Which Drugs Are The Most Toxic?

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Drugs, Science

(h/t: Sully)


This entry was posted on Sunday, March 25th, 2007 and is filed under Drugs, Science. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Responses to “Which Drugs Are The Most Toxic?”

  1. bob in fl Says:

    Now if we saw results for common prescription drugs, we would see many more at the bottom of the graph.

  2. sleipner Says:

    Obviously, direct toxicity is obviously not the only measure of danger for a drug. In addition to that, some drugs have an additional psychological or environmental risk of death or injury, either to the user or to those around them due to behaviors they induce. It would be interesting to see if that sort of data was included in this study.

    I’m guessing this chart is probably from the study published recently in the Lancet magazine where Professor David Nutt of Bristol University said that alcohol and tobacco are more dangerous than several other common party drugs, in particular marijuana and ecstasy.

    Though I have no desire to increase regulations on those two substances, given the result of the last prohibition (the Mafia and organized crime), I do believe this study provides ammunition for the effort to decriminalize and regulate the less physically and socially dangerous drugs. We should be using real science and actual data to determine what should and should not be off limits, rather than hysteria and prejudice.

    In addition, decriminalization and regulation of certain of the more popular, less dangerous drugs would provide a far safer source for those wishing to partake in such activities, who currently buy from shady dealers with bathtub manufacturies that often produce and sell toxic poisons that are billed as ecstasy or other such drugs. The legal system is currently overwhelmed with meaningless marijuana and ecstasy possession or dealing cases that do nothing but cost society a fortune in legal fees and clog up already overcrowded jails. As a side benefit, we would eliminate the massive and extremely toxic chemical releases these manufacturies often flush into our sewer systems or even directly into local waterways or groundwater.

    By removing the profitable mass market drugs such as ecstasy and forcing dealers to sell only the more dangerous drugs, we can concentrate the “war on drugs” to those drugs that really matter and cause far greater societal harm, and starve many of the dealers into a different profession. Thus we would have a far greater chance of success in reducing the negative social consequences of those drugs.

  3. DosPeros Says:

    Ummm, nutmeg? I think I have some nutmeg in the cabinet — thinking about going home and trying some. I’ll let you know what happens.

  4. Justin Gardner Says:

    Well said sleipner. I’m promoting this to its own post.

  5. Donklephant » Blog Archive » On Drug Toxicity And Policy Says:

    [...] sleipner, one of our more frequent commenters on Donklephant had this to say on my recent post about drug toxicity… Obviously, direct toxicity is obviously not the only measure of danger for a drug. In addition to that, some drugs have an additional psychological or environmental risk of death or injury, either to the user or to those around them due to behaviors they induce. It would be interesting to see if that sort of data was included in this study. [...]

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: