You Mean Lewis Libby?

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Cartoons, The Plame Game

(Stolen from TMV.)


This entry was posted on Thursday, March 8th, 2007 and is filed under Cartoons, The Plame Game. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Responses to “You Mean Lewis Libby?”

  1. bob in fl Says:

    Sounds like the author of the article just might be very right wing when he says juries are untrained in law. Juries don’t have to know law. They base their decisions on facts, or lack thereof. Our author of the link doesn’t seem to understand the right of having a jury trial is guaranteed in the Constitution. But who cares about the Constitution? Emperer Bush & vice Emperor Cheney have scrapped it anyway

    The jury did their job very well. They were able to separate the counts & decide he was not guilty on one of them, in spite of their feelings about the case.

  2. PatHMV Says:

    I don’t get this at all. The Vice President has been very open about his support for Libby. He testified on his behalf, admitted frankly that he had given the information about Plame’s status to Libby. He spoke up on Libby’s behalf in public more than once. It’s one of the stupider political cartoons I’ve seen of late.

    Now, if you had a cartoon like that of Tom DeLay’s office going “Abramoff who?”, that would be funny.

  3. Justin Gardner Says:

    Pat, you’ve gotta look at this in the context of post-conviction, not pre.

    Libby’s conviction is bad news for Cheney’s credibility, and people are saying, “Libby was the fall guy, where were the other guys?” I guess I just thought this one was pretty clear.

  4. PatHMV Says:

    I guess I see where you’re coming from Justin, but I still don’t see it that way. The usual thing in Washington, upon happening of a scandal, is for all the victim’s former friends and colleagues to shy away from him, distance themselves, to avoid being tainted by association.

    And Libby’s conviction has no rational connection to Cheney’s credibility. Cheney testified, told the truth about things which one would expect to be lied about if a cover-up was going on. Libby was not convicted of leaking the names, just of lying about it. Everybody already knew, there was no dispute that Libby actually did discuss Plame with Miller and Cooper (maybe, that count was dropped) and Russert. Libby’s defense was never to claim that it was Miller and Russert who were lying. The verdict only hurt the credibility of Libby’s claim of a bad memory. That’s it.

    And Libby’s lies did not gloss over the Vice-President’s role. He admitted when and how he found out about Plame’s status. The Vice-President admitted telling all that to Libby. Other than guilt by association, I don’t see why the verdict tells us a single new thing about Cheney.

  5. Justin Gardner Says:

    Fair enough Pat. I see your point.

    I still think the cartoon is humorous since it’s after the conviction. Libby was still the fall guy in all of this, but maybe you’re right. Cheney simply doesn’t care about the whole thing, and thinks history will ultimately be his judge.

    I guess we’ll see.

  6. Donklephant » Blog Archive » I Got A Cease And Desist Letter Says:

    [...] It has come to our attention that you have reproduced a copy of my client’s cartoon on your personal blog on http://donklephant.com/2007/03/09/one-advantage-to-the-fema-trailer-sale and http://donklephant.com/2007/03/08/you-mean-lewis-libby identified below. My client has no record of licensing use of this copyrighted cartoon to you. [...]

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: