<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pardon Libby? 69% Say No.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2007/03/13/pardon-libby-69-say-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/03/13/pardon-libby-69-say-no/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bob in fl</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/03/13/pardon-libby-69-say-no/#comment-266313</link>
		<dc:creator>bob in fl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/03/13/pardon-libby-69-say-no/#comment-266313</guid>
		<description>That makes me part of the 69% &#38; 60%, respectively.. At this point, I believe Bush has about a 10% lower disapproval rate, &#38; I am part of that percentage, also. The poll I would like to see taken is, "Do you believe Bush is really in charge, or Cheney?" I have a feeling Cheney would get more votes than the Pres.

However, I say Long Live King George because he does less damage than King Richard would, especially if Bush died of unbatural causes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makes me part of the 69% &amp; 60%, respectively.. At this point, I believe Bush has about a 10% lower disapproval rate, &amp; I am part of that percentage, also. The poll I would like to see taken is, &#8220;Do you believe Bush is really in charge, or Cheney?&#8221; I have a feeling Cheney would get more votes than the Pres.</p>
<p>However, I say Long Live King George because he does less damage than King Richard would, especially if Bush died of unbatural causes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.466 seconds -->
