.

I finally did find a patent issued to Charles H. Garrett on July 2, 1935 and 
called an ELECTROLYTIC CARBURETOR. The number was 2,006,676. Since 
the microfiles only go back to about the mid-40&#039;s, I had no option except to 
order it from the patent office. A letter was sent to them with $2.00 ($1.50 for 
the patent and .50 for mailing costs). After almost 3 months, I got a letter 
saying that patents had now gone up to $3.00. So, another letter with the 
extra $1.00 FINALLY got me the patent about 3 weeks later.

I have been calling it a HYDROLYTIC CARBURETOR because of WHAT it is 
combusting and have been totally amazed at the simplicity of the 
technology. Several of our associates have received advance copies of it 
and are quite impressed, saying they will build and test it. We too will test it 
and openly share our findings.

Please feel free to pass this file around.
The newspaper articles are included in this file for the exact information as 
published from the 1935 demonstration to the latest modern report of which I 
am aware.

Bob Aldrich of Survivor BBS in LA gave us additional patent numbers 
pertaining to the Horvath patents for electrolysis to power an automobile 
engine. Of those patents, the Garrett patent was NEVER listed as a &quot;prior art&quot; 
patent. That is quite odd as it PRECEDES several of the points made by the 
Horvath patent, not to mention being SO SIMPLE. Experiments will be 
carried out on the Garrett design and we and our fellow experimenters will 
share our findings for those interested. The potential is ENORMOUS.

What follows is the story confirming that no green pill was involved in the 
process and which Howard and Joanne Bond sent to KeelyNet.
Dallas Morning News - 1992 - Long Format
Column : TEXAS SKETCHES
Headline : Early inventor builds water-powered auto
Date : September 6, 1992
Section : TEXAS &amp; SOUTHWEST
Page : 48A
Edition : HOME FINAL
Author : A.C. Greene
Word Count : 398
Text :

The late Henry &quot;Dad&quot; Garrett was a multi-talented Dallas inventor with a bent 
for electrical contrivances, and in 1935, he and his son, C.H. Garrett, patented 
and exhibited an automobile that ran on water -- actually, on hydrogen after 
the water was broken down by electrolysis.

Dad Garrett was already famous for his work. In 1920 he set up WRR in 
Dallas, the world&#039;s first municipal radio station, and was its first announcer. 
He was the first man to build a radio in his car, and he developed radio 
transmission from the car for police use. He also invented an automatic 
electric traffic signal, possibly the nation&#039;s first.

Eugene P. Aldredge recalled the Garretts: &quot;I had rented a small office on the 
seventh floor of the Allen building in downtown Dallas for my letter service, 
and one of my early customers was the eighteenth floor National Electric 
Signal Co. owned by Dad Garrett and son C.H..

&quot;I was informed that the two were experimenting with an automobile that 
used water for fuel, that they carried on their experiments in a workshop 
adjacent to their office on the top floor, and that two separate explosions 
(from dangerous hydrogen) had nearly blown a hole in the roof of the 
building...Neither was hurt.&quot;

On September 8, 1935, The Dallas Morning News first announced that the 
water-fuel concept worked -- at least it worked for &quot;several minutes,&quot; the 
article reported.

A few months later, Pathe&#039; News filmed the car driving along Garland Road 
with the driver stopping at White Rock Lake to fill the fuel tank with water 
before cruising off. In 1970, Karen Klinefelter wrote, &quot;Aptly enough, the film 
was shown on Pathe&#039;s Stranger than Fiction feature program.&quot;

C.H. Garrett said the only items needed to convert a gasoline-engine auto to 
a water burner was an electrolytic carburetor and installation of a generator 
of double normal capacity for the breaking down of the water.
He claimed instant starts in any weather, no fire hazards, cooler operation 
and plenty of power and speed. The car was not marketed, and no one 
seems to know its ultimate destiny. Both Garretts died a number of years 
ago.

[A.C. Greene is an author and Texas historian who lives in Salado.]

The original September 8, 1935 article that I found on microfilm in the Dallas 
Library.
Dallasite Patents Invention
Which He Claims Substitutes
Water for Gasoline as Fuel
C.H. Garrett, Dallas inventor, gave a private demonstration Saturday of a 
recently patented contrivance which he said substituted water for gasoline 
as fuel for internal combustion engines.
He said it broke up the water by electrolysis into its component gases, 
oxygen and hydrogen, using the highly explosive hydrogen for fuel in the 
motor cylinder.
The working model operated a four-cylinder engine for several minutes in 
the demonstration, at varying speeds and with several starts and stops. 
Garrett said he had operated the engine continuously for more than 
forty-eight hours.

The inventor said the idea itself was not new. He explained that difficulty had 
been encountered heretofore in attempts to store the dangerously 
inflammable hydrogen. He claimed to have AVOIDED that trouble by making 
and exploding the gas in the SAME PROCESS without a storage chamber in 
which the flames from the motor cylinders might react.

Water, he explained, is broken down into its component gases by passage of 
an electric current through it from electrodes immersed in the water. 
Hydrogen collects at the negative pole and oxygen at the positive. The 
hydrogen, Garrett said, is MIXED WITH AIR (78% nitrogen and other 
gases...Vanguard) and introduced DIRECTLY INTO THE CYLINDERS.
The inventor said he had been working on the device for eight years, 
assisted by his father, Henry Garrett, traffic signal engineer for the city of 
Dallas, inventor of the traffic signal system, now in use here and holder of 
several patents on such contrivances.

Garrett said attachment of the electrolytic carburetor and installation of a 
generator of about DOUBLE normal capacity to furnish power for the 
breaking down of the water were the only changes needed to convert a 
gasoline burning automobile into a WATER BURNER!
He said the electrolysis chamber would have to VARY IN SIZE with the size 
of the motor used. One of ABOUT A QUART CAPACITY being big enough for 
the ordinary automobile.
He claimed instantaneous starting in any weather, elimination of fire 
hazards, cooler motor operation and fulfilling of all motor requirements in 
power and speed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you or anyone else ever test this invention? If so what were the conclusions? Can it generate enough hydrogen to run a car?<br />
Found it on the news link on this web site. I feel the author is a little suspect but the origional invention looks honest. What&#8217;s your opinion?<br />
<a href="http://www.wam-a-bam.com/hydrockickbank.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.wam-a-bam.com/hydrockickbank.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.wam-a-bam.com/Newscb.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.wam-a-bam.com/Newscb.html</a><br />
Dennis Kenney</p>
<p>This file was originally posted on the KeelyNet BBS on December 3, 1993 as<br />
GARRETT1.ASC.<br />
The Next Step in<br />
Energy Production, Engines and Lighting<br />
by Jerry W. Decker for KeelyNet<br />
(with apologies to the Dallas Morning News, the Van Nostrand Scientific<br />
Encylopedia and the US Patent Office)</p>
<p>For years we have heard stories about a demonstration of a car that ran on<br />
water here in the Dallas area. Never was there any text substantiation or<br />
other documents relating details. Many of our friends had also heard the<br />
story with hints of a green pill or powder that was added to the water while<br />
in the gas tank that somehow made it combustible with no further actions<br />
taken beyond the simple ignition via a high intensity spark.</p>
<p>About three years ago, our friends Howard and Joanne Bond sent us a short<br />
newspaper clipping describing the demonstration. The article indicates a<br />
patent was secured for the &#8220;something&#8221; that made the car run on water. That<br />
has kept me inspired all this time and made me keep an eye and ear out for<br />
additional information.</p>
<p>The basic story as I heard it was that the inventor of the traffic light, Dad<br />
Garrett, failed to get a patent on the idea. Every city adopted his traffic light<br />
invention for which Dad Garrett received little in return. He and his son<br />
Charles invented other devices, among them a means of making an<br />
automobile engine run on water, but I never heard of a patent issued on this.<br />
To promote the discovery, a public demonstration was held at White Rock<br />
Lake in Dallas somewhere around 1934. The event was covered by news<br />
media of the day and we understand there was a Pathe&#8217; or Movietone<br />
newsreel. An automobile was towed to the lake site. We do not know the<br />
type of automobile or whether it was a 6 or 8 cylinder engine. A gallon of<br />
water was removed from the lake and put into the gas tank. The car was then<br />
started and driven around the lake with no problems.</p>
<p>Several months back, I decided to do whatever it would take to dig up this<br />
patent, if it existed. I knew from the article that a Dad Garrett and his son<br />
Charles had invented this &#8220;something&#8221;. I did not know the year of this<br />
alledged patent and so had to go through several volumes looking for<br />
anything relating to Garrett. Sometimes inventors assign their invention to<br />
companies and that posed an additional problem if such was the case.</p>
<p>I finally did find a patent issued to Charles H. Garrett on July 2, 1935 and<br />
called an ELECTROLYTIC CARBURETOR. The number was 2,006,676. Since<br />
the microfiles only go back to about the mid-40&#8217;s, I had no option except to<br />
order it from the patent office. A letter was sent to them with $2.00 ($1.50 for<br />
the patent and .50 for mailing costs). After almost 3 months, I got a letter<br />
saying that patents had now gone up to $3.00. So, another letter with the<br />
extra $1.00 FINALLY got me the patent about 3 weeks later.</p>
<p>I have been calling it a HYDROLYTIC CARBURETOR because of WHAT it is<br />
combusting and have been totally amazed at the simplicity of the<br />
technology. Several of our associates have received advance copies of it<br />
and are quite impressed, saying they will build and test it. We too will test it<br />
and openly share our findings.</p>
<p>Please feel free to pass this file around.<br />
The newspaper articles are included in this file for the exact information as<br />
published from the 1935 demonstration to the latest modern report of which I<br />
am aware.</p>
<p>Bob Aldrich of Survivor BBS in LA gave us additional patent numbers<br />
pertaining to the Horvath patents for electrolysis to power an automobile<br />
engine. Of those patents, the Garrett patent was NEVER listed as a &#8220;prior art&#8221;<br />
patent. That is quite odd as it PRECEDES several of the points made by the<br />
Horvath patent, not to mention being SO SIMPLE. Experiments will be<br />
carried out on the Garrett design and we and our fellow experimenters will<br />
share our findings for those interested. The potential is ENORMOUS.</p>
<p>What follows is the story confirming that no green pill was involved in the<br />
process and which Howard and Joanne Bond sent to KeelyNet.<br />
Dallas Morning News &#8211; 1992 &#8211; Long Format<br />
Column : TEXAS SKETCHES<br />
Headline : Early inventor builds water-powered auto<br />
Date : September 6, 1992<br />
Section : TEXAS &amp; SOUTHWEST<br />
Page : 48A<br />
Edition : HOME FINAL<br />
Author : A.C. Greene<br />
Word Count : 398<br />
Text :</p>
<p>The late Henry &#8220;Dad&#8221; Garrett was a multi-talented Dallas inventor with a bent<br />
for electrical contrivances, and in 1935, he and his son, C.H. Garrett, patented<br />
and exhibited an automobile that ran on water &#8212; actually, on hydrogen after<br />
the water was broken down by electrolysis.</p>
<p>Dad Garrett was already famous for his work. In 1920 he set up WRR in<br />
Dallas, the world&#8217;s first municipal radio station, and was its first announcer.<br />
He was the first man to build a radio in his car, and he developed radio<br />
transmission from the car for police use. He also invented an automatic<br />
electric traffic signal, possibly the nation&#8217;s first.</p>
<p>Eugene P. Aldredge recalled the Garretts: &#8220;I had rented a small office on the<br />
seventh floor of the Allen building in downtown Dallas for my letter service,<br />
and one of my early customers was the eighteenth floor National Electric<br />
Signal Co. owned by Dad Garrett and son C.H..</p>
<p>&#8220;I was informed that the two were experimenting with an automobile that<br />
used water for fuel, that they carried on their experiments in a workshop<br />
adjacent to their office on the top floor, and that two separate explosions<br />
(from dangerous hydrogen) had nearly blown a hole in the roof of the<br />
building&#8230;Neither was hurt.&#8221;</p>
<p>On September 8, 1935, The Dallas Morning News first announced that the<br />
water-fuel concept worked &#8212; at least it worked for &#8220;several minutes,&#8221; the<br />
article reported.</p>
<p>A few months later, Pathe&#8217; News filmed the car driving along Garland Road<br />
with the driver stopping at White Rock Lake to fill the fuel tank with water<br />
before cruising off. In 1970, Karen Klinefelter wrote, &#8220;Aptly enough, the film<br />
was shown on Pathe&#8217;s Stranger than Fiction feature program.&#8221;</p>
<p>C.H. Garrett said the only items needed to convert a gasoline-engine auto to<br />
a water burner was an electrolytic carburetor and installation of a generator<br />
of double normal capacity for the breaking down of the water.<br />
He claimed instant starts in any weather, no fire hazards, cooler operation<br />
and plenty of power and speed. The car was not marketed, and no one<br />
seems to know its ultimate destiny. Both Garretts died a number of years<br />
ago.</p>
<p>[A.C. Greene is an author and Texas historian who lives in Salado.]</p>
<p>The original September 8, 1935 article that I found on microfilm in the Dallas<br />
Library.<br />
Dallasite Patents Invention<br />
Which He Claims Substitutes<br />
Water for Gasoline as Fuel<br />
C.H. Garrett, Dallas inventor, gave a private demonstration Saturday of a<br />
recently patented contrivance which he said substituted water for gasoline<br />
as fuel for internal combustion engines.<br />
He said it broke up the water by electrolysis into its component gases,<br />
oxygen and hydrogen, using the highly explosive hydrogen for fuel in the<br />
motor cylinder.<br />
The working model operated a four-cylinder engine for several minutes in<br />
the demonstration, at varying speeds and with several starts and stops.<br />
Garrett said he had operated the engine continuously for more than<br />
forty-eight hours.</p>
<p>The inventor said the idea itself was not new. He explained that difficulty had<br />
been encountered heretofore in attempts to store the dangerously<br />
inflammable hydrogen. He claimed to have AVOIDED that trouble by making<br />
and exploding the gas in the SAME PROCESS without a storage chamber in<br />
which the flames from the motor cylinders might react.</p>
<p>Water, he explained, is broken down into its component gases by passage of<br />
an electric current through it from electrodes immersed in the water.<br />
Hydrogen collects at the negative pole and oxygen at the positive. The<br />
hydrogen, Garrett said, is MIXED WITH AIR (78% nitrogen and other<br />
gases&#8230;Vanguard) and introduced DIRECTLY INTO THE CYLINDERS.<br />
The inventor said he had been working on the device for eight years,<br />
assisted by his father, Henry Garrett, traffic signal engineer for the city of<br />
Dallas, inventor of the traffic signal system, now in use here and holder of<br />
several patents on such contrivances.</p>
<p>Garrett said attachment of the electrolytic carburetor and installation of a<br />
generator of about DOUBLE normal capacity to furnish power for the<br />
breaking down of the water were the only changes needed to convert a<br />
gasoline burning automobile into a WATER BURNER!<br />
He said the electrolysis chamber would have to VARY IN SIZE with the size<br />
of the motor used. One of ABOUT A QUART CAPACITY being big enough for<br />
the ordinary automobile.<br />
He claimed instantaneous starting in any weather, elimination of fire<br />
hazards, cooler motor operation and fulfilling of all motor requirements in<br />
power and speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Engineer-Poet</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/26/2nd-largest-oil-field-drying-up-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-169258</link>
		<dc:creator>Engineer-Poet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 06:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/26/2nd-largest-oil-field-drying-up-faster/#comment-169258</guid>
		<description>I believe there are ways we could replace both electric generation fuel and petroleum motor fuel with renewables; recent advances in fuel cells have given us efficiency boosts which make it possible.&#160; I wrote up an analysis:&#160; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theoildrum.com/story/2006/11/27/0432/3533&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sustainability, energy independence and agricultural policy&lt;/a&gt; (duplicated with slightly more user-friendly formatting &lt;a href=&quot;http://ergosphere.blogspot.com/2006/11/sustainability-energy-independence-and.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;at my blog&lt;/a&gt;).&#160; Adding more energy from wind and nuclear would make it even easier, though I have not tried to add them to my analysis yet.

Regardless, we need to get started &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;yesterday&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/i&gt;

(I hope this accepts HTML... I hate not having a preview!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe there are ways we could replace both electric generation fuel and petroleum motor fuel with renewables; recent advances in fuel cells have given us efficiency boosts which make it possible.&nbsp; I wrote up an analysis:&nbsp; <a href="http://www.theoildrum.com/story/2006/11/27/0432/3533" rel="nofollow">Sustainability, energy independence and agricultural policy</a> (duplicated with slightly more user-friendly formatting <a href="http://ergosphere.blogspot.com/2006/11/sustainability-energy-independence-and.html" rel="nofollow">at my blog</a>).&nbsp; Adding more energy from wind and nuclear would make it even easier, though I have not tried to add them to my analysis yet.</p>
<p>Regardless, we need to get started <i><b>yesterday</b>.</i></p>
<p>(I hope this accepts HTML&#8230; I hate not having a preview!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/26/2nd-largest-oil-field-drying-up-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-169248</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 05:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/26/2nd-largest-oil-field-drying-up-faster/#comment-169248</guid>
		<description>Peter, what I was saying is there aren&#039;t many external, financial pressures. Not yet at least.  And yes, I know about global warming and it concerns me that we&#039;re not doing more. That was one of the &quot;read between the lines&quot; points of the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, what I was saying is there aren&#8217;t many external, financial pressures. Not yet at least.  And yes, I know about global warming and it concerns me that we&#8217;re not doing more. That was one of the &#8220;read between the lines&#8221; points of the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Parry</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/26/2nd-largest-oil-field-drying-up-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-168847</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Parry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/26/2nd-largest-oil-field-drying-up-faster/#comment-168847</guid>
		<description>Justin Gardner says &quot;right now there isn&#039;t much pressure&quot; to reduce reliance on Oil.  Hello??  Ever heard of global warming Justin? 

Oh and if you are a skeptic - every week a new study shows further damage and evidence of global warming - one reported in the media today was: &quot;Almost every one of more than 300 large glaciers studied worldwide is in retreat, international glaciologists reported in October in the journal Geophysical Research Letters. This is &quot;essentially a response to post-1970 global warming,&quot; they said.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin Gardner says &#8220;right now there isn&#8217;t much pressure&#8221; to reduce reliance on Oil.  Hello??  Ever heard of global warming Justin? </p>
<p>Oh and if you are a skeptic &#8211; every week a new study shows further damage and evidence of global warming &#8211; one reported in the media today was: &#8220;Almost every one of more than 300 large glaciers studied worldwide is in retreat, international glaciologists reported in October in the journal Geophysical Research Letters. This is &#8220;essentially a response to post-1970 global warming,&#8221; they said.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Royce Penstinger</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2006/12/26/2nd-largest-oil-field-drying-up-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-168763</link>
		<dc:creator>Royce Penstinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 10:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2006/12/26/2nd-largest-oil-field-drying-up-faster/#comment-168763</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see...Entergy&#039;s Indian Point Plant here in New York is is currently leaking dangerous radioactive wastes into the ground that are migrating into the Hudson River from leaking spent fuel rod containment pools.  Then, we have the truck carrying 6500 pound of fuel grade uranium being returned from Japan for reprocessing that tipped over last week in North Carolina...Global Nuclear Fuel denies it, but if it was coming back from Japan for reprocessing, that makes it SPENT FUEL...which would explain the exclusionary zone that the DHS threw up around the accident to kill the story....visit my blog, and you&#039;ll find several recent articles that explain why the public is leary about Nuclear Energy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see&#8230;Entergy&#8217;s Indian Point Plant here in New York is is currently leaking dangerous radioactive wastes into the ground that are migrating into the Hudson River from leaking spent fuel rod containment pools.  Then, we have the truck carrying 6500 pound of fuel grade uranium being returned from Japan for reprocessing that tipped over last week in North Carolina&#8230;Global Nuclear Fuel denies it, but if it was coming back from Japan for reprocessing, that makes it SPENT FUEL&#8230;which would explain the exclusionary zone that the DHS threw up around the accident to kill the story&#8230;.visit my blog, and you&#8217;ll find several recent articles that explain why the public is leary about Nuclear Energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
