<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Internal Probe Of Valerie Plame Leak?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2007/03/16/no-internal-probe-of-valerie-plame-leak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/03/16/no-internal-probe-of-valerie-plame-leak/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:41:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: truthista</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/03/16/no-internal-probe-of-valerie-plame-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-280843</link>
		<dc:creator>truthista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/03/16/no-internal-probe-of-valerie-plame-leak/#comment-280843</guid>
		<description>YES there probably WAS a probe - a sham probe.

See here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/3/19/18334/7157&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Evidence of a Whitewash Leak Investigation by the White House&lt;/a&gt; (Daily Kos)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES there probably WAS a probe &#8211; a sham probe.</p>
<p>See here: <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/3/19/18334/7157" rel="nofollow">Evidence of a Whitewash Leak Investigation by the White House</a> (Daily Kos)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sleipner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/03/16/no-internal-probe-of-valerie-plame-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-272636</link>
		<dc:creator>sleipner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 14:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/03/16/no-internal-probe-of-valerie-plame-leak/#comment-272636</guid>
		<description>Hopefully Congress asks the obvious question...why haven&#039;t we removed this disastrous screwup from office yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully Congress asks the obvious question&#8230;why haven&#8217;t we removed this disastrous screwup from office yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BenG</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/03/16/no-internal-probe-of-valerie-plame-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-271824</link>
		<dc:creator>BenG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 03:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/03/16/no-internal-probe-of-valerie-plame-leak/#comment-271824</guid>
		<description>Justin, 

They&#039;re all so full of shit, it&#039;s disgraceful. When it first came out in the news we all thought Bush was sincere about getting to the bottom of it. It was, after all, a matter of national security, a serious breach of a covert CIA agent, the kinda stuff this administration takes very seriously! Yea, right. The only thing they take seriously is the accumulation of power. Any means necessary for the &#039;greater good&#039; the way they see it. Problem is, Plame&#039;s husband had it right this time, and like so many other times, the Right has gotten it all wrong.
But all these incidence&#039;s are just showing us how the truth will out. I think as things continue to unravel for the Bush administration, Congress will have no choice but to ask the obvious question; why. Why were we led down this path to war with Iraq? As all the reasons given are shown to be false, how can they avoid the obvious?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin, </p>
<p>They&#8217;re all so full of shit, it&#8217;s disgraceful. When it first came out in the news we all thought Bush was sincere about getting to the bottom of it. It was, after all, a matter of national security, a serious breach of a covert CIA agent, the kinda stuff this administration takes very seriously! Yea, right. The only thing they take seriously is the accumulation of power. Any means necessary for the &#8216;greater good&#8217; the way they see it. Problem is, Plame&#8217;s husband had it right this time, and like so many other times, the Right has gotten it all wrong.<br />
But all these incidence&#8217;s are just showing us how the truth will out. I think as things continue to unravel for the Bush administration, Congress will have no choice but to ask the obvious question; why. Why were we led down this path to war with Iraq? As all the reasons given are shown to be false, how can they avoid the obvious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob in fl</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2007/03/16/no-internal-probe-of-valerie-plame-leak/comment-page-1/#comment-271814</link>
		<dc:creator>bob in fl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 03:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/2007/03/16/no-internal-probe-of-valerie-plame-leak/#comment-271814</guid>
		<description>So, what else can we expect from this White House? Of course they (Bush) can always use the same excuse that Libby did: &quot;I was so busy with other things, I just plain forgot all about it&quot;.

Oh, wait. I&#039;d bet he turned the investigation over to Rove or maybe Cheney?  I hope he did it via email?

Sheesh!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what else can we expect from this White House? Of course they (Bush) can always use the same excuse that Libby did: &#8220;I was so busy with other things, I just plain forgot all about it&#8221;.</p>
<p>Oh, wait. I&#8217;d bet he turned the investigation over to Rove or maybe Cheney?  I hope he did it via email?</p>
<p>Sheesh!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
